People probably were lapping up the optimism that was coming about 1 more hike and then we can start cutting at the end of the year. I think there’s a lot of people who just don’t understand how big this mess we’ve gotten ourselves into is. The fed is going to have to put the screws in to get inflation under control and they are still using a gentle hand.So the guy who wanted a 50 last meeting is in favor of a 50 next meeting. Color me shocked. And the market somehow thinks this is worth a dump. Algos gonna algo.
Sometimes you eat the bear and sometimes the bear eats you...Tesla shitting the bed hard. Absolutely in overbought territory on the back of a >100% move in the last weeks, so was due for a pullback.
Sold a third of my TSLA and banked those crash price profits. Being TSLA, if it crashed again I will rinse and repeat. As it stands now I am down to a half-sized position down about 10% with the new adjusted cost basis.
We had a great run of green candles the last 3 weeks. We were due for some pullback.People probably were lapping up the optimism that was coming about 1 more hike and then we can start cutting at the end of the year. I think there’s a lot of people who just don’t understand how big this mess we’ve gotten ourselves into is. The fed is going to have to put the screws in to get inflation under control and they are still using a gentle hand.
They have added new verticals such as Wyze cameras etc. (not sure I see this as a big revenue generator, but who knows), but I think once they move into areas such as LATAM/APAC that they will really thrive with their low-cost hardware. However, ad revenue is what they are really making significant revenue on I believe and with the move to streaming apps, that forecast is brighter each day and they have managed to maintain good leverage over Youtube etc. to maintain healthy contracts.Re Roku:
Cheap power processor and good OS for lightweight travel. I would be sad if I forgot it on any work trip.
New models will remember hotel authentication if you stay at same brand hotel. Niche, but it’s good tech.
My pieces of confusion -Some on Wall Street are concerned that the growing popularity of 0DTEs is making U.S. stock markets more volatile and more fragile as outsize daily swings in the largest, most liquid equity indexes, like the S&P 500 , become more frequent.
Its not a simple explanation so here is the best simple version I can:Is there something to this or BS?
News by Dow Jones on TradingView, 2023-02-17
www.tradingview.com
My pieces of confusion -
- I thought that I understood trading options did not affect share prices.
- Since introduction of 0dte M-F the market has been flatter, not more volatile, hasnt it?
Was wondering if some of you stock market regulars can explain something for me. I see ETFs and index funds being advised everywhere and I get the idea behind them. However, if these funds only invest in the top 20/50/500 stocks, does that not cause disproportionate buying pressure on these stocks compared to the rest of the market? If one stock becomes a larger % of the market index, does an ETF not cause additional flow into it, creating a snowball effect?
Absolutely. People love to say that this causes an imbalance in the market, however they're missing that as more and more money flows into index funds, it allows other market participants to take advantage of that by buying individual stocks.Was wondering if some of you stock market regulars can explain something for me. I see ETFs and index funds being advised everywhere and I get the idea behind them. However, if these funds only invest in the top 20/50/500 stocks, does that not cause disproportionate buying pressure on these stocks compared to the rest of the market? If one stock becomes a larger % of the market index, does an ETF not cause additional flow into it, creating a snowball effect?
So, who is right? Stocks or bonds?