No, he meant: SHUT THE FUCK UP
You're an idiot
- 1
No, he meant: SHUT THE FUCK UP
I'm gonna get the lastword, you can't stop me
I thought you meant chill on the picture spam
Which I did
Wrong link and fixing that then I'm done
Spam in general is what I meant. Just dial it back a bit.
Is this what a true hodjout was like back on ReRolled? I must have missed them if so cause this is a crazy post rate, no lie.
Spam in general is what I meant. Just dial it back a bit.
Is this what a true hodjout was like back on ReRolled? I must have missed them if so cause this is a crazy post rate, no lie.
Yeah pretty close. If anything I was angrier and not able to formulate my positions as clearly as rapidly because i was usually on adderall and should probably have been studying at the time lol
But I gotcha. I thought the issue was I was uploading too much data in images and it was pissing off your IP.
*Starcraft 2Johnny Sack hodj'ing out is like one of those asian pro-Stargate 2 players... he should record his fingers and keyboard and upload it so the world can marvel.
But journalists at leading American news organizations — including CNN, the New York Times, Politico, ABC News, and MSNBC — have helped weaponize this disinformation by repeating the baseless smear over and over, without promptly and accurately conveying that Trump and Giuliani are lying about what the former vice president did in Ukraine. So lies and misinformation have been broadcast nationwide, reaching millions of people who will never read subsequent fact checks debunking them.
This began in May, when Giuliani’s embrace of the conspiracy theory was reported on the front page of the Times, in an article that forced readers to wait until the 19th paragraph to find out that “No evidence has surfaced that the former vice president intentionally tried to help his son by pressing for the prosecutor general’s dismissal.” Even so, the Times politics reporter who interviewed Giuliani, Ken Vogel, claimed on Twitter that this meant “The BIDENS are entangled in a Ukrainian corruption scandal.”
Notice how they refuse to address the substance here
Its all flak
"What about biden? What about people the committee refused to subpoena? Ignore the multiple witnesses we're telling to refuse subpoenas"
It all boils down to the fact that they cannot, will not, answer this simple question:
"Do you think it is okay for the President to use US taxpayer dollars to solicit personal political favors from foreign leaders in order to influence our domestic elections, to the President's benefit and no other?"