How much of the aupair's costs are tax deductible? I assumed it was 100% because it's child care. In that case the tax rates wouldn't play into the calculation.
So we're looking at paying $20-$30k per year. Median household income is $67k in the US. If you figure mom and dad are both making the same money (I know they're not, but it makes the "let someone else raise your child" argument stronger, so whatever), that's mom going to work to earn $33k/year to pay an aupair $20k. Then you factor in extra gas, lunches, work clothes, ordering out for dinner more nights (unless an aupair also cooks) and just generally not being able to manage the household.
20 years ago my sister gave up a job making around $40 - $50k per year to be home with her kids. They broke even with the money she saved from managing the house and not paying for childcare. That was pretty extreme, but that was also a really high salary back then. That's why I say people don't realize all the small expenses associated with going to work that really add up.
First off: You place a very low value on raising your own kids. We'll have to agree to disagree on that point.
Second, I'm not sure what % of jobs this would be career suicide for. My sister was a district manager. Once her kids were off in school, she got another job and was on her way to district manager for a bigger company again in less than a year. Seems like this is a small % of jobs the career suicide thing would apply to. I think your argument is stronger if we were talking about homeschooling.
So we're looking at paying $20-$30k per year. Median household income is $67k in the US. If you figure mom and dad are both making the same money (I know they're not, but it makes the "let someone else raise your child" argument stronger, so whatever), that's mom going to work to earn $33k/year to pay an aupair $20k. Then you factor in extra gas, lunches, work clothes, ordering out for dinner more nights (unless an aupair also cooks) and just generally not being able to manage the household.
20 years ago my sister gave up a job making around $40 - $50k per year to be home with her kids. They broke even with the money she saved from managing the house and not paying for childcare. That was pretty extreme, but that was also a really high salary back then. That's why I say people don't realize all the small expenses associated with going to work that really add up.
Edit: and even if it did approach it, how does it make sense to have a person sitting at home not developing their career for the 5-7 years it takes your kids to be in full time school? What are they gonna do after that? You hamstring their career and cost yourself hundreds of thousands or millions of dollars when you can't get them back to work later or they just get shitty jobs because they're 35 and no/little experience...
How is that a good plan? Put her to work and let the kids go to school, sheesh. Stay at home mom has absolutely nothing to do all day once they are in 1st grade.
First off: You place a very low value on raising your own kids. We'll have to agree to disagree on that point.
Second, I'm not sure what % of jobs this would be career suicide for. My sister was a district manager. Once her kids were off in school, she got another job and was on her way to district manager for a bigger company again in less than a year. Seems like this is a small % of jobs the career suicide thing would apply to. I think your argument is stronger if we were talking about homeschooling.
- 1