[NO Spoilers] Star Wars: Episode 7 - NO PUSSY SHIT

Chukzombi

Chukzombi

Millie's Staff Member
73,931
215,918
yeah they moved their new stuff to their own site quite a while ago. be sure to also watch the commentary on episode one 3d special edition. wear those blue/green and red glasses and sync up a copy of TPM SE and you should be GTG. its fucking hilarious.

-woops
i got 2 things mixed up. there is a 3d version of the original TPM review with some fun stuff added
Red Letter Media Star Wars: The Phantom Menace 3D :
then there is the hilarious commentary for the original Star Wars SE which you need to syn up with the star wars logo. they explain
Mr. Plinketts Star Wars Episode 4: A New Hope Commentary | Red Letter Media

one more woops, there is also an episode one commentary.
Mr. Plinketts Phantom Commentary Full | Red Letter Media
 
iannis

iannis

Musty Nester
31,351
17,660
redletter hasn't been dumping to youtube in a while. Geek and sundry also seems spotty with youtube.

My guess is that youtube is starting to try to take a cut for hosting pro-am webstuff. Which is only fair, but is also going to price some enterprises out. I can't think the redletter guys are actually making any money -- at best I would think they're subsidizing space cop.
 
Aaron

Aaron

Goonsquad Officer
<Silver Donator>
9,347
22,754
Jesus, that was amazing. Made me depressed. Depressed at how utter shit the prequels were. If only they would hire this guy to be some sort of creative director of the new films to make sure they're not fucking shit.
 
Caliane

Caliane

Avatar of War Slayer
15,918
12,559
Column_sl said:
Well CGI has come pretty far since the last Star Wars prequel.

Stop motion animation, and large models really aren't needed anymore.

It really comes down to the artists and the production crew anyway. They have the tools now to make everything super realistic. If they fail on that it has nothing to do with CGI limitations.
Click to expand...
have you seen paranorman?

3d printing has made stop motion 100x better and easier then it used to be. it should be used even MORE. CGI on top of stop motion would create amazing effects.



ps. Thor2 had some fantastic space battles, some real Starwars/masters of the universe stuff.
 
Bondurant

Bondurant

Ahn'Qiraj Raider
3,878
4,827
Hahaha, Eps 1-3 weren't at all about bad actors : Neeson / Portman / McGregor are talented fucks (Schindler's List, Leon, Trainspotting), main problem is Lucas here. While being a major lore creator / manager, the guy always had shitty film direction perks. He can't direct actors (lol both Neeson and McGregor), can't write (Anakin you're breaking my heart) and having hard times dealing with modern filmmaking (when you're actually directing people on stage). You loved Empire Strikes Back, SW iconic flick ? Well, he didn't direct it (Kirschner did).

Lucas is a shitty filmmaker. He's a hell of a lore writer and a franchise manager, but lacks anything else. SW1-3 were fully directed / written / produced by him. That's why 2000 years milestone movies are mostly about Lord Of The Rings, because no one cares about midichlorians, Jar-Jar and soap-opera drama. We care about story, acting and direction. No fucks are given upon who shots first, or if D2-R2 is well seen on that Tatooine rock set. If you enjoyed SW 1-3 it's bad and you should feel bad. If you need documentation you should readBiskind books.
 
Conefed

Conefed

Blackwing Lair Raider
2,850
1,702
Portman is a shit actor and her scenes in the movies were of the worst of the worst. In episodes 1-3, the good actors still looked good, but did so despite all else being bad.

I liked YouTube's BelatedMedia's version of the prequels.
 
iannis

iannis

Musty Nester
31,351
17,660
Portman is beautiful, and I think at one point she was a good actor working with interesting scripts. And I think Phantom Meanness is where that trend ended and she decided she'd rather be disgustingly rich, beautiful, and famous rather than just somewhat rich, beautiful, and famous.
 
Sterling

Sterling

El Presidente
13,140
8,110
I think she's decent but has somewhat limited range. She's good at certain types of roles but otherwise is fairly meh. That said even top notch actors had some pretty bad shit happening during the prequels.
 
ohkcrlho

ohkcrlho

Silver Baronet of the Realm
6,906
8,943
the script is awful (lucas' style of course) but Portman decided to make the scenes even worse.hayden chirurieureoiueroieu did the same shit.
their chemistry?oh gosh......cringeworthy
 
Xequecal

Xequecal

Trump's Staff
11,559
-2,388
Bondurant_sl said:
Hahaha, Eps 1-3 weren't at all about bad actors : Neeson / Portman / McGregor are talented fucks (Schindler's List, Leon, Trainspotting), main problem is Lucas here. While being a major lore creator / manager, the guy always had shitty film direction perks. He can't direct actors (lol both Neeson and McGregor), can't write (Anakin you're breaking my heart) and having hard times dealing with modern filmmaking (when you're actually directing people on stage). You loved Empire Strikes Back, SW iconic flick ? Well, he didn't direct it (Kirschner did).

Lucas is a shitty filmmaker. He's a hell of a lore writer and a franchise manager, but lacks anything else. SW1-3 were fully directed / written / produced by him. That's why 2000 years milestone movies are mostly about Lord Of The Rings, because no one cares about midichlorians, Jar-Jar and soap-opera drama. We care about story, acting and direction. No fucks are given upon who shots first, or if D2-R2 is well seen on that Tatooine rock set. If you enjoyed SW 1-3 it's bad and you should feel bad. If you need documentation you should readBiskind books.
Click to expand...
The dialogue in the original trilogy is just as bad as in the prequels.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.