^ This and This and THISYou call it a "man path". There is no brainwashing here. I want to continue living as well, or better than I do now for the rest of my life. I want to own boats, take fun, exotic vacations, own nice cars and live in a nice house. I want to be able to keep my membership at my private country club, spend ridiculous amounts of money at good restaurants and on fine wine and craft beers. I want to be able to do all those things and not have to sacrifice my lifestyle simply because I met a woman. I'm perfectly capable of paying my cleaning lady to scrub my floors and toilets. I'm perfectly capable of doing the dishes and my own laundry. I'm a pretty decent cook. I don't need a woman to take care of domestic necessities for me.
Traditional gender roles are antiquated. Technology has made housewives all but obsolete. I could see needing someone to hold the fort down back in the days of hand washing clothes and butchering your own meat. Nowadays? Not so much.
Huh, crazy, I'm in the 98th percentile. I thought I was a lot lower, but I was comparing myself to all households, not just singles. I said it in the other thread, but it really doesn't matter how much you make, as long as you make more than her. (And you strategically flaunt it). If you're making 100k and driving a 7 year old Honda, unless it's an s2000, you're not taking advantage of your assets.Again, apparently it makes no difference. So either there was insufficient data above 100k (possible) or it literally doesn't make a difference.
EDIT: Also 109k is top 3% of income. That is amazing if you actually think about it.
I absolutely want kids. That has nothing to do with what I'm saying. You don't need a stay at home parent to raise children.What I got from that is you basically don't want kids. Right?
Still puts you in the top 2%, actually. Both nationally and for your region. The difference between South Carolina and New York only averages 13k. Though if you think 150k isn't impressive, I can see why you think girls won't either. This is a reality vs perception issue. The reality is anyone making that much money is unusual (in statistics anything that happens less than 5% of the time is usually considered unusual). The perception is you probably hang out with a fair number of people who make that much money and still complain about not having enough money. Ditto date girls who etc.That 103k being top 3% doesn't mean much because it's over the entirety of the US. I live in the northeast in between both NYC and Boston. I make just over $150k/yr. That's probably only top 10% in my region though. A far cry from if I made that money living in say South Carolina.
Taking "advantage of your assets"? lolHuh, crazy, I'm in the 98th percentile. I thought I was a lot lower, but I was comparing myself to all households, not just singles. I said it in the other thread, but it really doesn't matter how much you make, as long as you make more than her. (And you strategically flaunt it). If you're making 100k and driving a 7 year old Honda, unless it's an s2000, you're not taking advantage of your assets.
I did state to state comparisons. So New York vs South Carolina. Census website has all the data if you want to dig into it. Though NYC is poor too. Median household income in NYC is still only 52k. You're not alone though, Slate did an article about the misconception of NYC being a rich city. Reality is most people are pretty poor.I find it hard to believe that I would be considered top 2% in Manhattan, Boston, Fairfield County CT, Essex County CT, Westchester, Long Island, etc etc etc. Do you have those statistics handy? I should have been more specific about what I considered a region. I mean as small as a local county, not the entirety of New England, or the Northeastern Seaboard. And I should have mentioned I meant salaries specifically in NYC (not the entirety of NY, which is mostly poor outside of NYC and Long Island) vs South Carolina, which probably isn't a fair assessment, I just don't know of specific areas in South Carolina.
That is fine and perfectly understandable. I just think it is important to step back and realize where you are financially. For one it should give you a huge amount of confidence now that you realize and for another women who think you don't make enough, you can point out how insanely out of touch they are with reality.Well thinking about it more and reading all that I see that I was way off base considering most of NYC are restaurant workers, cab drivers, public servants and starving artists. But the point remains I know I have a good life and I don't want to sacrifice my lifestyle to such an extent that I am sole provider for an entire family. Not only would I have to give up a lot but I'd also sacrifice a lot of professional freedom. Freedom to move to a new job without worrying about what might happen to my family if it didn't work out or taking a big pay cut to work at a promising start up with equity shares or start my own business, etc. It's a lot of pressure.
I didn't say you lacked confidence, but confidence doesn't have a ceiling either. Also it isn't a one-off thing, you can be more or less confident in certain areas. Being hit with the reality of where you are financially, when you thought you were much lower down the economic totem pole, can only be a confidence boost in that area. All I meant.I have no lack of confidence, nor have I ever had an issue meeting women both through dating websites or out in person. I've also never had a woman say "you don't make enough", I just thought it was interesting the one time I actually put my income on the dating sites it was a huge beacon in the night for women who I just was not interested in and seemed to turn off women I was interested in. Of course that could have just been timing too since I only did it for about 2 weeks. Hardly a good sample size.