The sad thing is he probably won't even if it was crystal clear he did it with 70 eye witnesses testifying that they saw him blast the guy and it nullifies the entire fucking purpose of having a legal system (people not being able to do whatever the fuck they want because they feel like it)You guys make it sound like he was found guilty.
You mean if the circumstances were different, people might have a different opinion? Surely you jest. But the circumstances aren't different. The guy was at over twice the legal limit, he did run these kids down (he didn't even brake), and he got shot. Whether the dad shot him honestly isn't clear from the evidence which is why he was found innocent. But if he did shoot him? Yeah, I'm OK with that given these specific circumstances.I'm amazed that everyone thinks it's fine to kill someone, for any reason, (and talks it up like getting away with it is somehow an achievement and justice) while simultaneously crying 10,000 tears of rage every time a cop does anything at all to someone doing something equally as stupid as drunk driving or more-so like waving guns around a fucking walmart (fake or not) or resisting arrest, or rioting, or etc. etc. etc.
I'd also be willing to be that at least 90% of the posters in this thread have driven drunk, by the legal definition, more than once or fifty times in their lives. Where are your roadside executions?
Would it have been wrong for the father to shoot him if the driver wasn't drunk and it was just a general car accident? What if the father caused the accident but still shot the guy because his kids died and he blamed the other driver, is it justice then?
Your sentence makes it sound like you are not aware that the trial is over. He was found not guilty. I still haven't heard of any evidence for his guilt other than motive and possibly opportunity. Were there any witnesses who said he did it? All I heard about was witnesses who said he went to the driver's door and briefly shouted at him before going back and tending to his son.The sad thing is he probably won't even if it was crystal clear he did it with 70 eye witnesses testifying that they saw him blast the guy and it nullifies the entire fucking purpose of having a legal system (people not being able to do whatever the fuck they want because they feel like it)
The whole point of the law is that opinion is supposed to be fucking irrelevant. The law is the law is the law and it doesn't (shouldn't) change based on whatever the fuck people feel is "justified" or "right" at any given moment.You mean if the circumstances were different, people might have a different opinion?
So you have zero experience with our legal system then, got it. DAs pick and choose what will and won't be prosecuted, even if something is against the law (example: kids taking nude pictures of themselves is technically child pornography, not all cases of this are prosecuted). That is the first step. There are quite a few, all of which are influenced by opinions of the people executing that particular step. Now they use prior decisions as a guide post for the most part, but don't let that fool you, the law is not some eternal absolute by any stretch. I mean, if you've ever broken any law and didn't happen to get caught, or got caught and didn't have any penalty imposed (say, speeding, and the cop let you off or speeding and you never got caught), you're really on the wrong side of this by your own standards.The whole point of the law is that opinion is supposed to be fucking irrelevant. The law is the law is the law and it doesn't (shouldn't) change based on whatever the fuck people feel is "justified" or "right" at any given moment.
As for whether or not it is acceptable to take a life, no I don't think it ever is. Are there things that I would kill for/about? Absolutely. I'd also fully expect to be punished for it and could accept it gladly.
Didn't know it was over, I don't follow stories like this much and I didn't read this entire thread. No evidence then no evidence can't really say much about that but i'm sure a lot of people would have ignored evidence if it was presented which is the problem I have with shit like this.
i'm asian and i drive a civicI'd also be willing to be that at least 90% of the posters in this thread have driven drunk, by the legal definition, more than once or fifty times in their lives. Where are your roadside executions?
Please tell me that it looks like something from Tokyo Drift!i'm asian and i drive a civic
with that stereotype,
Yes, DAs pick and choose, just like cops pick and choose, etc. etc. Doesn't make it right, tho, just makes it the way it is.So you have zero experience with our legal system then, got it. DAs pick and choose what will and won't be prosecuted, even if something is against the law (example: kids taking nude pictures of themselves is technically child pornography, not all cases of this are prosecuted).
So you'd kill, but think it was unacceptable. That is just hypocrisy. I have zero respect for that.