Matrix prequel trilogy in the works for 2017

  • Guest, it's time once again for the massively important and exciting FoH Asshat Tournament!



    Go here and give us your nominations!
    Who's been the biggest Asshat in the last year? Give us your worst ones!
ohkcrlho

ohkcrlho

Silver Baronet of the Realm
6,906
8,943
Famm_sl said:
ZvkPVKq.jpg


Not sure what Batman they are talking about, but if its Nolan's they have 1 & 2 backwards.
Click to expand...
my opinion:

Star Wars - i still prefer Return of the Jedi to New Hope, so 2>3>1
Indiana Jones - 3>1>2
Matrix - correct
Star Trek - not a fan,never saw it.
Superman - all bad
Jurassic Park -correct
X-men - 3 should be negative
Spider-man - hate the 2nd and 3rd movies
LOTR - not a fan but....3=2>>>>1
Mad Max - 2>1>>>>>>3
Jaws - there is a 3rd movie?LOL
Back to the future - 3rd movie i really don't like it
Die Hard - 1>3>2
Blade - 1>>>>>2=3
Planet of the Apes - i only have seen 3: the '68 movie,the one with mark wahlberg (awful) and Rise of the planet of the apes.so it goes: '68>Rise>>>>>>>>>>marky mark

Godfather - 1>2>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>3
Rocky - there are 6(LOL) but between the 1st 3, 1>3>2
Terminator - i only know 2 and 1>>2
Rambo - 1>3>2
Batman - old ones right? 1>2>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>3
Batman (Nolan) - 2>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>1. 3 doesn't exist for me
Alien - 1>2>>>3
 
ohkcrlho

ohkcrlho

Silver Baronet of the Realm
6,906
8,943
and:

Robocop - 1>>>>>2>>>>>>do not compute
Predator - 1>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>2>predators.
Starship Troopers - 1,the other 2 are unwatchable
Bourne - 2>3>1
Iron Man - 1 and that's it
Lethal Weapon - 2>3>1>4 (not a triology i know)
Mexico Trilogy - El Mariachi> Once upon > desperado
 
Gavinmad

Gavinmad

Mr. Poopybutthole
44,218
53,325
Also, Jurassic Park 3 is much better than 2. The Raptor nightmare still cracks me up every time I see it.
 
E

etchazz

Trakanon Raider
2,707
1,056
i totally disagree with terminator 2 being better than the first, and die hard 2 sucked donkey balls. the rest i can agree with.
 
Arbitrary

Arbitrary

Tranny Chaser
30,433
85,834
T1 and T2 are both very, very good and for different reasons. T2 just has the crazy mainstream commercial success so it gets a nod.
 
Chukzombi

Chukzombi

Millie's Staff Member
73,831
215,702
the storyline in t2 is basically a mirror of t1. t2 has top notch stan winston effects but the movie is hurt by the presence of john connor and shit like "why do you cry?" t1 has pretty good special effects for its time, but its a little dull in some spots. t2 is just balls to the walls spare no expense excess and their CGI looks pretty goddamned good even 20 years later. id say both movies are equally good, but cameron tried a lot harder with t2 and it shows.
 
E

etchazz

Trakanon Raider
2,707
1,056
Maester Chuk_sl said:
the storyline in t2 is basically a mirror of t1. t2 has top notch stan winston effects but the movie is hurt by the presence of john connor and shit like "why do you cry?" t1 has pretty good special effects for its time, but its a little dull in some spots. t2 is just balls to the walls spare no expense excess and their CGI looks pretty goddamned good even 20 years later. id say both movies are equally good, but cameron tried a lot harder with t2 and it shows.
Click to expand...
the storyline in T1 is much, much better. T1 is man vs. machine, T2 winds up being machine vs. machine (the terminator in the end winds up saving the day). also, the whole john connor being a whiny, punk brat was a bit much. and the terminator not allowed to kill anyone? are you kidding me? he's a terminator! and why in the hell would john connor send a terminator back in time to save his mother who is an exact replica of the one who was sent back to kill her??? not saying that T2 was entirely bad, but special effects aside, it doesn't come close to the original.
 
Kreugen

Kreugen

Vyemm Raider
6,599
793
Yeah, lots of people consider Star Trek 1/3 to be almost as good as ST2, and would rate them so high overall. And by lots of people I mean fucking nobody.

Unless that chart was supposed to be ST2, ST4, ST6.
 
Chukzombi

Chukzombi

Millie's Staff Member
73,831
215,702
etchazz_sl said:
the storyline in T1 is much, much better. T1 is man vs. machine, T2 winds up being machine vs. machine (the terminator in the end winds up saving the day). also, the whole john connor being a whiny, punk brat was a bit much. and the terminator not allowed to kill anyone? are you kidding me? he's a terminator! and why in the hell would john connor send a terminator back in time to save his mother who is an exact replica of the one who was sent back to kill her??? not saying that T2 was entirely bad, but special effects aside, it doesn't come close to the original.
Click to expand...
the t-1000 more than made up for the bodycount that arnold terminator did not do. john connor was the worst part of t2. both movies have the same plot.

x comes from the future to protect x from super killing machine. its the same thing. t2 wasnt machine versus machine only, it was man and machine version machine. yeah arnold saved the day, but he was reprogrammed by a human to save the day.
 
E

etchazz

Trakanon Raider
2,707
1,056
Maester Chuk_sl said:
the t-1000 more than made up for the bodycount that arnold terminator did not do. john connor was the worst part of t2. both movies have the same plot.

x comes from the future to protect x from super killing machine. its the same thing. t2 wasnt machine versus machine only, it was man and machine version machine. yeah arnold saved the day, but he was reprogrammed by a human to save the day.
Click to expand...
T2 would have been exponentially better if sarah connor sacrificed herself at the end and tackled the terminator into the molten steel, instead of arnold showing up at the last second and shooting the terminator and giving a cliche "i need a vacation" line.
 
spronk

spronk

FPS noob
23,694
27,787
they need to remake the terminator, starring shia labouf as john conner, will smith jr as the terminator, and the chick from twilight as sarah conner. skynet evolves from farmville and facebook.

wish negs were back, huh????
 
I

Itzena_sl

shitlord
4,609
6
Kreugen_sl said:
Yeah, lots of people consider Star Trek 1/3 to be almost as good as ST2, and would rate them so high overall. And by lots of people I mean fucking nobody.

Unless that chart was supposed to be ST2, ST4, ST6.
Click to expand...
Three was fine in itself, it was just overshadowed by two and four.
 
ohkcrlho

ohkcrlho

Silver Baronet of the Realm
6,906
8,943
Alex_sl said:
How can you say this? Three is pretty bad, but two is good. Not as good as the first, but it's certainly better than three by a wide margin.
Click to expand...
2 was just lazy (super zombies and blablabla).3 was more comedy than anything:

yes both were weak,maybe 2 is better than 3 but i didn't enjoy any of them

Arbitrary_sl said:
T1 and T2 are both very, very good and for different reasons. T2 just has thecrazy mainstream commercial successso it gets a nod.
Click to expand...
This.
T1 is more terror (unstoppable machine vs human).T2 is more action (similar to Alien/Aliens)
BUT.....T2 uses the same formula from the 1st movie: one baddie and one goddie use time travel to kill and to save a connor,respectively.so it's nothing new.great movie yes but T1 is superior.
 
Famm

Famm

Ahn'Qiraj Raider
11,041
794
I didn't really like the first Blade that much so I never watched a sequel.
 
chaos

chaos

Buzzfeed Editor
17,324
4,839
I liked Andy Garcia, his daughter was the only bad part really. That and the convoluted plot with the church and the corporation, it was kind of dense.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.