I know I am going to jinx myself but SPIR has made 3 straight green closes. It has only done that one other time since Sept.
I don't know how much cash you are working with but you could write puts on the $80 strike Fed expiry. This takes it beyond earnings so its got some risk involved but those puts are selling for 70 cents for three weeks of hold. If you did end up assigned you would get the stock at $79.30 which is a solid entry. You could cut some risk and sell the $75 strike for about 50 cent premium and a cost basis of $74.50 if assigned.Yeah, I was looking at that too. It was 103 when I was looking and resistance at 106 with support way down at 81 looks like a trap to me. I think I'll wait and see, though having not pulled the trigger on this one and NVDA back in August still makes me facepalm, sooo.... feh.
Ya I have no idea how all of that works, so I'm not doing options. It's one of the things I need to sit down and study more and then do some investopedia trading on, but just haven't done it yet. I'm probably leaving a lot on the table, but also not making huge mistakes with it either.I don't know how much cash you are working with but you could write puts on the $80 strike Fed expiry. This takes it beyond earnings so its got some risk involved but those puts are selling for 70 cents for three weeks of hold. If you did end up assigned you would get the stock at $79.30 which is a solid entry. You could cut some risk and sell the $75 strike for about 50 cent premium and a cost basis of $74.50 if assigned.
I agree with your thinking. However I wouldn't point you on the path of "large mistakes".Ya I have no idea how all of that works, so I'm not doing options. It's one of the things I need to sit down and study more and then do some investopedia trading on, but just haven't done it yet. I'm probably leaving a lot on the table, but also not making huge mistakes with it either.
The $75 puts 3 weeks out look pretty good. The scary thing is earnings coming up. It's still like a 25% drawdown from today's close though. And ask yourself, would you buy AMD at $75 if it crated after earnings? If so, then the put play is good.So 10k for AMD puts?
I know we make fun of ARKK of late (and rightly so), but reading this and seeing the actual numbers is fucking scary.
The $75 puts 3 weeks out look pretty good. The scary thing is earnings coming up. It's still like a 25% drawdown from today's close though. And ask yourself, would you buy AMD at $75 if it crated after earnings? If so, then the put play is good.
I didn't mean I thought you might be steering me wrong, quite the opposite. I just don't fully understand the mechanics involved with it, so I'm not risking my money with it until I do. I get what calls and puts do backwards all the time for instance, the numbers involved are typically a lot more than I'm playing with unless I'm completely mistaken. The time component makes no sense to me right now, and knowing when to sell or buy would be akin to your blind Tyson dart board gif from earlier.I agree with your thinking. However I wouldn't point you on the path of "large mistakes".
Short version: selling puts on stocks you want to own allows you to either a> get paid for selling the put and nothing else happens (thus you pocket the money) or b> you end up buying the shares at a price no higher than what you choose AND you still get to pocket the premium. The biggest risk is the stock you write ends up crashing and you get it at a lower value than you pay for it. But this is exactly the same as if you had bought the stock at a certain price and it kept falling.
One big difference is that with buying the stock at x price you own it. If you wrote a put on a stock and it sinks beyond a price you expected or if some material change happens you can just buy your way out of the option without taking the shares or roll out the option into the future and buy some time to see if the stock recovers. I am currently doing this with my MTTR puts.
Also no margin is required to write puts. Just cash collateral.
Stuff I'm reading says we're in for sideways chop for a week or so followed by a leg down in early Feb.
I know we make fun of ARKK of late (and rightly so), but reading this and seeing the actual numbers is fucking scary.
I wasn't really knowledgeable about her early on. She is a woman in a male dominant industry and she day traded some stocks in the right industry at the right time. Everyone in the media pumped her as the next coming because she is a woman. Maybe she is brilliant, idk. Reversion to the mean hits everyone though. Just ask Buffett.I've seen her brought up a number of times with ARKK and such. How did she get into the position that she is in that she has a big enough name that everyone talks about her and from what people talk like she impacts them as well?
It's cause I am hiding it on my portfolio. You can thank me later.
I know we make fun of ARKK of late (and rightly so), but reading this and seeing the actual numbers is fucking scary.
One thing to consider on returns for individuals is that it (I believe) calculates it based on total dollars gained va starting dollars (correctly so). So if you hold any statistically significant amount in your cash position for any length of time your total return is much lower than your cash invested return. It's one reason I track my portfolio in Excel and update it daily.Reversion to the mean (edit: Shit, Sanrith Descartes beat me to that in a reply).
It's been said many, many times, but pretty much no fund manager can beat the market return long term. Sure, you get some that can beat it one year. There are a couple rockstars who beat it for maybe 3 or 4 years in a row. But they all seem to end up underperforming the market; meaning they have to have some really bad years to counteract those ones where they beat it.
I feel like there's maybe one or two people who consistently beat the market, and someone like Blazin will let me know who they are, but investing with them is an exclusive club.
Oh, and there's Nancy Pelosi, the great Wall Street Oracle of the 21st century.