All I can think of is Swordfish and Catwoman. And what happens to a frog when it's hit by lightning. Halle Berry tits aren't worth the print.
- 5
Wick vs. Bronn? Come on, this is going to be amazing.
Had a laugh when I saw Laurence Fishburne is in this. I hope he offers Wick a choice, lol.
how are you two doofs commenting on this and haven't seen 2 yet?
cuz jw1 had hot white girl
jw2 had hot mute white girl
jw3 had to have some hot non white girl
for obvious reasons
I vote Gabrielle Union.quick, name a hot black actress in 2019
(not some singer or celebrity like a kardashian)
They make you forget about trash like Johnny Pneumonic.
How can you utter such blasphemy? Dolph as a cyborg street preacher and a dolphin as Anonymous hacker - fucking genius writing.
Should have just gone with Olivia Munn.quick, name a hot black actress in 2019
(not some singer or celebrity like a kardashian)
Well if you're using the stipulation of abusing bad guys, then ok, Cruise is out. I guess. But I don't know what you'd call the guy that made all those Mission Impossibles, Edge of Tomorrow, Collateral, Jack Reacher, The Last Samurai, Minority Report & Oblivion were action-y enough, even the fucking shitty Mummy, and all in the same time frame from The Matrix...if not an action hero? Blockbuster hero then?? So ok, beating up bad guys, no Cruise. Not beating up bad guys, Cruise and Reeves are at least a pick 'em. And again, I love Reeves, and will watch almost anything he's in.Yea, 30, thanks.
And holy shit I forgot Speed which I watched 1000x lol.
I was expecting you to say Arnold, Stallone, or Bruce Willis... but Tom Cruise? lol nahhhh...
I'm talking the pure action movies with someone steamrolling baddies. Jet Li and Matt Damon might be contenders for current gen, but Keanu has The Matrix, Constinople, Ronin, and John Wick, he's gotta be #1 current gen. And Arnold, Stallone, Willis are the previous gen
Good points, I see cruise more blockbuster. His action movies are more calculated and less pure adrenaline... with some exceptions of course.Well if you're using the stipulation of abusing bad guys, then ok, Cruise is out. I guess. But I don't know what you'd call the guy that made all those Mission Impossibles, Edge of Tomorrow, Collateral, Jack Reacher, The Last Samurai, Minority Report & Oblivion were action-y enough, even the fucking shitty Mummy, and all in the same time frame from The Matrix...if not an action hero? Blockbuster hero then?? So ok, beating up bad guys, no Cruise. Not beating up bad guys, Cruise and Reeves are at least a pick 'em. And again, I love Reeves, and will watch almost anything he's in.
And if you're going off of pure steamrolling bad guys, assuming Reeves is #1, Statham shits all over Li and Damon, at least for the past decade anyway.
You could just view it as, JW1 was great, in order to make another such great movie, they needed a lead-in movie and that was JW2, if you think about it, JW2 is basically setting up JW3 and why it's JW vs.On topic: I will go and see this film opening weekend. These guys deserve my money at the door, simply based on how good JW1 was. JW2 was a good solid film, and i enjoyed it, it was always a huge challenge following JW1.