bro...I'm pro just nuking the shit out of the north korean DMZ line
...
They're far too dangerous with a nuclear arsenal
bro...I'm pro just nuking the shit out of the north korean DMZ line
...
They're far too dangerous with a nuclear arsenal
WTF do you even have a clue, most of the crude that goes through the pipeline is sent to American refineries and can't be exported under law since 2004, and previously from 96 to 04 only about 10% of the total in those years was exported to the Far East. Alex jones has failed you.Of course they are fine we made them part of our economic system for globalization, we control them through our oil, All the Alaskan pipeline oil goes directly to Japan America doesn't use any of it, Remember japan went to war in WWII to start an empire, they wanted access to oil and we provoked japan into war by revoking our sales of oil to japan. We made Japan was for a long time a equivilent to a vassel state.
They'd object to American military intervention. Shit, Americans would object to American intervention.Maybe I'm alone in this, but I'm pro just nuking the shit out of the north korean DMZ line then just driving right into North Korea and ending this. They're far too dangerous with a nuclear arsenal and their concentration camps are just disgusting. The fact that the world has let this go on as long as it is just ridiculous. I don't even think China would object to some sort of military intervention at this point.
Define dangerous and disgusting pleaseMaybe I'm alone in this, but I'm pro just nuking the shit out of the north korean DMZ line then just driving right into North Korea and ending this. They're far too dangerous with a nuclear arsenal and their concentration camps are just disgusting.
The fact that they're willing to let millions starve to maintain their iron grip over a nation? They lock up families for the acts of a single member, for decades at a time.. not even immediate.. you, your cousins your relatives.. everyone gets locked up. There are children who never know what it is to live outside a concentration camp, they will literally live and die there. Inside those camps they use people for human experimentation, anything from live dissections to chemical weapon tests. They guards use the woman as sex slaves and will commonly make said sex slaves disappear if they become pregnant. So now that we have the disgusting part out of the way..Define dangerous and disgusting please
China and the US crafted the latest sanctions that brought about the end of the armistice. China is done with them, but more than likely when they call no one in North Korea is picking up anymore.Reminder: North Korea has enough artillery heavily fortified on their side of the border to shell Seoul flat in about two hours. They don'tneedto nuke anyone if all they want is a blaze of glory. This is their typical sabre-waving, triggered this time by the fact that China is beginning to get tired of them and is going to side with the US in the next round of sanctions.
man I really hoped you'd respond with "uses nukes first".The fact that they're willing to let millions starve to maintain their iron grip over a nation? They lock up families for the acts of a single member, for decades at a time.. not even immediate.. you, your cousins your relatives.. everyone gets locked up. There are children who never know what it is to live outside a concentration camp, they will literally live and die there. Inside those camps they use people for human experimentation, anything from live dissections to chemical weapon tests. They guards use the woman as sex slaves and will commonly make said sex slaves disappear if they become pregnant. So now that we have the disgusting part out of the way..
Nuke the DMZ zone, I'm not saying carpet bomb north korea with nukes and destroy all of it's cities. I'm advocating using nuclear weapons to the current threat they pose to south korea via their artillery positions with the best weapons possible for destroying hardened targets.man I really hoped you'd respond with "uses nukes first".
And seriously, so you'd think these people are better off dead?
You attack NK with nukes, millions will die.
So from what I've read about these latest sanctions "the resolution bans all nations from exporting expensive jewelry, yachts, luxury automobiles and racing cars to the North" (I'd love to post the original text of the resolution but un.org is a piece of shit site and won't load). So if further sanctions are going to follow this model I have a hard time seeing how the civilian population will ever feel their impact. More likely than not Mr. Un is trying to test the waters with a new Secretary of State in the US, new leadership in China and South Korea while at the same time profiling himself as defender of the people in North Korea.The trouble is, if this is posturing, it's just going to result in further sanctions, including sanctions from China and Russia. That's going to hurt the civilian population. Badly.
I'm no expert but I don't think this is correct. A few months ago I read an article describing why the US can't simply neutralize their artillery positions, but it largely has to do with:Maybe Im going all Fringe here, but Im sure the US and China have all their artillery hotspots all mapped out with satellite imagery. And we could essentially render their entire arsenal useless within a matter of hours before they even know how to react.
I feel the same way, one bomber run with several hundred planes pouring napalm/cluster bombs over the portion of the DMZ next to Seoul and there will barely be a NK soldier left to operate one of those howitzers. Thats the #1 threat being neutralized in few hours.Maybe Im going all Fringe here, but Im sure the US and China have all their artillery hotspots all mapped out with satellite imagery. And we could essentially render their entire arsenal useless within a matter of hours before they even know how to react.
I'm no expert but I don't think this is correct. A few months ago I read an article describing why the US can't simply neutralize their artillery positions, but it largely has to do with:
1. That we don't have them all mapped out.
2. That Seoul is so close to the border it's hard to neutralize all targets (known and unknown) before severe loss of life in SK occurs.
3. They have so much artillery in hardened locations that it'd be very difficult to use enough ordinance to neutralize it.
Yes, the sanctions have been limited to things that will more affect the leadership than the general populationthus far. But imagine what happens if they keep this shit up? You know some basic necessities are going to get sanctioned before long. This move will hurt the population in general.So from what I've read about these latest sanctions "the resolution bans all nations from exporting expensive jewelry, yachts, luxury automobiles and racing cars to the North" (I'd love to post the original text of the resolution but un.org is a piece of shit site and won't load). So if further sanctions are going to follow this model I have a hard time seeing how the civilian population will ever feel their impact. More likely than not Mr. Un is trying to test the waters with a new Secretary of State in the US, new leadership in China and South Korea while at the same time profiling himself as defender of the people in North Korea.
Very true. And then they'll deploy ground forces we'll never be able to find. It's going to be messy.Maybe Im going all Fringe here, but Im sure the US and China have all their artillery hotspots all mapped out with satellite imagery. And we could essentially render their entire arsenal useless within a matter of hours before they even know how to react.
~35 miles at the closest point.Tripamang, how close to Seoul is the DMZ zone(sic)?