not at all predicated on stand your ground.
Contradicting your own statements.troll account, that's some funny stuff. Its a valid opinion to believe that regressing to the wild west days of vigilante justice that stand your ground promotes is a bad thing.
Save the time, and the trouble, of typing out all that shit no one is going to read, you're demonstrably wrong.
No, we can't get past the fact that you're essentially saying protecting yourself from grevious bodily injury or death isn't morally right.You guys can't get passed the fact that what he did was legal, I'm ok with that. I don't think it was right.
That's fucking stupid.
He didn't follow him. But had you paid attention to the timeline and the trial, you'd know that.Ive heard more than a couple comments about trayvon assaulting Zimmerman and that you shouldn't "assault a random person" I believe is the quote. And yet it isn't it also prudent not to follow someone you feel may be armed and who gave you an oh shit moment.
Hence why we said you need to read the timeline before you start running your mouth. Lurk MOAR.
Again. Nobody cares about your stance on guns, whether you like them or not, feel other people can be trusted with them or not. There's a gun control thread for that discussion for a reason.Regardless of stand your ground I don't want neighborhood watch volunteers packing heat, and getting out of their cars to see where someone they think is an asshole is going.