Red Pill Thread 2.0: Neckbeard Revenge

  • Guest, it's time once again for the massively important and exciting FoH Asshat Tournament!



    Go here and give us your nominations!
    Who's been the biggest Asshat in the last year? Give us your worst ones!

Kirun

Buzzfeed Editor
19,236
15,625
Im a roman legionary class. I can march for three days straight on nothing but water. You think I dont I recognize my own brother?

Red rover, red rover, come in. Please...
Whomever this alt account belongs to, brav fucking o. Every post makes me laugh a little bit harder than the last.
 

Antarius

Lord Nagafen Raider
1,828
15
Himeo: "It was totally him wanting to go play golf that changed everything!"

Rest of thread: "No, it was him working on turning himself into someone worth being in a relationship."

Himeo: "LOL READ THE ARTICLE"

Rest of thread: "I hope that red pill is full of cyanide."
Himeo was being sarcastic.

Himeo is saying that the one thing was that he declined his wife. He did what HE wanted to do... and it saved their relationship.
The rest of the thread was saying, yea but he totally could have given in to his wife's demands AND STILL got what he wanted...


But the truth is no... he didn't want to go to the baby shower, and so he didn't, and his wife likes him more because of it.
 

Gryphe

Golden Knight of the Realm
63
9
Oh, neato! Then maybe I can hook up with a post wall rad fem with three kids from three different dad's! What a lucky guy I'll be.

You just turned it around for me, Duppbro!
Are all post-wall women like that? Or just some?
 

Himeo

Vyemm Raider
3,263
2,802
Are all post-wall women like that? Or just some?
Do all post wall women want to get married?

tongue.png


Are all post wall women amputees?

No.
 

Himeo

Vyemm Raider
3,263
2,802
Are all post-wall women like that? Or just some?
Couple questions for you about the math behind rsquared and all that shit.

You're saying that the measurable effect of the sample was small? Like, not significant?

But it was there, right. Tiny, annoying, like that piece of popcorn stuck in your mouth. It's there, the effect is small.

Have you considered it being a small effect is a good thing? If it was more significant, let's say, would there be some big fucking problems in society?

Another thing, the effect is supposed to be a preference. IE, a woman might prefer a rich dude but settle for something else.

So you're saying your statistics prove gold diggers are a myth?

 

Antarius

Lord Nagafen Raider
1,828
15
Red pill is really good about using accurate terms for the process. They are called plates, because it takes effort to keep them spinning, sometimes one crashes to the floor and you need to set up another one on the stick. Dating 5 women at once is not easy, it's spinning plates, it's not an analogy, it's a simile.
 

Antarius

Lord Nagafen Raider
1,828
15
Couple questions for you about the math behind rsquared and all that shit.

You're saying that the measurable effect of the sample was small? Like, not significant?

But it was there, right. Tiny, annoying, like that piece of popcorn stuck in your mouth. It's there, the effect is small.

Have you considered it being a small effect is a good thing? If it was more significant, let's say, would there be some big fucking problems in society?

Another thing, the effect is supposed to be a preference. IE, a woman might prefer a rich dude but settle for something else.

So you're saying your statistics prove gold diggers are a myth?
No, it's not like that at all... that means they can make a chart... put a line on it and 8% of the time the data points are going to exactly be on the line.

regression - Is $R^2$ useful or dangerous? - Cross Validated

the number one comment with 128 upvotes right now is a good explanation.

Anything above .05 in sociology is considered "plausable" for the hypothosis, lower than that and it's considered "random noise"

Woman makes less than man, 12% divorce rate. Woman makes more than man, 18% divorce rate. Is it DIRECTLY caused by that, or by some other outside factor. With a .08 R-squared factor, which is again, pretty large when predicting human behavior (we're unpredictable mutherfuckers), they're able to safely say, yes, it is much more likely for a woman to be unhappy, for the man to be unhappy, and it will cause more divorces... but it is not the only cause for divorce and not all people in that scenario will have a divorce.

But think about this. If you think about all of the things that might affect someone's health, do you really expect religious attendance to be a major contributor?

Even though I'm not a health researcher, I can think of quite a few variables that I would expect to be much better predictors of health. Things like age, disease history, stress levels, family history of disease, job conditions.

And putting all of them into the model would indeed give better predicted values. If the only point of the model was prediction, my client's model would do a pretty bad job. (Perhaps the 70% comment came from someone who only runs prediction models).

But it wasn't. The point was to see if there was a small, but reliable relationship. And there was.

Do small effect sizes require larger samples to find significance? Sure. But this data set had over 5000 people. Not a problem.

Many researchers turned to using effect sizes because evaluating effects using p-values alone can be misleading. But effect sizes can be misleading too if you don't think about what they mean within the research context.
 

Himeo

Vyemm Raider
3,263
2,802
To be honest, I don't really give a shit. I just wanted to post that Kanye Video.

Thanks though.
 

gremlinz273

<Bronze Donator>
771
936
Because if I see one of you pussy fucks being aggressivelly rude and practicing this Red Pill shit on our women, I'm going to show you exactly what 1000 years of Red Pill breeding looks like.

Tell me again, pussy boys, tell me how the boogy man doesn't exist.
 

gremlinz273

<Bronze Donator>
771
936
And it has been tuned to Obama. And hes been forcing me to drop everything. So I can attempt to get you bitches back on track.

can I sleep now sambo?
 

gremlinz273

<Bronze Donator>
771
936
And if They managed to get a fucking radio in my head. The next thing They'll do is cram this whole fucking Eye Phone down there and then "I'm hooked up to machine, it performs my daily functions through a tube. And They are going to just profit on the flow of food to shit. And if this is happening to you. Dont worry, We Can Help.

The Masons.
 

ZyyzYzzy

RIP USA
<Banned>
25,295
48,789
Of course I agree that an R-squared of 0.1 is horrible. But you're going a bit overboard if you're expecting an R-squared of 0.98 for something that doesn't directly model a well-known physical process. What are you modelling that gets such high R-squared values? The diffusion of water? Radioactive decay?

All of this (and previous posts) to say:

Dumar and his rag-tag group of angry loners are too dumb to realize that the very papers they're citing do not support the idea that ALL women behave in the manner they're describing. I wonder if perhaps they're in too deep to admit that not all women are the same.
Designing detection assays.

And antarius a 0.05 or 0.08 R^2 value means you have random data with no correlation.