* Moderator request to please change supertouch title to "biochemist/lipid researcher"
requests denied.This subforum should be renamed to "place to post stupid shit with the hope that you'll be shielded from well-deserved trolling".
Seconded. Only a matter of time before lolCrossfit made its way in this thread.Request to have this thread title changed to "Fitness and Diet For Retards".
post a video of those hippies who follow a real diet.Thats paleo logic so dont worry. They want to emulate the diet of cavemen but consume refined/manufactured oils(butter, olive oil) no problem.
And again this is the type of comment that leads to repeated failure. Yes congratulations, you've regurgitated the conservation of energy as it applies to diet and think you've got it all covered. And that's as far as your brain wants to go because it gets hard when things get complicated. Yeah you can lose weight with caloric restriction and will you be healthy? Will the weight come back? Most people gain back the weight they lose in most diets.Either way you will lose weight, if the net caloric output is negative.
Do you superset your kettlebell exercises with squat thrusts and lifting huge triangular iron weights?Whomever said Kettlebells is a dumb fad is a fucking moron.
That is all.
Those are trapezoids, bro, do you even lift?!Do you superset your kettlebell exercises with squat thrusts and lifting huge triangular iron weights?
Geometry burn?Those are trapezoids, bro, do you even lift?!
I love that you keep talking about "health" but are pushing the paleo diet.And again this is the type of comment that leads to repeated failure. Yes congratulations, you've regurgitated the conservation of energy as it applies to diet and think you've got it all covered. And that's as far as your brain wants to go because it gets hard when things get complicated. Yeah you can lose weight with caloric restriction and will you be healthy? Will the weight come back? Most people gain back the weight they lose in most diets.
So hey, maybe there is something people are missing. Now a slightly more thoughtful individual would expand their calorie in/out with the whole "toxic" environment argument. This is the argument that people are fat because there is more cheap junk food around, McDonalds and Coke and candy etc, and we have more disposable income to spend on this food.. And we're more sedentary, more video games, cars, desk jobs.
Pretty compelling argument, until you start to look at other groups of people who were very obese and had no money, no junk food, and were physically active. Or people who switch to the western diet and suddenly get increases in heart disease and diabetes.
Then you might start to think, as I do, that maybe it's the sugar and processed flour and grains. Certainly the sugar. But hey good luck on your coldstone creamery diet.
On the topic of morons.there's nothing unhealthy about it unless you're eating nothing but steak. stop being a moron.
there is literally no reason for you to eat grains
Dude, let it die already, just shut up. I am sure you walk around year round at 8% bodyfat, run a 4.4 40 yard dash and bench 400lbs, and your blood work is perfect, and I AM SO HAPPY FOR YOU. If Paleo works for you, I couldn't be happier, but stop peddling the shit like you are a Jehovah's Witness. You are preaching to a forum of video game nerds, how much success do you really think you are going to have? For every 1 person who is a member on this site there are 9 who have never exercised a day in their life. 23 pages of nonsense.And again this is the type of comment that leads to repeated failure. Yes congratulations, you've regurgitated the conservation of energy as it applies to diet and think you've got it all covered. And that's as far as your brain wants to go because it gets hard when things get complicated. Yeah you can lose weight with caloric restriction and will you be healthy? Will the weight come back? Most people gain back the weight they lose in most diets.
So hey, maybe there is something people are missing. Now a slightly more thoughtful individual would expand their calorie in/out with the whole "toxic" environment argument. This is the argument that people are fat because there is more cheap junk food around, McDonalds and Coke and candy etc, and we have more disposable income to spend on this food.. And we're more sedentary, more video games, cars, desk jobs.
Pretty compelling argument, until you start to look at other groups of people who were very obese and had no money, no junk food, and were physically active. Or people who switch to the western diet and suddenly get increases in heart disease and diabetes.
Then you might start to think, as I do, that maybe it's the sugar and processed flour and grains. Certainly the sugar. But hey good luck on your coldstone creamery diet.
grains provide absolutely nothing you can't get from more nutrient-dense foods. why do you keep chiming in with your caloric intake nonsense when no one is even talking about weight loss? you're not very smart.On the topic of morons.
Bro don't break my brain with this 1 = 9 shit.For every 1 person who is a member on this site there are 9 who have never exercised a day in their life.
He's definitely no "biochemist/lipid researcher." - LOLgrains provide absolutely nothing you can't get from more nutrient-dense foods. why do you keep chiming in with your caloric intake nonsense when no one is even talking about weight loss? you're not very smart.