Izo
Tranny Chaser
- 19,622
- 23,956
By your logic, we could remove putin from that picture and you could claim it's not a cutler avatar because it's cutler wearing a bears uniform and cutler wearing a bears uniform isn't the same as just cutler. Basically, you have the mistaken idea that the presence of something other than cutler makes it no longer a cutler avatar.
Araysar_sl said:The stipulation was a Cutler avatar, not a Putin avatar or a Cutler/Putin avatar. Just a Cutler avatar. Which I would have gladly worn. The way that the butthurt losers decided to interpret it is that if they could stick a 4 pixel photo of Cutler somewhere in a 600,000 pixel avatar image, that would somehow satisfy their butthurt and circumvent the rules that were agreed to in the bet.
Yes, let's try to be logical about this. If you want to argue primary sensory qualities, colors, shades, shapes, ratios, don't matter, at least do it proper and founded. If that really was the case, you, the people, would not have Araysar banned or RRP'ed for this, now would you. Let's not be dishonest here, shall we? Thank you.webster.com_sl said:Logic
: a proper or reasonable way of thinking about or understanding something
So far Araysar does not seem to be the one who is violating the stipulation which was agreed on. Let's try not to conflate the honesty, integrity or wits of Araysar with what you mistakenly perceive to be a loophole. That's the first grievance here.
The questions is this: Do you as a reasonable man think the Avatar reflects Cutler, Putin or both? I urge you to compare to the A Moon Bat posted avatar?
Araysar lost the bet, but the community and Tuco violated the stipulation of the bet. Thus Araysar was unjustly banned and subsequently RRP'ed for a period far exeeding the initial stipulation. That's the second grievance. The price has by any reasonable account been payed in full - and then some.
Araysar_sl said:A contract just like any contract is based on reals, not feels.