LordLime_sl
shitlord
- 19
- 0
The article is going to make or break the kickstarter.this pcgamer article going to be so awesome, solely due to the reaction here, cant wait.
The article is going to make or break the kickstarter.this pcgamer article going to be so awesome, solely due to the reaction here, cant wait.
I am genuinely curious who the fuck is out there that gets their gaming info from PC gamer magazine. I don't really understand most of the people here who want an oldschool DIKU and yet are in their 30s and 40s (I intellectually understand but its not a game I would ever play), but I can't even really begin to wrap my head around someone who is a PC gamer and has a print mag as their primary information source. Hell, until this thread I thought pc gamer had died long ago along with Computer Shopper and Nintendo Power.I am frustrated with PC Gamer. If what Brad says is true, they gave PC Gamer exclusive info and they are likely holding back on giving us more info until that article drops. It's a bad showing on PC Gamers part. Shame on them, this article is important for this Kickstarter.
this is a stupid argument. of course there are more than just a few thousand people who want an MMO more in line with EQ than any modern MMO. the problem is those of us who want a game like that didn't think we'd have to pay out of pocket to have it made. if a company decided to make a MMO similar to EQ, it would have plenty of subs. not saying it would reach WoW like numbers, but hell EQ had almost a half a million players and that was before most people even knew what a MMO was. a modern day MMO modeled after EQ could easily get a million subs (if done right). i think a lot of people are still hoping for that game. and a lot of people are just hoping that pantheon can be that game. whether or not it will be is completely unknown at this point.So something that's still stuck in my craw is a comment from a few pages back about how all this project needs is 8,000 backers at $100 a pop.
I'm looking at the number of backers and it's like 1.5x the population of P99 on a weekend. So, in all seriousness, are there even enough people who want this game to get it made? I mean we've all been saying for years how if they would just do another game right it would be awesome and we'd be all over it, but how many of "us" are there? Is it like a serious case of false consensus where it's literally just 2,000 people thinking everyone feels the same way?
Any thoughts?
psst.. many periodicals have popular websites these days.I am genuinely curious who the fuck is out there that gets their gaming info from PC gamer magazine. I don't really understand most of the people here who want an oldschool DIKU and yet are in their 30s and 40s (I intellectually understand but its not a game I would ever play), but I can't even really begin to wrap my head around someone who is a PC gamer and has a print mag as their primary information source. Hell, until this thread I thought pc gamer had died long ago along with Computer Shopper and Nintendo Power.
oh computer shopper, I remember getting a hardon reading about all those PC parts...
![]()
Nintendo Power did die.I am genuinely curious who the fuck is out there that gets their gaming info from PC gamer magazine. I don't really understand most of the people here who want an oldschool DIKU and yet are in their 30s and 40s (I intellectually understand but its not a game I would ever play), but I can't even really begin to wrap my head around someone who is a PC gamer and has a print mag as their primary information source. Hell, until this thread I thought pc gamer had died long ago along with Computer Shopper and Nintendo Power.
What a bummer that was. I rarely ever subscribed but that magazine needed to go on forever. I blame the Wii U.Nintendo Power did die.
It will be an internet article for one. Two, the magazine is very much alive, as EQN recenty got a cover story. Three, why concern yourself if you will never play it?I am genuinely curious who the fuck is out there that gets their gaming info from PC gamer magazine. I don't really understand most of the people here who want an oldschool DIKU and yet are in their 30s and 40s (I intellectually understand but its not a game I would ever play), but I can't even really begin to wrap my head around someone who is a PC gamer and has a print mag as their primary information source. Hell, until this thread I thought pc gamer had died long ago along with Computer Shopper and Nintendo Power.
oh computer shopper, I remember getting a hardon reading about all those PC parts...
![]()
I would certainly hope that there are more than 1500 people out there that want an old school MMO experience today. I too have looked at the 1500 backers number for Pantheon and scratched my head. I mean come on. 1500? There are literally millions of MMORPG gamers out there right now, and Pantheon has gotten the interest of 1,500 people. Something just doesn't add up.this is a stupid argument. of course there are more than just a few thousand people who want an MMO more in line with EQ than any modern MMO. the problem is those of us who want a game like that didn't think we'd have to pay out of pocket to have it made. if a company decided to make a MMO similar to EQ, it would have plenty of subs. not saying it would reach WoW like numbers, but hell EQ had almost a half a million players and that was before most people even knew what a MMO was. a modern day MMO modeled after EQ could easily get a million subs (if done right). i think a lot of people are still hoping for that game. and a lot of people are just hoping that pantheon can be that game. whether or not it will be is completely unknown at this point.
and i miss my '02 from FOH. '12 just doesn't have the same clout.
I'd rather play up to date EQ than play old content for a millionth time.so if this shits the bed, who want to start on p99 with me?
I'm surprised you're frustrated over PC Gamer, it isn't exactly the epitome of great gaming mags. Nobody should ever be shocked by what that douchebag mag ever does or fails to live up to.I am frustrated with PC Gamer. If what Brad says is true, they gave PC Gamer exclusive info and they are likely holding back on giving us more info until that article drops. It's a bad showing on PC Gamers part. Shame on them, this article is important for this Kickstarter.
i'm not sure how anyone can expect much more than that at this pointIt doesn't really have to much to live up too. As long as there is some actual fleshed out details about the game it will be an improvement on what we have seen so far. Reality though it's probably more along the lines of
"Well our new game is like EQ but more badass and it's like Vangaurd but not, we have a Dark Knight who does Dark Knighty things and we have Light Knight who does Light Knighty things. Of course there's grouping and it's hard and Old Skool. We have graphics and things to fight."
I mean if it's more detailed than that then it will be a win for all of us as we might get a better idea of what he is trying to really accomplish, but I think we're better off not holding our collective breath.
If we get over $700,000; in the last days you'll see many of the true vanboi types upping their pledges to make sure the thing funds. It's almost impossible that the thing barely misses funding. The real danger is that is fails to get more than $500,000ish creating too large of a gap for the vanbois to save it.here is what really sucks..... we need to get 810k... I just know that the 10k pledge is a master fucking troll waiting for the final day to bomb the total to 790k and is probably hoping for like 809.99k
It's not the article in particular. It's the fact that Brad has said they gave them exclusive info. Info that could already be released and getting more backers.I'm surprised you're frustrated over PC Gamer, it isn't exactly the epitome of great gaming mags. Nobody should ever be shocked by what that douchebag mag ever does or fails to live up to.
I can somewhat follow this argument but not really. More than 1,500 people certainly would be excited to play a game with this type of concept. They might even pay to fund a game with this type of concept, but it's a very different thing to ask people to fund a concept itself. So many people tend to skip this point, we aren't being asked to fund Pantheon, not really. What we are being asked to do with this kickstarter is to fund Visionary Realms, Inc. so they can hire staff and set up a company and then try and build Pantheon. For me personally that might sound similar but they are miles apart from being the same thing.I would certainly hope that there are more than 1500 people out there that want an old school MMO experience today. I too have looked at the 1500 backers number for Pantheon and scratched my head. I mean come on. 1500? There are literally millions of MMORPG gamers out there right now, and Pantheon has gotten the interest of 1,500 people. Something just doesn't add up.
I almost wish there was an option on Kickstarter for people to show interest with out pledging an amount for those people that like the idea, but are on the fense about spending the money just yet. At least that way, we could see how many people even want this kind of game.