Lightyear (2022)
- Thread starter Ravishing
- Start date
-
Guest, it's time once again for the massively important and exciting FoH Asshat Tournament!
Go here and give us your nominations!Who's been the biggest Asshat in the last year? Give us your worst ones!
j00t
Silver Baronet of the Realm
- 7,380
- 7,477
i actually heard there's a long-ish kiss between them as well...
i don't know how necessarily concerned i am with a lesbian character per se... but why do they have to have ANY kind of kissing or romance in a kid's movie? the lesbian/gay stuff gets amplified with that.
- 2
joz123
Potato del Grande
- 6,664
- 9,461
Chukzombi
Millie's Staff Member
- 73,121
- 214,408
its fucking pathetic. these toy story based films get more and more degraded with woke.
- 1
- 1
- 1
Big Phoenix
Pronouns: zie/zhem/zer
- 46,745
- 99,801
Remember that romantic kiss between Woody and Bo in Toy Story 4 when they finally realized their love for each other?
- 1
Chukzombi
Millie's Staff Member
- 73,121
- 214,408
Big Phoenix
Pronouns: zie/zhem/zer
- 46,745
- 99,801
I dont remember cucked, but she did make him look like a derpy retard due to her being perfect.
But its the general Disney sjw faggotry. MCU capshit filled with nothing but shirtless men but not a single woman in just a bra.
j00t
Silver Baronet of the Realm
- 7,380
- 7,477
you know i've been thinking about this lately. you have DECADES of hollywood turning women into nothing but sex objects (honestly, hollywood has been objectifying everything and everyone indiscriminately basically since it's inception, but that's another story), so having cap and thor running around all shirtless and muscly is a little bit of turnabout being fair play... but the thing that makes it interesting to me, is that men don't seem to care about being objectified. obviously i'm speaking about this in general terms, but take this clip for example...
it's all just a joke and no one cares, but if you did the reverse, where they guess actresses based on their body parts it'd feel offensive. i don't know WHY it is... i mean i could just say it's because men are more secure or whatever (which i don't necessarily believe), but there's DEFINITELY a difference in how men handle being objectified.
Malakriss
Golden Baronet of the Realm
- 12,719
- 12,015
Toy Story 4 Woody going full carnie-toy contradicted his character in Toy Story 3, much in the same way Wreck-It Ralph 2 Vanellope going internet game hopping contradicted Wreck-It Ralph's "going Turbo".
They are actively neutering existing themes and characters while injecting pandering and agendas but simultaneously trying to limit rule 34. Reminder, Space Jam 2 exists.
They are actively neutering existing themes and characters while injecting pandering and agendas but simultaneously trying to limit rule 34. Reminder, Space Jam 2 exists.
- 1
Chukzombi
Millie's Staff Member
- 73,121
- 214,408
for 3 movies, Woody risked his life to be together with his toy family, he was willing to be burned alive with them in TS3. TS4 ends with him ditching his toy family to be with the bitch who gives no fuck about any of it. he became her little bitch. he no longer had an identity, just what this harpy wanted him to do.
- 1
- 1
- 1
Big Phoenix
Pronouns: zie/zhem/zer
- 46,745
- 99,801
I don't care Thor is a completely unrealistic man at all. The issue is that they make Thor completely unrealistic all the while going out of their way to cover up women and say how bad women showing skin is.
Because men don't get jealous for the most part when we are shown a superior man. We want to know how to be that man. Arnold is a great example of that. Men looked at him and said how do I get jacked like Arnold? Women are insecure and neurotic so they cry and scream sexism.
- 1
TheNozz
Bronze Baron of the Realm
- 8,103
- 42,278
From what I understand, they originally left the scene out, but reinstated it in response to the parental rights bill that florida passed.
Arbitrary
Tranny Chaser
- 29,711
- 82,467
Women in that position only care when they start running out of road.
- 1
Chukzombi
Millie's Staff Member
- 73,121
- 214,408
So make sure to prove Desantis right. What a travesty they are
- 1
- 1
- 1
Chukzombi
Millie's Staff Member
- 73,121
- 214,408
what they thought
deadline.com
reality
www.indiewire.com
This weekend also contains the biggest disappointment of 2022 as Disney’s “Lightyear” grossed $51 million, falling far short of its projected minimum $70 million opening. That led to the total take of $163 million, a bit under expectations, for a weekend with three major recent releases.
“Lightyear” failed to open at #1, falling short of “Jurassic World: Dominion” (Universal), which dropped 60 percent to $58.6 million after opening to $145 million. That’s slightly more than the second weekend fall for the last “Jurassic,” which didn’t have the benefit of a Father’s Day.
“Top Gun: Maverick” (Paramount) remains stellar. In its fourth weekend, it dropped only 15 percent for $44 million. That gets it to $466 million domestic, with a $600 million total or more now looking likely. It is rare to gross that much for its fourth weekend; for the #3 film to be at that level, rarer still.
‘Lightyear’ To Blast Off With $135M WW As Summer Box Office Rebound Continues
Box Office: 'Lightyear' To Blast Off to $135M Global Opening
deadline.com
Box Office Thrives with ‘Maverick’ and Struggles with ‘Lightyear’ as Theaters Live and Die by Blockbusters
It was a $163 million weekend, 20 percent better than 2019 — but after "Doctor Strange" at #4, theater attendance plummeted.
www.indiewire.com
“Lightyear” failed to open at #1, falling short of “Jurassic World: Dominion” (Universal), which dropped 60 percent to $58.6 million after opening to $145 million. That’s slightly more than the second weekend fall for the last “Jurassic,” which didn’t have the benefit of a Father’s Day.
“Top Gun: Maverick” (Paramount) remains stellar. In its fourth weekend, it dropped only 15 percent for $44 million. That gets it to $466 million domestic, with a $600 million total or more now looking likely. It is rare to gross that much for its fourth weekend; for the #3 film to be at that level, rarer still.
- 2
