yeah, he nails the body language. so cagey throughout the movie. Afraid to touch anything or anyone.Norton didn't have a scene like this. It's not to say he couldn't manage it, he's a very capable actor, but he wouldn't have done it any better.
Second time I've read that in this thread, but it was not a stand alone film. It's very much part of the MCU Phase 1. There is an after credit scene with Tony Stark.I miss Ed Norton as Hulk, i really loved that stand alone film especially after the abortion of a first attempt.
yep, thats why there was no backstory for hulk in avengers. he is already an established character. i also think ed norton's hulk is a semi sequel to to eric bana's hulk.Second time I've read that in this thread, but it was not a stand alone film. It's very much part of the MCU Phase 1. There is an after credit scene with Tony Stark.
Not only was it connected to the MCU, but didn't it also kind of build on the shitty Hulk from 2003? I remember Ed Norton's Hulk starts off with him living abroad already as the Hulk, without any explanation of how he got there or became the Hulk.Second time I've read that in this thread, but it was not a stand alone film. It's very much part of the MCU Phase 1. There is an after credit scene with Tony Stark.
And as you said, that was of Marvel's own making. The industry was so messed up in the 90's. I was one of those guys who bought every variant cover, thinking that it would be a good investment.Marvel was on deaths door when all those deals were made, also this was the only way to even get a spiderman movie since it was in rights limbo, with carolco pictures, james cameron directing and scripting the movie with a cursing mutherfucker peter parker jizzing spider fluid wet dreams and banging MJ cosplay style overlooking ny.
plus marvel never made a movie, there was no marvel studios, no track record, they're a comic book company that creates IP, they should just license out their IP and try to make bank that way.
What were they in the 90's? they were shit, along with every other comic book company cuz they all produced shit upon shit and tanked their own industry.
He didn't mean that kind of "stand alone". He means it wasn't connected to the first hulk.Second time I've read that in this thread, but it was not a stand alone film. It's very much part of the MCU Phase 1. There is an after credit scene with Tony Stark.
Well, that makes a shitload more sense to me as to why Marvel agreed to it. They basically just have to produce a movie for free, and they get everything else they wanted. Perfect.http://variety.com/2015/film/news/de...es-1201429039/
Variety is reporting that the deal between Marvel and Sony involved essentially no money changing hands between the studios. Marvel is paying no licensing fee to Sony to get Spider-Man for the MCU-something that was reportedly a sticking point in the previous negotiations-and will not surrender any money from Civil War to the studio for Spidey's involvement. In return, Marvel gets no cut of Sony's Spider-Man films. Marvel Studios head Kevin Feige will not be compensated for producing Sony's new Spider-Man film.