Bradtheon: A ship of theseus where only god-emperor brad remains constant.Brad has went through so many team members at this point
Bradtheon: A ship of theseus where only god-emperor brad remains constant.Brad has went through so many team members at this point
To you and the other 13 people who were playing it.Nothing wrong with that. VG was the best game on the market before it was funsetted
That's a big reason VG was so buggy at release: far too large a world, too many systems.Not at all but it's a concern. The scope of pantheon started to worry the old team. The game just kept getting bigger and that seems to have carried over. It just increases the cost and time it takes to make the game. What game!?
It was more than that. Scope being large was fine. It had to do with leadership and the people in place. Had blizzard set out to make VG, I'd image they'd pull it off.That's a big reason VG was so buggy at release: far too large a world, too many systems.
It was a technical shit show. I had dual 8800gtx at the time and getting above 30fps was a miracle.That's a big reason VG was so buggy at release: far too large a world, too many systems.
The scope being large was caused by the management problems relatedly the lag issues could have been addressed if the scope hadn't been so large and if Brad had done the smart thing and focused on the engine instead of spending 30 million on Art when the engine was still fubar.It was more than that. Scope being large was fine. It had to do with leadership and the people in place. Had blizzard set out to make VG, I'd image they'd pull it off.
So...extremely poor leadership led to bad decisions and very poor results.The scope being large was caused by the management problems relatedly the lag issues could have been addressed if the scope hadn't been so large and if Brad had done the smart thing and focused on the engine instead of spending 30 million on Art when the engine was still fubar.
That and a poor choice in engine.So...extremely poor leadership led to bad decisions and very poor results.
Hey if we can argue and bring up old school EQ every other day, why not Vanguard?Didnt we have this VG was a failure because it ran like shit thread back in 2007-2008? LOL
I don't know what you guys find so objectionable about this. Of all the kinds of gold, I've always thought that false gold was the worst...
Everquest was a success.Hey if we can argue and bring up old school EQ every other day, why not Vanguard?
From 2005-2007 we had the "why Vanguard will suck" and, alternatively, the "why Vanguard will be the second coming" thread that never left the front page of fohguild for those years.Didnt we have this VG was a failure because it ran like shit thread back in 2007-2008? LOL