Investing General Discussion

  • Guest, it's time once again for the massively important and exciting FoH Asshat Tournament!



    Go here and give us your nominations!
    Who's been the biggest Asshat in the last year? Give us your worst ones!

Arden

Blackwing Lair Raider
2,732
2,055
Well, I guess I'll at least have a year to get a feel for the place before I even have a decision to make. Thanks for the input.

You could always talk to a tax professional. I get not wanting to spend money on one, but if you are talking about a pretty big sum of money, it's probably worth getting professional advice.
 
  • 2Like
Reactions: 1 users

ToeMissile

Pronouns: zie/zhem/zer
<Gold Donor>
3,174
2,060
You could always talk to a tax professional. I get not wanting to spend money on one, but if you are talking about a pretty big sum of money, it's probably worth getting professional advice.
This, and even though your coworkers haven't steered you wrong so far, I would make sure to at a minimum do your own research to confirm. But like Arden is saying, for a larger amount a professional can definitely save your ass.
 
  • 1Solidarity
Reactions: 1 user

The_Black_Log Foler

PalsCo CEO - Stock Pals | Pantheon Pals
<Gold Donor>
47,699
42,928
Blazin Blazin you been doubling down on SNOW at these latest prices or do you tend to buy in all at once and sit? UI briefly hit green for me Friday at my 118ish cost basis.
 
  • 1Hodjing
Reactions: 1 user

Blazin

Creative Title
<Nazi Janitors>
6,954
36,159
Blazin Blazin you been doubling down on SNOW at these latest prices or do you tend to buy in all at once and sit? UI briefly hit green for me Friday at my 118ish cost basis.
Bought a few times cost basis around 170, don't plan on buying anymore at this time. I won't be buying any more equities other than special situations until we get some cooling off.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user

Blazin

Creative Title
<Nazi Janitors>
6,954
36,159
I'm up almost 100% on my bitcoin ETF, this is where it's very hard to not sell when you make that kind of return so quickly. I'm going to hold on though. I really do want to hold it for 10 years if for no other reason to be able to see how it does against S&P over that period.

If I had a million of it I think I'd probably say forget that and sell but it's only a few % of net worth so its not going to hurt me going to zero but could be pretty nice helper if it goes up 1000%. I wanted to get to 5% holding but was a little slow on the legging in I thought the corrective period would last a few more weeks than it did so didn't get there, I may go ahead and get it to that level if we get a correction.
 
  • 4Like
  • 1Solidarity
  • 1Mother of God
Reactions: 6 users

Flobee

Vyemm Raider
2,674
3,072
I'm up almost 100% on my bitcoin ETF, this is where it's very hard to not sell when you make that kind of return so quickly. I'm going to hold on though. I really do want to hold it for 10 years if for no other reason to be able to see how it does against S&P over that period.

If I had a million of it I think I'd probably say forget that and sell but it's only a few % of net worth so its not going to hurt me going to zero but could be pretty nice helper if it goes up 1000%. I wanted to get to 5% holding but was a little slow on the legging in I thought the corrective period would last a few more weeks than it did so didn't get there, I may go ahead and get it to that level if we get a correction.
I think this approach is really smart and will be mimic'd by a lot of institutional investors. The volatility and lack of correlation with traditional markets give Bitcoin price exposure a ton of value to more conservative portfolios. There is quite a bit of research on this comparing downside risk vs its outsized return potential. I expect Bitcoin ETFs to be a part of every pension fund, insurance fund, endowments, etc.

I remember seeing a really well made calculator created for this exact purpose where you can give it a traditional portfolio and it will return with what performance would look like at various % allocations to Bitcoin over various time periods but I'm having trouble finding it again. I'll add it here if I can find it. Spoiler'd article goes over the basics though if anyone is interested.

 
Last edited:
  • 3Like
Reactions: 2 users

The_Black_Log Foler

PalsCo CEO - Stock Pals | Pantheon Pals
<Gold Donor>
47,699
42,928
Just doubled down on my SNOW holdings. That’s it for me on SNOW. I’m OCD and wanted equal shares of UI and SNOW (10 total). Blazin Blazin , nice lil surge this morning

IMG_6245.jpeg
 
  • 1Hodjing
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 users

The_Black_Log Foler

PalsCo CEO - Stock Pals | Pantheon Pals
<Gold Donor>
47,699
42,928
So I came to an epiphany the other day and I know most of you will be like “ya no shit” so bear with me.

Right now I have 300 shares of RKLB to hold for 20 years. I have 10 shares of SNOW and 10 shares of UI. UI products I’m a huge fan of and believe in. SNOW I’m following similar to Blazin’s strategy of watching their YoY revenue and it ending up being a 5 year hold if revenue stays up.

However it kinda it me - I can buy into a stock right now that I think will explode over the next 5, 10, 15 years. However, that stock may not explode till the last few years of that time horizon. Meanwhile my opportunity cost is I’m missing out on almost a guaranteed return of say 7-10% in a sp500 fund in the years these individual stocks are toiling with zero growth or volatility before they take off.

So I guess really my expectation would be that I should evaluate that these individual stocks should increase by % percentage on a specific time horizon then compare it with the alternative, say SPY for example. Does that make sense?

It seems like this gets into the territory of “timing when to buy” to only have your money in these stocks for as little time as possible before they take off.

Any thoughts or insights into this? I think I’m starting to see why people say it’s so hard to beat the sp500.
 
  • 1Hodjing
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 users

Loser Araysar

Chief Russia Reporter. Stock Pals CEO. Head of AI.
<Gold Donor>
80,162
160,371
So I came to an epiphany the other day and I know most of you will be like “ya no shit” so bear with me.

Right now I have 300 shares of RKLB to hold for 20 years. I have 10 shares of SNOW and 10 shares of UI. UI products I’m a huge fan of and believe in. SNOW I’m following similar to Blazin’s strategy of watching their YoY revenue and it ending up being a 5 year hold if revenue stays up.

However it kinda it me - I can buy into a stock right now that I think will explode over the next 5, 10, 15 years. However, that stock may not explode till the last few years of that time horizon. Meanwhile my opportunity cost is I’m missing out on almost a guaranteed return of say 7-10% in a sp500 fund in the years these individual stocks are toiling with zero growth or volatility before they take off.

So I guess really my expectation would be that I should evaluate that these individual stocks should increase by % percentage on a specific time horizon then compare it with the alternative, say SPY for example. Does that make sense?

It seems like this gets into the territory of “timing when to buy” to only have your money in these stocks for as little time as possible before they take off.

Any thoughts or insights into this? I think I’m starting to see why people say it’s so hard to beat the sp500.

ya no shit, Foler.

But seriously.

Ya no shit
 
  • 1EyeRoll
Reactions: 1 user

Gravel

Mr. Poopybutthole
39,450
129,886
So I came to an epiphany the other day and I know most of you will be like “ya no shit” so bear with me.

Right now I have 300 shares of RKLB to hold for 20 years. I have 10 shares of SNOW and 10 shares of UI. UI products I’m a huge fan of and believe in. SNOW I’m following similar to Blazin’s strategy of watching their YoY revenue and it ending up being a 5 year hold if revenue stays up.

However it kinda it me - I can buy into a stock right now that I think will explode over the next 5, 10, 15 years. However, that stock may not explode till the last few years of that time horizon. Meanwhile my opportunity cost is I’m missing out on almost a guaranteed return of say 7-10% in a sp500 fund in the years these individual stocks are toiling with zero growth or volatility before they take off.

So I guess really my expectation would be that I should evaluate that these individual stocks should increase by % percentage on a specific time horizon then compare it with the alternative, say SPY for example. Does that make sense?

It seems like this gets into the territory of “timing when to buy” to only have your money in these stocks for as little time as possible before they take off.

Any thoughts or insights into this? I think I’m starting to see why people say it’s so hard to beat the sp500.
What you're skirting around here is Modern Portfolio Risk.

Essentially, there are two risk factors associated with a stock; the risk to the company itself, and the risk to the total market. The goal of diversifying your portfolio is to eliminate as much company risk as possible and be left with market risk. To do that, you need to accumulate stocks that have as little correlation as possible (e.g. two energy sector stocks will likely move together, so they're not providing very much diversification). Generally you're looking at around 15 different companies to provide enough diversity in the portfolio to only be left with market risk.

I'm probably doing a shit job of explaining it because I went to business school 15 years ago and the only thing I remember about it is memorizing that ridiculous formula and calculating it out with 15 companies on a test.

While you can absolutely hit on a single company, you're also massively exposed to the risk to that company (see my comment the other day about having a significant portion of your portfolio in the company you work for). This is why broad market index funds are the best fit for 99% of people.

But you can read more here:

 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user

Khane

Got something right about marriage
20,346
14,011
Blazin has already commented on this several times throughout the life of this thread in a manner that is easy to understand and verify.

Compare returns over a long time horizon between the S&P 500 vs the top X companies within the S&P 500.
 
  • 2Like
Reactions: 1 users

The_Black_Log Foler

PalsCo CEO - Stock Pals | Pantheon Pals
<Gold Donor>
47,699
42,928
Blazin has already commented on this several times throughout the life of this thread in a manner that is easy to understand and verify.

Compare returns over a long time horizon between the S&P 500 vs the top X companies within the S&P 500.
Thanks, I should have searched prior. Will do
 
  • 1Hodjing
Reactions: 1 user

Zzen

Potato del Grande
2,887
3,589
Tough day for the IJS trade. Gave up the 50 day without much of a fight.

Hot inflation buttfucking small caps.
 

Blazin

Creative Title
<Nazi Janitors>
6,954
36,159
Tough day for the IJS trade. Gave up the 50 day without much of a fight.

Hot inflation buttfucking small caps.
Just need to hold 200d, definitely a day of market saying fine rates higher for longer. A weekly close of IJS below 200d would be concerning to me but it also just means we continue in the box we've been in for years. Will cross that bridge when we/if we come to it. What I'm seeing right now is small caps trading above their 200d moving average for a longer period than any previous attempt in the last few years. LOnger we stay above it the more relevant it becomes.
 
  • 5Like
Reactions: 4 users

Zzen

Potato del Grande
2,887
3,589
Just need to hold 200d, definitely a day of market saying fine rates higher for longer. A weekly close of IJS below 200d would be concerning to me but it also just means we continue in the box we've been in for years. Will cross that bridge when we/if we come to it. What I'm seeing right now is small caps trading above their 200d moving average for a longer period than any previous attempt in the last few years. LOnger we stay above it the more relevant it becomes.

Love it. Thanks man 👍
 

Zzen

Potato del Grande
2,887
3,589
Think the higher for longer means small cap rotation is delayed? Looks like bull flags on the weekly and monthly charts to me, but my crayon drawing, I mean TA skills are still developing.

Feels like it’s a spring that’s coiled and ready to explode, but maybe that’s just what I want to see 🤷‍♂️
 

Blazin

Creative Title
<Nazi Janitors>
6,954
36,159
Think the higher for longer means small cap rotation is delayed? Looks like bull flags on the weekly and monthly charts to me, but my crayon drawing, I mean TA skills are still developing.

Feels like it’s a spring that’s coiled and ready to explode, but maybe that’s just what I want to see 🤷‍♂️
well look at february of 2023 was a very similar set up and it just couldn't get it done. Someday it's going to break out of this box and the longer its in the bigger the move is going to be when it does.

Screenshot 2024-03-14 155435.png
 
  • 2Like
Reactions: 1 users

Zzen

Potato del Grande
2,887
3,589
well look at february of 2023 was a very similar set up and it just couldn't get it done. Someday it's going to break out of this box and the longer its in the bigger the move is going to be when it does.

View attachment 519760

Just another lesson in patience, I suppose. Like you said, this is the catch up trade, so there are some weak hands to shake out at this table.

Pretty nice closing action at least. Must have trapped a few more 🌈 🐻
 

Blazin

Creative Title
<Nazi Janitors>
6,954
36,159
Just another lesson in patience, I suppose. Like you said, this is the catch up trade, so there are some weak hands to shake out at this table.

Pretty nice closing action at least. Must have trapped a few more 🌈 🐻
I knew it wasn't going to hit early because starting the year it became everyone's play wanting to be long smallcaps. Lots of that hot air has come out while we consolidate, more and more "stay away from small caps" from money managers.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user