Blitz
<Bronze Donator>
- 6,054
- 6,724
No the argument is an average RB is worth 80% of a great one at a third to half the price.
The NFL clearly agrees too.
Jim Brown wheeps.
Offenses such as Dallas' or Washington's that are nearly totally dependent on rushing the ball (thanks to their QB's incredible arm talent...), the RB value is dramatically higher.
But yes, if you have a QB that can throw the ball 12 yards through the air, you're at bare minimum, probably better off, at most, drafting good young talented RBs every 4-5 years. If you land a true RB talent, these win-win RB deals seem to be the way of the future (Gurley & Johnson's deal).
It's football's slow movement to "7-on-7". Get a QB, and then just get shifty quick guys and put them in space. Reggie Bush was drafted a decade too early.
Last edited: