- 46,614
- 214,546
This is probably the most intelligent content in this thread thus far.
Red Pill Thread 2.0: Neckbeard Revenge
- Thread starter Himeo
- Start date
-
Guest, it's time once again for the massively important and exciting FoH Asshat Tournament!
Go here and give us your nominations!Who's been the biggest Asshat in the last year? Give us your worst ones!
- 771
- 936
Are there no other German Americans on this board. The old places are empty and there are no new recruits. Where exactly do you expect me to start ringing the bell?
General Antony
Ahn'Qiraj Raider
- 1,147
- 4,802
What a horrible fucking post.
The exhibit you posted is not the model, Exhibit 1 shows the full model - this is a single variable analysis of how well one continuous variable predicts a single binary variable. The purpose of this exhibit is to show the relative difference between the regression factors and the standard errors associated with them. When the absolute value of the factor is greater than twice the standard error that is a general indication that the variable is non-zero with statistical significance. In short, get the fuck out of here moron.
It's like the white knight brigade was never taught literacy in their ultimate quest to defend their feminine overlords:
I wasn't talking about all English-speaking men. I was talking about stories from men in LTRs throughout the blogosphere having relationship issues because they let their significant other effectively cuckold them, and the usual bullshit solutions like 'communicate more' always shows up. That story is just another example atop the pile.Dumar_sl said:
But you're right: RP helpsallmen more effectively deal withallwomen.
Cad
scientia potentia est
- 25,426
- 49,042
Even worse, they (particularly Dumar, but he's easily the dumbest of the group) take our anecdotes and go "BUT IVE GOT DATA, YOUR ANECDOTES ARE WORTHLESS!" and then post anecdotes about guys getting cheated on.
Cad
scientia potentia est
- 25,426
- 49,042
We want you to get it. The problem isn't with your "proof" since you're proving things everyone already knows. The problem is with the conclusions you draw from that proof.
And as I said,outliers possibly exist. There could be a special unicornsomewhereon the planet that goes against my conclusions. When I say all women, I'm literally talking about almost every single woman you'll encounter in everyday life. All is correct: because we do not know if this unicorn does in fact exist somewhere. a_skeleton_03 married a virgin, for example, but her hypergamy might be satiated with him (e.g., she's a 6, but he's an 8 in the sexual market she's encountered), or it could kick in when she sees some alpha cad in a random bar in a GNO one night if she has the goods to attract.We don't know about any unicorns, only that they could exist.
The most recent anecdotal story shows women do not care about relational equity (and we've seen this over and over ... and over): years, decades in a relationship makes little difference in the decision-making process. That's whyallwomen are the same in regards to how they choose their sexual partners. Do some women hop off the carousel, restrain themselves and resent both themselves and their eventual beta partner for it? Yes. Do some societies ostracize or shame this behavior (ours does not any longer)? Yes. But deep down in their firmware,they all choose the same way. Or i.e.,all women fulfill their hypergamous impulses with some men.
There aren't 'different types of women' who are each special snowflakes.
The most recent anecdotal story shows women do not care about relational equity (and we've seen this over and over ... and over): years, decades in a relationship makes little difference in the decision-making process. That's whyallwomen are the same in regards to how they choose their sexual partners. Do some women hop off the carousel, restrain themselves and resent both themselves and their eventual beta partner for it? Yes. Do some societies ostracize or shame this behavior (ours does not any longer)? Yes. But deep down in their firmware,they all choose the same way. Or i.e.,all women fulfill their hypergamous impulses with some men.
There aren't 'different types of women' who are each special snowflakes.
With regards to carnal sexual desire and how that desire impacts their choices and behaviors in interpersonal relationships, yes, you're getting it.
Now with that understanding, we can put it to use.
ZyyzYzzy
RIP USA
- 25,295
- 48,789
Sorry, there is variation in sexual desires between people Dumar.
Seriously, you should end your life. Give everyone something to celebrate.
Cad
scientia potentia est
- 25,426
- 49,042
There are different types of women, because their priorities are different. Yes, they might be attracted to someone else, but that doesn't mean they aren't also attracted to you, and value the relationship. I could nail any number of smoking hot SMU girls that live near me and walk near my house constantly and are in all the stores and shops near my house... but guess what? I do not care. They are hot, so what? I could get them, so what? I can see in my own thinking that your conclusions are wrong. If your conclusions were right, there are any number of guys on MY STREET that are richer than me. There's a $10M house about 5 houses down. If your conclusions were right, that guy would be with some 22 year old trophy wife because his net worth is probably $100M. But he's with the woman he married in his 20's (they're in their 50's).
Your conclusions are right sometimes. But they're not right for the reasons you think they are. Correlation is not causation.
Jive Turkey
Karen
- 6,722
- 9,087
Except when it comes to the red pill though, right? Because then human behaviour becomes super easy to predict.... right?
I like how the main validation for it is managing to nail dumb 22 year old girls, too. "SEE, THIS IS AMAZING! THIS SHIT WORKS!"
Jive Turkey
Karen
- 6,722
- 9,087
This is what this thread is all about for antarius. It's a place for him to overcompensate for his low self esteem.
My god, these mundane anecdotes though.