Fixednba isnt watchable till last 20 games and playoffs
just like baseball
I agree. NBA has a shitload of personality.It is far and away the most "fun" sport, it's just not as compelling as the NFL.
Are you going to games live or just viewing on tv? I ask because Idefinitelythink there is a complete 180 difference from an arena experience (probably even broadcast too there's more of a spectacle to playoffs on the TV for sure) between regular season and playoff basketball but if you break things down statistically there really isn't any in player production other than team scoring drops overall.i dunno i used to watch the nba regularly and I just dont find alot of the midseason games to be entertaining or as competitive as I would expect from a professional level sports league
Some good points here. Obviously if you eliminate the bottom half of each conference you're by default going to have more evenly matched teams playing each other. That alone leads to more exciting basketball. And coaching can definitely be seen simply by the pace of play dropping across the board as teams try and emphasize defense.Quality does go up in the postseason, but that's mostly because you don't have the worst half of the league playing games and coaches aren't going to worry as much about minutes. Also, it's hard to gameplan for a specific team during the regular season, whereas in the playoffs you're making adjustments from one game to the next and mini-rivalries develop. Playoffs are definitely more intense, but I'd rather watch regular season basketball now than any other sport (when my teams aren't involved). I wouldn't have said that a few years ago, though...the Isolation era was unwatchable for me, but the quality from team to team right now is about as high as I can remember it.
I probably go through about 2-3 games per day. I'm often working on my computer and not giving full attention, but I'm loving my League Pass.
Having watched Dirk for 13ish years in the playoffs, I know for a fact he plays better.
Called it!Now the way these arguments always go is people will now cherry pick like 3 example outliers of players who historically played better in the playoffs and tell me I'm wrong.
Just the eye test, I know Dirk is a better player in the playoffs - Not every shot is equal. 2011 wasn't his best statistical playoff run but he hit more clutch shots and passed out of double teams to open 3 point shooters before they even realized it was happening (something he was bad at earlier in his career). He hit game winning shots in crunch time twice vs Miami, twice vs OKC, and once vs Portland - all those shots count the same on the stat sheet.A few decades ago baseball sabermetrics had its revolution in part because analysts realized the game was only technically a team sport, and that it was more aptly dissected as a sequence of outcomes that involve sovereign performers competing in one-on-one encounters. But basketball exhibits the exact opposite nature and is in desperate need of a very different kind of analytical revolution. Unlike home runs or strikeouts, almost every basket, made or missed, in the NBA is the product of teamwork - coordinated and connected actions by multiple actors behaving (or in some cases, attempting to behave) as a unit. As a result, every basketball analysis that fails to account for the natural ecology of the game is inherently flawed - and to this point, almost all "advanced" analyses make no such ecological considerations.
Crunch time is actually a defined thing in the NBA.Man0warr is two posts away from defending QBR. Taking "clutch" shots into account.