EVERY SINGLE WOMAN, that has a profile on okcupid, pof, or match or eharmony or whatever that has kids is going to cuckold you with ZERO shame.The final sentence is what really indicates to me how cynical you think. What hypothetical partner of mine is going to cuckold me with no shame? Zero. Now, the nasty sluts you and Dumar bang day/in day/out via internet dating might include some fucked up sociopathic women... but holy fuck, y'all are finding each other for a reason.
Proactive cheating is the single Mommy dilema. This form of ?cheating? relies on the woman breeding with a Good Genes male, bearing his children and then abandoning him, or having him abandon her, (again through invented social conventions) in order to find a Good Dad male to provide for her and the children of her Good Genes partner to ensure their security.
I want to stress again that (most) women do not have some consciously constructed and recognized master plan to enact this cycle and deliberately trap men into it. Rather, the motivations for this behavior and the accompanying social rationales invented to justify it are an unconscious process. For the most part, women are unaware of this dynamic, but are nonetheless subject to it?s influence. For a female of any species to facilitate a methodology for breeding with the best genetic partner she?s able to attract AND to ensure her own and her offspring?s survival with the best provisioning partner; this is an evolutionary jackpot.
Population is the entire group you're looking at. So all people with below X income is your population. Then you take a sample of that, and derive statistically valid conclusions from your sample that should apply to the entire population of people below X income. I'm not using population to mean the entirety of humanity, but in the way it is used in statistics.I think you mean sample, not population.
Which is fine, until you compare them. Then they are samples of a larger population.Population is the entire group you're looking at. So all people with below X income is your population. Then you take a sample of that, and derive statistically valid conclusions from your sample that should apply to the entire population of people below X income. I'm not using population to mean the entirety of humanity, but in the way it is used in statistics.
So the studies are looking at a particular population, they take a sample from that population. Etc.
No, man. That's not how that word works. Cuckold implies deception: dictionary "a man whose wife is unfaithful" -- if you voluntarily enter into a relationship with a single mother, you haven't been cuckolded.EVERY SINGLE WOMAN, that has a profile on okcupid, pof, or match or eharmony or whatever that has kids is going to cuckold you with ZERO shame.
wat.Shitting out the kid of some penniless jerkboy & getting some middle-class chump to raise it in a nurturing home TRULY is nature on display.
It is usually bad to paint an entire movement with a few advocates, but its pretty hard to not do that here.My disgust with TRPers in general is that they'd like to present this "we the wronged" front and talk mad shit about an entire gender, but whenever I dial in on specific examples, they're just pissed off men who have fucking issues and date women with fucking issues.
Yep, the agenda to survive & propagate hers and the 'best' genes forward she can secure.through some unconscious agenda of the entire female gender... rofl.
That's probably where it started. But genuine self-improvement is hard and it's much easier to rabble about hypergamy and cuckolding.Also, lets please dispense with the silly illusion that its about "self-improvement". If that was the case, not every TRP defender would almost immediately start screaming about hypergamy and paternity tests.
What a persuasive set of ambassadors -- what you're telling me is... if I want to be like Antarius/Trollface/Dumar, all I have to do is delve deep into TRP? I'm sold.You have antarius, a serial dater on OKC, who admits that in his one long-term relationship he only "mostly" didn't cheat. Then we have Trollface, a 30 year old virgin who has said he has trouble talking to women. Then Dumar, a person so negative that he routinely talks about how if you know the "truth" of the world you should kill yourself. Is it any fucking shock that these three have only found women confirming their stereotypes?
Yeah, take it from Khalid. He's a master womanizer and knows a thing or two about neckbearded nerds. How's your strategy of rejecting RP going? Still single? Oh, it's by "choice", right?You have antarius, a serial dater on OKC, who admits that in his one long-term relationship he only "mostly" didn't cheat. Then we have Trollface, a 30 year old virgin who has said he has trouble talking to women. Then Dumar, a person so negative that he routinely talks about how if you know the "truth" of the world you should kill yourself. Is it any fucking shock that these three have only found women confirming their stereotypes?
Oh, you are a fan of RP also? How not shocking coming from the most notorious misogynist of the forum. Yeah, its just about "self-improvement", right.Yeah, take it from Khalid. He's a master womanizer and knows a thing or two about neckbearded nerds. How's your strategy of rejecting RP going? Still single? Oh, it's by "choice", right?
Dude he was copy-pasting red pill stuff for months.Oh, you are a fan of RP also? How not shocking coming from the most notorious misogynist of the forum. Yeah, its just about "self-improvement", right.
Is there really this debate over whether or not women expect to marry someone who makes more than they do?That's probably where it started. But genuine self-improvement is hard and it's much easier to rabble about hypergamy and cuckolding.
It could be.Is there really this debate over whether or not women expect to marry someone who makes more than they do?
What about the health benefits? Lifting builds muscle (leaving you with more when you age) as well as bone mass. I also enjoy knowing if something bad happened, I could fireman carry most people out of a bad situation. I don't lift to get laid -- I'm married, lifting is irrelevant to my sex life. However, my wife would probably say my interest in self-improvement is attractive, regardless of which avenue I'm pursuing.Exercise is great, and it certainly benefits you to stay fit. However, lifting, for example, is done almost exclusively (unless it's your income) to gain the attraction of women, not actual self-improvement in the self-actualized sense.
No. Maybe you feel that, but stating that every man feels that is ridiculous. I don't do any of this shit to impress women -- I do things that are fun or that I know are important for the future. Some of those things women find impressive/attractive. Do you really think that every man on this planet needs constant validation from women? No fucking wonder we disagree. You live a miserable existence.Dumar, if you were a fun person to be around, you wouldn't need any of that crap to have friends or a happy wife.So you can see, we're simply biological machines who's conscious imperative is for recognition of higher status by the opposite sex. That's all we are. That's all chimps are. We buy the porsche, power-lift, travel the world and post pics on facebook, all for the attraction of women, not toactuallyself-improve ourselves independent of anyone else's, any woman's, opinion.
This is a good point, and I agree with this. However, it's important to consider what PEOPLE think of you -- we're social creatures. Deciding to unilaterally disregard what everyone around you thinks is foolhearty. But letting other people define you or being reliant on them for your own happiness is equally bad.If you want real, true self-improvement,thatis much, much harder: because it begins with not only TRP, but then discarding the weight of what others think of you, what women think of you. I think it's that path (which I'm not on yet, tbh), that road is the one to a true living, self-actualized enlightenment.
MGTOWLet's be clear. It's not precisely self-improvement: it'simprovement in attraction of women, and there's a difference, a distinct dichotomy.
Real self-improvement would be going and getting a degree in physics or philosophy simply because you truly are self-actualizedregardless of women, want to expand your perspective, push your horizons. Unless this correlates to some type of wealth or status, it's not improvement in their attraction to you. For improvement in the attraction of women, you would pursue an MBA and become a six-figure bean counter in the capitalist machine, which would directly translate to higher wealth, higher status in society. But in terms ofactually doingsomething, you're not doing much.
Exercise is great, and it certainly benefits you to stay fit. However, lifting, for example, is done almost exclusively (unless it's your income) to gain the attraction of women, not actual self-improvement in the self-actualized sense.
So you can see, we're simply biological machines who's conscious imperative is for recognition of higher status by the opposite sex. That's all we are. That's all chimps are. We buy the porsche, power-lift, travel the world and post pics on facebook, all for the attraction of women, not toactuallyself-improve ourselves independent of anyone else's, any woman's, opinion.
If you want real, true self-improvement,thatis much, much harder: because it begins with not only TRP, but then discarding the weight of what others think of you, what women think of you. I think it's that path (which I'm not on yet, tbh), that road is the one to a true living, self-actualized enlightenment.
I didn't recognize that acronym so I had to look it up. FromMGTOW | Men Going Their Own WayMGTOW