male rape survivors

  • Guest, it's time once again for the massively important and exciting FoH Asshat Tournament!



    Go here and give us your nominations!
    Who's been the biggest Asshat in the last year? Give us your worst ones!
Araysar

Loser Araysar

Chief Russia Reporter. Stock Pals CEO. Head of AI.
<Gold Donor>
81,157
162,338
ching chong,

Would you consider losing your virginity to jerle?
 
Araysar

Loser Araysar

Chief Russia Reporter. Stock Pals CEO. Head of AI.
<Gold Donor>
81,157
162,338
before_after60.jpg
 
iannis

iannis

Musty Nester
31,351
17,657
So the answer is...

a resounding yes.


Is there an oriental fashion to pluck your eyebrows/eyelashes? Those don't always grow back. kekekekekeke
 
fanaskin

fanaskin

Well known agitator
<Silver Donator>
55,976
138,501
Tanoomba_sl said:
Addiction is a physical condition. There are symptoms of addiction that can be observed and measured. Whether or not someone admits to being addicted to drugs may have nothing to do whatsoever with whether or not they are addicted.

Empowerment is a state of mind determined entirely by the one being empowered. If a porn star feels that the work she does empowers her, then nothing you or any third person could say would change the fact that, for her, being in porn is empowering. So yeah, when it comes to empowerment there's literally no time a third party observation matters.
Click to expand...
addiction is also a mental

My name is Jennie, and Im an addict. (Hello Jennie.) | Becoming Jennie

Pornography Does Lasting Harm to Performers - NYTimes.com
 
Lithose

Lithose

Buzzfeed Editor
25,946
113,036
Tanoomba_sl said:
No, seriously. I'm male, I have no reason to lie about being male, but most importantly:It makes no fucking difference whether or not I'm male.There are two reasons to "call me out" as a female:
1) As an insult. "You have a vagina! Ha ha ha!"
2) To imply that my opinion would somehow be less valid if I was a female.
Both these reasons are asinine and do nothing but express the ignorance of the speaker.
Click to expand...
Tanoomba_sl said:
What is this? What the fuck are you hypothesizing? "If women are granted the authority"... really? This is textbook MRA paranoia. "Them wimmins gon' take over and us men gon' be empty shells. Empty shells, hear?" When women actually have more global power than men do, which is to say that they are behind the most important political decisions and control most of the world's money, you'd be entirely right in complaining about their power. But when you speak from a position of privilege(Yes, I saidprivilege, ten billion snarky comments from assholes doesn't change the fact that men have greater privileges than women) andcomplain aboutsupposedprivileges those below you have that you're not happy about, it comes across as pathetic. Luckily, people are working towards trying to stabilize privilege across genders. Who are those people again?
Click to expand...
Tanoomba_sl said:
No, you didn't smell my bullshit.You're one of many tools that choose to ignore that you belong to a privileged groupbecause you think that means people think you're the bad guy (it doesn't, by the way).You and the rest of the fragile males who don't understand how privilege workslaugh and point at the sign-holders in your little circle-jerk, reassuring each other that all this "privilege" nonsense is just bullshit and not worthy of a moment's thought. Secure in your bubble where no differing opinions are allowed, you immediately dismiss any argument that mentions privilege because it doesn't gel with your deluded masturbatory world view. You're hardly a rare case, though, especially among plenty of other fragile egos equally unwilling to admit they belong to a privileged group. I'm sure any minute the cavalry will come in to lick your wounds and reassure you that I'm just a whipped pussyfaggot who buys into media-feuled feminist hysteria, and that really, again, it's men who get the short end of the stick.
Click to expand...
I'm curious Tan; which is it? Does the gender of the speaker only matter when it's men commenting on male placement in the world? Because it seems like at first, during Kirun's admitted sophomoric attacks on your gender, you vehemently rejected the use of gender as an ad hominem for prejudice against opinions on gender issues. In other words, you stated,it doesn't matter what gender we are; our opinions on issues should not be looked at differently due to that(As that would be ignorant).

Yet, in following replies, you quite often assume the opponent is male--andthenassume his distaste for the term "privilege" is centered around his gender. What's worse, you then attempt to use prejudicial language within your statement to degrade the weight of his opinion based solely on the fact that he is a male, commenting on a subject. For example: Kirun is "pathetic" because he belongs to said privileged class (Through his gender) and is daring to comment on "privilege"; and Lejina is a "tool" with a "fragile ego" that can't cope (Again, because they are male and born into privilege). As you can see;you use the very fact that they are men, to attempt to illustrate the "pathetic" nature of them commenting on an argument about gender.

So I'm just very curious. When is it "okay" to use gender to invalidate someone's opinion? Is it only okay when it assumes the guise of privilege? Why? Isn't privilege just a pseudonym for gender in this case? All evidence seems to point to this conclusion; as none of the other circumstances the posters may have seemed to matter in regards to you being able to lump them into the privileged class--so therefor, we can assume "privilege" (At least in your arguments here)=male. And if so, again, why is it okay to use them being "male" to, as you said in your original post, take validity from their opinion? And I agree with your original point, vehemently; gender shouldn't impact the argument. It's not right to ignore a woman under the auspices of her belonging to the female sex. But I'm confused why so many feminists (I assure you, you're not alone) believe it's okay to do it to men.
 
Arbitrary

Arbitrary

Tranny Chaser
29,621
82,109
If you divide this further and include race white women havehellaprivilege and black men are proper fucked. White women are goddamn bulletproof.

rrr_img_66327.jpg
 
A

Antarius

Lord Nagafen Raider
1,828
15
Well duh, getting back to the topic at hand... You can't lock up women in prison, they might get raped, and that would be bad.
 
TrollfaceDeux

TrollfaceDeux

Pronouns: zie/zhem/zer
<Bronze Donator>
19,577
3,743
one of more interesting thesis I read is that the society generally gravitates punishing men more than women because of how the law was set in the first place. Since men are the doers in the public sphere, whatever hideous act men may commit, these are classified as criminal offense. Whatever women do, however, is not. Abandonment of your child, for instance, could mean death. Now, it is your right.

Rape is a great example of how this is exemplified. Rape occurs because of unconsentedpenetrationto many state's laws. Penetration implies very simple following. That there must be an object that would penetrate a genital organ. Already, the law is heavily thwarted against men since men are the ones who penetrate the most and the victim must be the one with a genital organ that is penetrable.

Recent changes in law, driven by feminists, did make that into a more gender equal specifics and took out any mention of genders. Penetration still remains, though. Language remains to be consistent in gender specific and feminists still use same bogus bullshit stats to back their crusade against rape for men (1 in 6 or 5).
 
A

Antarius

Lord Nagafen Raider
1,828
15
Trollface_sl said:
Patriarchy.
Click to expand...
Err, its actually the exact same reason that Chris had to stop being friends with women in his story, and its what kirun explained a few pages back. Its because women, all women, lack the capability of empathy with men. It was a really difficult concept for me to grasp, a few years back, but once I realized that, it brought the world into far greater clarity than what I had previously thought. Beond any hormone, or physical differences, I would argue that empathy is the greatest divider between what defines a woman, and what defines a man.

Edit: to expand and answer lithose's question, basically, women marginalize men, because "real men" wouldn't be offended nor, in actuality, even be having this type of conversation with them at all. Because you are not of interest to her reproductive needs, aka "whining" your opinion is less valid, and women use dismissive language because those men are of a lower social status. If she wanted to fuck you, your opinion on gender would become her opinion, and there would be no arguement, because biology...no different than how many of the most famous femists end up marrying the richest and most powerful men. They can't fight biology, they simply aren't attracted to men with lower sexual market value.

TL;DR: women think its pathetic when men complain because they don't want to fuck men with problems. Men that don't complain are more attractive to women because a more successful man has nothing to complain about, because he's #winning

War Brides |

Empathy |
 
TrollfaceDeux

TrollfaceDeux

Pronouns: zie/zhem/zer
<Bronze Donator>
19,577
3,743
Antarius_sl said:
Antarius_sl said:
Err, its actually the exact same reason that Chris had to stop being friends with women in his story, and its what kirun explained a few pages back. Its because women, all women, lack the capability of empathy with men. It was a really difficult concept for me to grasp, a few years back, but once I realized that, it brought the world into far greater clarity than what I had previously thought. Beond any hormone, or physical differences, I would argue that empathy is the greatest divider between what defines a woman, and what defines a man.

Edit: to expand and answer lithose's question, basically, women marginalize men, because "real men" wouldn't be offended nor, in actuality, even be having this type of conversation with them at all. Because you are not of interest to her reproductive needs, aka "whining" your opinion is less valid, and women use dismissive language because those men are of a lower social status. If she wanted to fuck you, your opinion on gender would become her opinion, and there would be no arguement, because biology...no different than how many of the most famous femists end up marrying the richest and most powerful men. They can't fight biology, they simply aren't attracted to men with lower sexual market value.

TL;DR: women think its pathetic when men complain because they don't want to fuck men with problems. Men that don't complain are more attractive to women because a more successful man has nothing to complain about, because he's #winning

War Brides |

Empathy |
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
i would say so too. that post was a joke heh. I usually use sympathy as a mean of illustrating that I am affectionate to some degree to women nowadays. Get things done. I know it's bullshit but I do it anyhow since it's expected of me...

it's so odd for me to emphasize my step dad's struggle in this family while rest of female members in my family doesn't.

EDIT: man, starting to think tanoob may be a woman for real lol. that'd be hilarious. I once PMed aamina when everyone was attacking him and shit, for him to walk away and stuff. Don't remember his response exactly, but I don't think I liked it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.