I want to know how you slit throats, stab, strangle, rape, and shoot and leave zero DNA evidence where the crime supposedly occurred. These two aren't Dexter, they're both borderline retarded.
Yeah, well.... spoiler alertsYou don't. It's pretty much impossible unless you're a seasoned forensics investigator and have the chemicals and know how. Clearly they are not that. The other troubling thing is the excused juror in episode 10 basically coming out and saying he was excused because he wouldn't cooperate with a guilty verdict. Because he wasn't an inbred hillbilly and used logic to see that there was no way there wasn't reasonable doubt involved here.
It's also super fucked up that a prosecutor is allowed to hold a news conference before the trial and paint a gruesome picture of what they think happened.I certainly believe that there was a tremendous amount of police misconduct in this case. I believe the police helped the case against Avery along by planting evidence (and there's no doubt in my mind that they planted the RAV4 key in Avery's trailer). I also don't believe the prosecution's theory of events: There's no way Halbach was raped and had her throat slashed in the trailer without a speck of DNA evidence, and there's no way she was shot in the garage without any blood splatter evidence. After all, if Avery had somehow used bleach to erase all trace of Halbach's DNA, he would've also cleaned the garage of his own DNA (and the garage still contained lots of Avery's DNA).
did this guy spoil the first season of serial at the end there?This points out a few pieces of evidence that the documentary didn't focus on or mention. Without context or hearing the arguments it is hard to say how it impacts my thoughts on the trial.
no bad tactics, only bad targets.I just don't understand, how the fuck do you live with yourself when you do this? Not the murder, obviously just starting episode 4 I have no idea if the guy did it or not. But they straight up railroaded him for the rape. 18 years, bros.
He's also retarded. 73 iq. The nephew is clocking a 72 iq. He's just older, though he's spent almost his entire adult life in prison. As a retard.no bad tactics, only bad targets.
he is poor, uneducated, and has a history of violence.
I don't think he had a history of violence, just a history of non violent criminal activity (burglary). I could be remembering that wrong though.no bad tactics, only bad targets.
he is poor, uneducated, and has a history of violence.