- 25,426
- 49,042
Mostly because OJ was guilty. Zimmerman will do just fine in civil court.Yeah OJ got destroyed in civil court.
Mostly because OJ was guilty. Zimmerman will do just fine in civil court.Yeah OJ got destroyed in civil court.
Well right I was just supporting your bit about criminal court not meaning much in civil court.Mostly because OJ was guilty. Zimmerman will do just fine in civil court.
He could but I doubt they have any assets worth the effort.Can Zimmerman sue the Martin family for the assault and beating he received at the hands of their son? That would be fucking epic justice.
Skittles and Watermelon DrinkHe could but I doubt they have any assets worth the effort.
+ slightly used hoodieSkittles and Watermelon Drink
Cad, the Martin family supposedly won a settlement against HOA. If Zimmerman is found not guilty and not guilty in civil court, does the HOA have to pay out?He could but I doubt they have any assets worth the effort.
If it was a settlement agreement, almost certainly not; no findings would have been made. But it would depend on the language of the settlement. Most likely no, though.Cad, the Martin family supposedly won a settlement against HOA. If Zimmerman is found not guilty and not guilty in civil court, does the HOA have to pay out?
I've been wondering about that every time people mention Manslaughter in the thread. They can just bring lesser chargesnow, or what's the deal? Everywhere I read says Murder 2 and nothing else. I thought you had to be charged with specific shit prior to trial, or at the least indicted. Am I misunderstanding or does it vary from State to State?+ slightly used hoodie
edit - I really don't like how the prosecution gets to shoot for the moon with murder 2 and throw in all these lessers. It has got to create situations where a jury feels like they need to give some form of punishment even if the initial charge is too great but wouldn't have done that if the case was just about that lesser charge from the start.
In Texas i suppose he would be talking about thisNo such thing as "immunity in civil court" ??
Never heard of this. Self-defense would be applicable in civil court as well.
Anyone can can bring suit sure, but it should be tossed as a summary judgment.CPRC CH. 83. USE OF DEADLY FORCE IN DEFENSE OF PERSON
CPRC ? 83.001. CIVIL IMMUNITY.
A defendant who uses force or deadly force that is justified under Chapter 9, Penal Code, is immune
from civil liability for personal injury or death that results from the defendant's use of force or deadly force, as applicable.
In these last minutes or so of the trial they've just been tacking on everything. I have no idea how it works but I don't like it!I've been wondering about that every time people mention Manslaughter in the thread. They can just bring lesser chargesnow, or what's the deal? Everywhere I read says Murder 2 and nothing else. I thought you had to be charged with specific shit prior to trial, or at the least indicted. Am I misunderstanding or does it vary from State to State?
Judges are biased and all and I've seen some personally that are pretty rowdy. This one is pretty bad though, probably toward the worst end of the scale. It's not "normal" but it's not terribly unusual either.Cad, without asking you what type of law you practice, in your opinion, is that just normal animosity displayed by the judge to the defense or is their evidence of the judge really personally having issues with the defense?
Don't know if you understand my question.