"Maybe Lions or Cards in football"
Uhhh...Browns? Cleveland sports are brutal.
Even with things being different, they won one in 1964. They are close to the Lions but not quite as long of a drought.
- 1
"Maybe Lions or Cards in football"
Uhhh...Browns? Cleveland sports are brutal.
Code Orange: Karl-Anthony Towns, Timberwolves reportedly ‘not in a good place internally’
#1 pick for KAT? KAT & Booker?! Crazy shit.
I'd say you are a bit retarded but I've seen your posts in the NFL thread and already know it. Just to get this out of the way first. The jersey you wear...doesn't affect wins. We've seen in the past decade...Red Sox win it all, Cubs win it all, Cavs win it all. If you want to talk long droughts... talk to the Kings, Suns, or Hawks. Maybe the Lions or Cards in football. Definitely the Indians. Cavs were no where close in that discussion of snake bit, desperate teams. Next...
Thankfully, James didn't just hang his hat or we'd miss maybe another decade of brilliance. He didn't think that one was enough either...or the two previous. So why would we? You don't get to be GOAT from one season. That's....whew boy. What can I say? The current Warriors team is better for one. Four superstars always trumps three. Two, one championship(or even three) is hard to hang your hat on when one guy has over 10. Or one guy never lost, etc, etc, etc. You can put him in the discussion but your statement tops the cake in not only this thread...but competes for the whole site. Now, that's EPIC!
I thought about the Caps but my knowledge of hockey is limited. And I'm lazy as well.How about the Caps or even the Blues in hockey
Can't imagine Phoenix wanting to do that. With the #1 pick they have their choice of a couple guys that I think will be as good as Towns. The big difference is the guy you get with the pick will be under the first year of their rookie contract. Towns is a restricted FA next offseason, same time as Booker. So their payroll flexibility would die in one summer. Not bad players to build around, I just think you'd much prefer to take the younger guy and stagger things out for flexibility.
Hey Gaige, when was the last time you heard from Elkay? That old bastard.
Im talking about Lebrons legacy.
His 2016 triumph pretty much makes his credentials bullet proof, whether he adds to it or not. What the fuck is hard to understand about that?
How is that statement retarded? LeBron has played FIFTEEN seasons.
His career is in its final stages, his resume is almost figured out, the pieces of the puzzle are almost all in place.
He has one final act after he signs somewhere this summer, but if he doesn't win this year, or ever again, his legacy is still secured.
He will still go down as the 2nd best player of all time and will forever be known for vanquishing that epic Warriors team and lifting Cleveland to a title.
Instead of coming with some pussy ad hominem shit why don't you argue against my statement with some actual reasoning why I'm wrong?