I should be chairmen of the Fed. Or You.THey didn't even end the QE. Sucks to be right all the time. Powell's a pussy
Ukraine is a non-event. Biden will not physically oppose Russia in Ukraine. Nor will Nato. And Russia isn't going further west than Ukraine.With the threat of the Ukraine situation.. how disconnected are they from those politics? Being super hawkish with this geopolitical tinder box primed doesn't seem wise.
Super hawkish? This Fed isn't even remotely hawkish. We have Stockholm syndrome we don't even know what hawkish is at this point. QE is still going, it still as I type this is pumping more liquidity into the market.With the threat of the Ukraine situation.. how disconnected are they from those politics? Being super hawkish with this geopolitical tinder box primed doesn't seem wise.
Normally that is Zog as of late.Who was posting doom and gloom earlier this morning?
Of course they aren't, I was posing the question in the context of some "analysts" claiming they would jump the gun straight to a 50bp move at this meeting, along with accellerated taper.Super hawkish? This Fed isn't even remotely hawkish. We have Stockholm syndrome we don't even know what hawkish is at this point. QE is still going, it still as I type this is pumping more liquidity into the market.
Those aren't analysts. They are crackheads.Of course they aren't, I was posing the question in the context of some "analysts" claiming they would jump the gun straight to a 50bp move at this meeting, along with accellerated taper.
People confuse what they know to be the right move versus what this Fed will be willing to do. Even people thinking four rate hikes this year, this is a fed that will use ANY excuse to delay a hike. Oh 4 people in Guatamalasia have a new form of the cold well we better wait.Of course they aren't, I was posing the question in the context of some "analysts" claiming they would jump the gun straight to a 50bp move at this meeting, along with accellerated taper.