Red Pill Thread 2.0: Neckbeard Revenge
- Thread starter Himeo
- Start date
-
Guest, it's time once again for the massively important and exciting FoH Asshat Tournament!
Go here and give us your nominations!Who's been the biggest Asshat in the last year? Give us your worst ones!
Gender equalism is false.
How many euphemisms shall we use to describe dominance, gentlemen? Playfully assertive? Humbly cunning? Lovingly bold? Respectfully aggressive? What? All are nonsensical.
As long as someone connects with a female while acting somewhere between "playfully assertive" and "fist raping" you are totally proven right.
Khane
Got something right about marriage
- 20,337
- 14,000
If you don't understand what being playfully assertive means I'll use a word you might understand. Flirtatious. How's that? Just doesn't sound as manly but it's the same thing. No wonder you need red pill. Can't even understand basic shit.
khalid
Unelected Mod
- 14,071
- 6,775
Well, how about you respond to Khane's question. Do you understand what playfully assertive means? You, who was so interested in playing word games before and talking at length about how we have to use words with exact meaning, then suddenly group up a fuckload of sayings under "dominance" so you can wave your hand and pretend that anything proves your theory.
Of course. Roosh has entries upon entries devoted to it. It's a component of being socially dominant.
In RP/PUA, 'playfully or assertively flirtatious' is called playing a clown. To learn more:
Men Are Nothing More Than Clowns To The Modern Woman
How To Be A Good Clown
In RP/PUA, 'playfully or assertively flirtatious' is called playing a clown. To learn more:
Men Are Nothing More Than Clowns To The Modern Woman
How To Be A Good Clown
Kirun
Buzzfeed Editor
- 19,236
- 15,625
Yeah, that's always been my biggest problem with most RedPill bloggers. Tomassi is terrible with that "conspiracy" bullshit as well, but he's toned it down a lot as of late. I read a lot of it going, "Yeah..uh huh..ok..yeah, I know that..uh huh...wait, what?".
You misunderstand. I realize when he uses 'feminine imperative' it's misleading, but it's not a conspiracy in the sense that it's some overarching villainous plot. It's subconscious, a fulfilling of biological drives to the fullest extent possible - i.e., open and even celebrated hypergamy and the alpha fux, beta pux paradigm. You can see evidence of this everywhere in society; at it's very most extreme, the recent cuckoldry sexual fetish that some men are into.
The Intellectual Sex Fetish
The development of this fetish is not a coincidence; it's a direct result of what Tomassi talks about.
The Intellectual Sex Fetish
The development of this fetish is not a coincidence; it's a direct result of what Tomassi talks about.
Kirun
Buzzfeed Editor
- 19,236
- 15,625
Right, but that isn't how it comes off in his writing at all. It very much comes off as a nefarious plot, perpetrated by women. A sinister plan that is extremely pervasive. It really isn't as complicated as that, at all. Nor is it nearly as ominous as most bloggers make it sound.
I would disagree that it isn't pervasive. It is. The fulfillment of women's hypergamous sexual strategy becomes acceptable as anew normal, a new norm in society. Men become acceptable to it and even complacent in it. That link is an example.
Jive Turkey
Karen
- 6,720
- 9,081
Caeden
Golden Baronet of the Realm
- 7,579
- 12,532
Only a weak man (not strength literally) is complicit in that cuckold shit. I guess technically it happened to me, but she was divorced so fast her head spun. I did a few more things to put her in her place and she's remarried and pregnant with her admittedly inferior man.
I've been waiting for an explanation of why my ex continually cheated with intellectually, physically, and financially inferior men. She gave me the answer finally despite me knowing it: she has to have dominance. She could never handle that ignore or called her out on her bs.
I've been waiting for an explanation of why my ex continually cheated with intellectually, physically, and financially inferior men. She gave me the answer finally despite me knowing it: she has to have dominance. She could never handle that ignore or called her out on her bs.
I think we could make the case that it was these genes that selected for domination above all else that survived, and that's the explanationwhymodern women are fickle, seek the most socially dominant men like a homing missile, and generally feel no empathy towards what they perceive as social weakness.
The women thatactually loved their husbands in a related, empathic sensewere likely selected out - i.e., they could've been conquered and instead of submitting to their new mates, they chose death. So looking at it from an evolutionary, biological propagation-type lens, the behavior of the modern woman makes complete sense.
Think about it. Your primitive village is conquered and all the men dead - polygamy or whatever type of social structure it was doesn't matter. The men and children are dead or slaves. The women never saw them again. As a woman, you could either sexually submit to your new masters or die. The women that actually refused didn't breed. The ones that did survived. A woman that actually feltattachmentwas selected out in history.
Essentially, the modern woman is an efficient, hypergamistic biological breeding machine who hones in on and seeks to mate with a prehistoric, barbaric perception of the best genetics seen in physical fitness and psycho-social dominance, and then subconsciously reverses this script to secure the best provisioning she can for her and her offspring because, due to modern society and how wealth is accrued in its social structures, the best provisioning is not seen in the same mate. Nature, it's one badass motherfucker.
That's it; that's the whole story in a tiny paragraph. The rest? Fluff added on top.