Red Pill Thread 2.0: Neckbeard Revenge

  • Guest, it's time once again for the massively important and exciting FoH Asshat Tournament!



    Go here and give us your nominations!
    Who's been the biggest Asshat in the last year? Give us your worst ones!

Jive Turkey

Karen
6,728
9,119
I don't worship anything: I explain phenomena in concrete terms using observable reality as my measuring stick. And from that, make predictions and prescriptions. RP doesn't use religious-inspired terminology to explain how things work, unlike you and others.

Just follow your heart am I rite!
Measurable terms or fictitious scenarios that seem to make sense in your head?

I'd love to see you cite some sources for your ridiculous cuckolding/divorce claims
 

Dumar_sl

shitlord
3,712
4
What do you think equality means? It's not describing both genders as the same, which is what you're doing.
 

a_skeleton_03

<Banned>
29,948
29,763
What do you think equality means?
Let's start with step one. Giving that person the benefit of the doubt that their entire existence is not there to cuckold you or screw you over in some way.

Step two, treat them like you would any bro currently buying into the redpillBS.
 

Mario Speedwagon

Gold Recognition
<Prior Amod>
19,525
72,215
Dumar, what does RP tell you to do when you meet a woman who thinks that hardcore death mechanics have no place in an MMO and that Marx is a faggot?
 

Dumar_sl

shitlord
3,712
4
Let's start with step one. Giving that person the benefit of the doubt that their entire existence is not there to cuckold you or screw you over in some way.

Step two, treat them like you would any bro currently buying into the redpillBS.
Give biology the benefit of the doubt? How do you think humans and their ancestors have survived and propagated for thousands of years, by being rational creatures and agreeing on rational relationship terms? That same evolutionary agency, that same impetus is what drives attraction, drives the primal sexual choices forming and maintaining relationships today.

Benefit of the doubt? No thanks, I'll look at reality instead.
 

Jive Turkey

Karen
6,728
9,119
Give biology the benefit of the doubt? How do you think humans and their ancestors have survived and propagated for thousands of years, by being rational creatures and agreeing on rational relationship terms? That same evolutionary agency, that same impetus is what drives attraction, drives the primal sexual choices forming and maintaining relationships today.
sources please.
What do you know about the evolution of human intersexual relationships and pair bonding? You've read a ton about it, I'm sure. Care to list some actual evidence?

You've got about as much riding on actual evolution and evidence as the fucking paleo diet does
 

Eidal

Molten Core Raider
2,001
213
sources please.
What do you know about the evolution of human intersexual relationships and pair bonding? You've read a ton about it, I'm sure. Care to list some actual evidence?
Stand by for unsubstantiated links to RP bloggers.
 

a_skeleton_03

<Banned>
29,948
29,763
Give biology the benefit of the doubt? How do you think humans and their ancestors have survived and propagated for thousands of years, by being rational creatures and agreeing on rational relationship terms? That same evolutionary agency, that same impetus is what drives attraction, drives the primal sexual choices forming and maintaining relationships today.

Benefit of the doubt? No thanks, I'll look at reality instead.
So your "reality" is that women are unequal and inferior just admit it instead of doing this "show me treating them unequal" bullshit you keep doing.

I would almost welcome your redpillfantasies if you killed off your socialist ideas at the same time.
 

Abefroman

Naxxramas 1.0 Raider
12,594
11,938
Dumar, what does RP tell you to do when you meet a woman who thinks that hardcore death mechanics have no place in an MMO and that Marx is a faggot?
Probably this.
image-6-the-remake-that-no-one-asked-for-american-psycho.jpeg
 

Dumar_sl

shitlord
3,712
4
The source is literally every species on the planet. If you're somehow trying to argue that our ancestors used egalitarian equalism to form sexual relationships I'm gonna ask for your account nuked and your parents to send you to retard camp permanently, not just for the summer as usual.

So your "reality" is that women are unequal and inferior just admit it instead of doing this "show me treating them unequal" bullshit you keep doing.
Again, read more carefully: unequal as innot the same, not a judgement of value or superiority. You're conflating the two, just as feminism and most of society does.
 

Jive Turkey

Karen
6,728
9,119
The source is literally every species on the planet.
you need to try harder than this. Sources please.

Do you think Silverback Gorillas and humans have anything in common as far as mating and relationships go? Because if you do you're even more retarded than I already thought.

And "every species on the planet" couldn't be more wrong and easily refutable
 

Dumar_sl

shitlord
3,712
4
How do animals choose mates? Here's a hint if you're not sure: they don't base their decisions to enter into sexual relationships on reasoned, conscious thought. No animal on Earth does this, including, guess who, human beings. The source is literally every scholarly article about human and animal mating practices, and how those animals choose: nothing chooses based on a reasoned or rational, conscious decision. They choose based on limbic instinct, and this is an evolutionary agency, one which is what you religious people and society calls 'love'.

This instinct is what RP breaks down, describes, and predicts behavior based upon it. Again, it's not basing analyses on idealistic notions of 'love', 'follow your heart', etc, and if you use that language, as I said, your conception of, your description of reality takes a religious tone, whereas mine is grounded in rationalism.
 

Jive Turkey

Karen
6,728
9,119
How do animals choose mates? Here's a hint if you're not sure: they don't base their decisions to enter into sexual relationships on reasoned, conscious thought. No animal on Earth does this, including, guess who, human beings. The source is literally every scholarly article about human and animal mating practices, and how those animals choose: nothing chooses based on a reasoned or rational, conscious decision. They choose based on limbic instinct, and this is a evolutionary agency, one which is what you religious people and society calls 'love'.

This instinct is what RP breaks down, describes, and predicts behavior based upon it.
Please go ahead and apply this bro science to your cuckold theory. Surely you've got some sources on something as specific as that...

And seeing as how there are thousands of evolved behaviours for selecting and maintaining (or not) a mate, your blanket statement says nothing in particular about your theories on human behaviour.
"Every species chooses a mate based on instinct". Fine. What are you criteria for how female homo sapiens choose a mate and where did you get that from?

edit: said bro science, meant neckbeard science


And did you really just call me religious? Amazing
 

ZyyzYzzy

RIP USA
<Banned>
25,295
48,789
How do animals choose mates? Here's a hint if you're not sure: they don't base their decisions to enter into sexual relationships on reasoned, conscious thought. No animal on Earth does this, including, guess who, human beings. The source is literally every scholarly article about human and animal mating practices, and how those animals choose: nothing chooses based on a reasoned or rational, conscious decision. They choose based on limbic instinct, and this is an evolutionary agency, one which is what you religious people and society calls 'love'.

This instinct is what RP breaks down, describes, and predicts behavior based upon it. Again, it's not basing analyses on idealistic notions of 'love', 'follow your heart', etc, and if you use that language, as I said, your conception of, your description of reality takes a religious tone, whereas mine is grounded in rationalism.
This is why you should stick to your social "sciences". You are a fucking idiot.
 

Mist

REEEEeyore
<Gold Donor>
31,378
23,799
How do animals choose mates? Here's a hint if you're not sure: they don't base their decisions to enter into sexual relationships on reasoned, conscious thought. No animal on Earth does this, including, guess who, human beings. The source is literally every scholarly article about human and animal mating practices, and how those animals choose: nothing chooses based on a reasoned or rational, conscious decision. They choose based on limbic instinct, and this is an evolutionary agency, one which is what you religious people and society calls 'love'.
No other animal drives cars.
No other animal plays video games.
No other animal bakes pies.
No other animal SHUT THE FUCK UP YOU FUCKING IDIOT.
 

Jive Turkey

Karen
6,728
9,119
Again, it's not basing analyses on idealistic notions of 'love', 'follow your heart', etc, and if you use that language, as I said, your conception of, your description of reality takes a religious tone, whereas mine is grounded in rationalism.
Love is an emotion just the same as anger is an emotion. Do you pretend anger doesn't exist? Just because there is a chemical process behind it doesn't make it less valid. Everything you've ever felt in your entire life is a result of chemical and electrical signals. When you get mad do you post on your neckbeard forums about the evolutionary reasons behind what "society and religion call anger"? You're so wet between the legs when you talk about the "evolutionary" (quotes because you've provided zero evidence) reasons behind mate selection, but want to ignore the very real and very important feeling of love (an actual evolutionary solution). Pretending love isn't a thing makes you sound like you're trying too hard to be a 'man'.