A vast majority of people who think he's guilty are those who look at the fact he had a gun and a little boy was unarmed. That's it. That's exactly what the state argued, the emotion part of it. How can this man kill this boy, he had skittles? It's only when you look at the evidence you realize they have no case and for the most part haven't disproven anything George has said.
But for most people, he got out of his car, he said fucking punks, the child only had skittles, fry him. To hell with the actual facts of the case.