Tanoomba, you are a such a pussy. Why would anyone attempt a compromise with a party that is offering literally nothing? If he doesn't accept the avatar, who fucking cares? He can stay banned.
The choice is between standing up for bets being upheld, which they should be, or siding with A Moon Bat.When did you become such an uncritical follower of Tubro?
Nothing else good to argue about tonight anyway.Izo sure fucking sucked you all in.
You're missing the point. You're being so stubborn that you don't realize there is a way to make him pay his debtthat will satisfy all parties. Araysar has painted himself into a corner. As long as you can provide an avatar that evenhecan't deny is a "Cutler avatar", then it can be as humiliating as you want it to be. I have put what is undoubtedly the minimum of effort and come up with this:Tanoomba, you are a such a pussy. Why would anyone attempt a compromise with a party that is offering literally nothing? If he doesn't accept the avatar, who fucking cares? He can stay banned.
But you're not standing up for bets at all. You're standing up for precedent over stipulation. That's not rational in any sense, nor is it just. Also, if A Moon Bat could be swayed to express the same opinion as the populistic crowd you'd be agreeing with Araysar's pov to be consistent?The choice is between standing up for bets being upheld, which they should be, or siding with A Moon Bat.
The choice is clear
Nothing else good to argue about tonight anyway.
Araysar's satisfaction is irrelevant here.You're being so stubborn that you don't realize there is a way to make him pay his debtthat will satisfy all parties.
Yeah, I am.But you're not standing up for bets at all.
Technically you're only standing up for the default kind. That's, technically, not standing up for bets. It doesn't include the one in question. Are you arguing that only the default bet - wear an avatar of the winners choice - which was not stipulated, nor was it agreed upon - is the only bet? If so, why are you irrational?Araysar's satisfaction is irrelevant here.
Yeah, I am.
Already happened.But you're not standing up for bets at all. You're standing up for precedent over stipulation. That's not rational in any sense, nor is it just. Also, if A Moon Bat could be swayed to express the same opinion as the populistic crowd you'd be agreeing with Araysar's pov to be consistent?
Technically you're only standing up for the default kind. That's, technically, not standing up for bets. It doesn't include the one in question. Are you arguing that only the default bet - wear an avatar of the winners choice - which was not stipulated, nor was it agreed upon - is the only bet? If so, why are you irrational?
Down in front!This all hinges around your opinion that an avatar prominently featuring Cutler isn't a Cutler avatar. So who the fuck cares what you think if you're going to use Tanoomba logic?
Ooooof, hodj. Looks like you have a conundrum to solve.
Interestingly, "Gavinmad logic" doesn't exist, as it is an oxymoron that would collapse reality and bring about the end of the universe as we know it.This all hinges around your opinion that an avatar prominently featuring Cutler isn't a Cutler avatar. So who the fuck cares what you think if you're going to use Tanoomba logic?
Not really, because man law takes precedence over all.Ooooof, hodj. Looks like you have a conundrum to solve.
this is seriously true.Not really, because man law takes precedence over all.
Man law states bet welchers are faggots.
O'rly? So what catler avatar did he wear? None. He didn't even pick his own and try to pass it off. He just dug in his heels as soon as he lost.So far Araysar does not seem to be the one who is violating the stipulation which was agreed on. Let's try not to conflate the honesty, integrity or wits of Araysar with what you mistakenly perceive to be a loophole. That's the first grievance here.
I wondered that too. But frankly, I never paid enough attention to arasayer to recognize his posting style.So what are chances that Izo gave araysar his login info