I'm pretty sure they were bred from some sort of bear/dog mix.I never can believe the myths about pitbull origins because there are so many unsubstantiated ones.
I agree, any pit, or really any dog of any breed, that has been put through the brutality of dog fighting needs to be put down, no questions asked. That dog will always be dangerous no matter what kind of socialization therapy you put it through, and lets be honest, there are hundreds and thousands of other dogs being destroyed at shelters each year that could use a home, and they haven't been put through dog fighting.All i know is, fuck rescuing a pitbull once it's undergone "training", by the michal vicks of the world. once they get their hands on that dog and put it through the torture training, that dog is fucksville. (i've seen the docs, they train this dog like an olympic athlete, running constantly on treadmills, upgrading it from 10lb doggie chain, to a 20lb doggie chain and so on)
You just gotta kill them, yea it sucks to be that pitbull, it's an innocent, but it's also beyond fucked for rehabilitation.
A lot of pitbull attacks, are from pitbull rescues, they were either rescued from fights or taken away or given up, but they've gone through the training.
Now this isn't a thing against pitbulls, the michael vicks of the world, all choose the pitbull, so that's where they get fucked. the michael vicks could have all chosen bloodhounds, and bloodhounds would be the shit on breed, it's the horrific training they're put through.
His experiences? What about yours, lol. It's not like there's statistics or actuarial tables taking this into account... Oh wait, there is.Tuco, I have an English mastiff named Bruiser. Great dog, sweet, fucking chow hound, and a hair ball. No photos, he is at the farm with my dad. Had* some on my old phone.
I grew up with labs because we used them as retrievers, a few cousins had pits, and I got one in college. There is nothing inherently wrong with the breed. Don't give a fuck what Dr Gonzo says. His experiences are highly likely to be influenced by sample bias.
English mastiffs are great dogs.Tuco, I have an English mastiff named Bruiser. Great dog, sweet, fucking chow hound, and a hair ball. No photos, he is at the farm with my dad. Had* some on my old phone.
I grew up with labs because we used them as retrievers, a few cousins had pits, and I got one in college. There is nothing inherently wrong with the breed. Don't give a fuck what Dr Gonzo says. His experiences are highly likely to be influenced by sample bias.
yea, saying the breed is fucked up, is like saying all black ppl are criminals cuz of statistics, cuz in the end lets face it, a breed is no different than a race.There is nothing inherently wrong with the breed. Don't give a fuck what Dr Gonzo says. His experiences are highly likely to be influenced by sample bias.
i mean from just a denver statistic fucking chihuahuas come in right behind a pitbull, these little shits probably bite the hell out of little kids, but you won't see it in the media cuz it's not sensational enough.Based on 6,500 reported dog bites between 2012 and 2013, the top five biting breeds* in the Denver area are:
1.Labs
2.German Shepherds
3.Pit Bulls
4.Chihuahuas
5.Bulldogs
This is where you're wrong, a dog is entirely nature vs. nurture.His experiences? What about yours, lol. It's not like there's statistics or actuarial tables taking this into account... Oh wait, there is.
I couldn't care less what animals anyone owns IF they are properly kept. The fact is that many aggressive dog breeds have a habit of "accidents" and they never seem to be just the owner but rather kids, delivery guy, postman, etc.
In short if you want to play steak with an animal, be my guest. But don't take your pit bull or ocelot or rhino down to the local park then just become "baffled" when it too goes apeshit and murders someone.
There's a responsible way to own aggressive dogs and unfortunately hint, hint, it's not letting them near children, old people and the infirm and it's not putting them anywhere where you do not have positive control of the animal in all cases.
Equating a race that evolved to endure the sun to a breed of dogs that was specifically bred for certain characteristics (specifically being tough and having a good bite) is pretty bad.yea, saying the breed is fucked up, is like saying all black ppl are criminals cuz of statistics, cuz in the end lets face it, a breed is no different than a race.
Thats what i say to ppl who prefer a certain dog breed (or hate on another), you're being a dog racist, why not just love all dogs.
Since the cultures are so different across the world, it's not a stretch to say that humans could have been selected for different characteristics (personality included) in different cultures. Our "races" are just people who have certain selected characteristics in common. There's no reason to believe that those characteristics begin and end at skin color (we know they don't).Equating a race that evolved to endure the sun to a breed of dogs that was specifically bred for certain characteristics (specifically being tough and having a good bite) is pretty bad.
But I'll ignore all that. Lanx, do you agree that pitbulls are one of the most common dog involved in dog fatalities?
Has anyone here claimed that pit bulls aren't more dangerous than most other dogs?Lanx, do you agree that pitbulls are one of the most common dog involved in dog fatalities?
of course, i'm not defending them, they just happen to be the unlucky breed that michal vicks of the world choose to breed as dog fighters and make them unstoppable killing machines. does that mean they will pass on those unstoppable killing machine genes? not necessaryily maybe they'll make a stronger killer dog.Equating a race that evolved to endure the sun to a breed of dogs that was specifically bred for certain characteristics (specifically being tough and having a good bite) is pretty bad.
But I'll ignore all that. Lanx, do you agree that pitbulls are one of the most common dog involved in dog fatalities?
Do you have any evidence to support this?But the problem is that usually pitbull attacks/fatalities are from rescues,
other than saying the articles i've see "Pitbull attacks..." if, they give you any background you see rescue, or another common fatal attack is "rescuer slain", and they happen to be a pitbull rescuer.Do you have any evidence to support this?
I think part of the problem is that pits are almost all mutts and thus dirt cheap to buy puppies, whereas getting a pure bred german shepherd or rot puppy you will spend anywhere from a couple hundred to well over a thousand dollars. I've only once in my life seen a pure bred Amstaff, he was gorgeous and very friendly/well raised.Bull mastiff s are old English bulldog mixed with English mastiff iirc. And English mastiff s were originally bred for war, or descended from a breed that was. And here you have an example of what I said earlier, I am not an expert by any means, but far above average as far as knowledge and experience training dogs, as I would assume anyone would be that is willing to have an animal that had the potential to be 200+lbs and maim you while playing. And that is reflected in the breed and experiences people have with it. Same for pits, but the exact opposite direction.
Let me know if you find any hard data on this. It would be interesting to see just how wide the split is of bite incidents among pits rescued from fighting vs dogs raised in a non-fighting home from birth.other than saying the articles i've see "Pitbull attacks..." if, they give you any background you see rescue, or another common fatal attack is "rescuer slain", and they happen to be a pitbull rescuer.
but also b/c it's more sensational to say "Pitbull attacks..." even a puppy raised from birth, probably attacked someone, but then that goes into the whole nature vs. nurture and whether or not they raised the dog properly and it just happen to be a pitbull.