vGrade
Potato del Grande
- 1,759
- 2,739
To be fair the Martins will prob sue him in civil court to try and prevent him from receiving any money
Justice for Zimmerman
- Thread starter Adebisi
- Start date
-
Guest, it's time once again for the massively important and exciting FoH Asshat Tournament!
Go here and give us your nominations!Who's been the biggest Asshat in the last year? Give us your worst ones!
- Status
Noodleface
A Mod Real Quick
- 38,275
- 15,107
Tough to say, depends on the server rules. Usually after some period, loot goes free-loot.
Arbitrary
Tranny Chaser
- 29,014
- 79,729
rebuttle rules aside, how could the judge allow information from a facebook page into testimony but not cell phone text messages and photographs after citing the possibility of "hackers".... fucking judge pudge
I wonder what this GZ training includes, wonder if its mma training or a class that teaches you the loopholes of the laws in florida and allows you to go around antagonizing young black youth into fighting you, and then allowing you to shoot them in the face.
i mean who would want to buy training from a place where GZ was training at... he was the one getting his ass beat, trademarks mom should have been smart and set up some "trayvon beat down" classes.
i mean who would want to buy training from a place where GZ was training at... he was the one getting his ass beat, trademarks mom should have been smart and set up some "trayvon beat down" classes.
ZyyzYzzy
RIP USA
- 25,295
- 48,789
I'm pretty sure Judge Pudge had at the skittles and watermelon drank herself. Remember the evidence locker hold up? She used the key to get them and then ate the key too.
Does anyone know if the Jury can/would they even think to grant him immunity in civil court? Or will that be 100% on Judge Pudge?
Cad
scientia potentia est
- 25,426
- 49,042
No such thing as "immunity in civil court" ??
Never heard of this. Self-defense would be applicable in civil court as well.
ZyyzYzzy
RIP USA
- 25,295
- 48,789
iannis
Musty Nester
- 31,351
- 17,656
I think this is short speak for "if guilty in criminal court, liable in civil court. If not guilty in criminal court, much harder to obtain liable in civil court".
And I very much hope that judges/juries do not have that power.
Cad
scientia potentia est
- 25,426
- 49,042
A guilty verdict would be admissible in civil court as evidence. Not-guilty isn't admissible because the burden of proof is much different in civil court than it is in criminal court; so it'd be a whole new deal in civil court.
- Status