Ambiturner
Ssraeszha Raider
- 16,155
- 19,755
I don't want to get into this too much but the problem is they clearly (on the first one at least) ruled against the precedent they had used all year long up until this point. Would not surprise me if it was not a command from up on high given the controversy of this year...
It's funny the people who i imagine would argue in favour of stare decisis in terms of the supreme court have no problem with the NFL front office suddenly changing interpretation of the rule when the season is still being played.
No they didn't. The rules may be dumb and unintuitive, but they're not nearly as complicated as people are acting