Red Pill Thread 2.0: Neckbeard Revenge

  • Guest, it's time once again for the massively important and exciting FoH Asshat Tournament!



    Go here and give us your nominations!
    Who's been the biggest Asshat in the last year? Give us your worst ones!
McCheese

McCheese

SW: Sean, CW: Crone, GW: Wizardhawk
6,920
4,319
It would be pretty sweet if we discovered an animal that baked pies. Dogs wouldn't have shit on a pet that can bake pies.

*Edit* Then again, we'd probably discover it in the middle of a rain forest or in Australia and the pies it bakes would be poisonous.
 
ZyyzYzzy

ZyyzYzzy

RIP USA
<Banned>
25,295
48,789
Dumar, how about the Albatross?

Edit - I guess a redpiller would consider it the most beta of all animals due to its mating habits.
 
ZyyzYzzy

ZyyzYzzy

RIP USA
<Banned>
25,295
48,789
Dumar, how about the Clown Fish, which will change its sex if no other females are present? How about bacteria that reproduce asexually, plants that do? Are all these not species by a redpiller definition because they aren't out trying to slam as much p as they can?
 
Jive Turkey

Jive Turkey

Karen
6,728
9,119
McCheese_sl said:
It would be pretty sweet if we discovered an animal that baked pies. Dogs wouldn't have shit on a pet that can bake pies.

*Edit* Then again, we'd probably discover it in the middle of a rain forest or in Australia and the pies it bakes would be poisonous.
Click to expand...
ZyyzYzzy_sl said:
Dumar, how about the Albatross?

Edit - I guess a redpiller would consider it the most beta of all animals due to its mating habits.
Click to expand...
What I take from this series of posts is that albatrosses bake pies. Confirm or deny
 
Jive Turkey

Jive Turkey

Karen
6,728
9,119
ZyyzYzzy_sl said:
Dumar, how about the Clown Fish, which will change its sex if no other females are present? How about bacteria that reproduce asexually, plants that do? Are all these not species by a redpiller definition because they aren't out trying to slam as much p as they can?
Click to expand...
Red pillers want to deny hundreds of thousands of years of social evolution (and that's just hominids). It's all physical bro.
 
D

Dumar_sl

shitlord
3,712
4
Are you people going to sit here and defend a premise that humans, in fact, choose their mates differently than all other animals, and this choice is based onreasoned thought? Is that what I'm reading here? We drive cars, bake pies, absolutely, but none of those behaviors that require reasoned thought has any bearing whatsoever on the limbic impulse to procreate and how a mate is chosen to procreate with. That is solely based on perceived genetic quality and social dominance of a group (which plays into the supposed quality itself) - that's whatalpha is, distilled down to the matrix numbers, if you will. That is what's behind every woman and man's choice in a mate: perceived genetic quality and perceived reproductive fitness.

Again, I want to know if you're actually arguing the opposite, the notion that the mate selection of human beings is based on their reasoning, not genetic quality. That is a purely religious position, based solely in idealistic thinking (i.e., itshould be). I really want to hear this out of all of your mouths, as I haven't so thoroughly owned a mass group of people since UO days!
 
ZyyzYzzy

ZyyzYzzy

RIP USA
<Banned>
25,295
48,789
Dumar_sl said:
Are you people going to sit here and defend a premise that humans, in fact, choose their mates differently than all other animals, and this choice is based onreasoned thought? Is that what I'm reading here? We drive cars, bake pies, absolutely, but none of those behaviors that require reasoned thought has any bearing whatsoever on the limbic impulse to procreate and how a mate is chosen to procreate with. That is solely based on perceived genetic quality and social dominance of a group (which plays into the supposed quality itself) - that's whatalpha is, distilled down to the matrix numbers, if you will. That is what's behind every woman and man's choice in a mate: perceived genetic quality and perceived ability to reproduce.

Again, I want to know if you're actually arguing the opposite, the notion that the mate selection of human beings is based on their reasoning, not genetic quality. I really want to hear this out of all of your mouths: I haven't so thoroughly owned a mass group of people since UO days!
Click to expand...
Jesus fucking christ Dumar really? We do, actually most animals chose their mates in a manner that are specific to their species and current needs. Making broad generalizing statements about sexual reproduction of every species is asinine.
 
Jive Turkey

Jive Turkey

Karen
6,728
9,119
Dumar_sl said:
Are you people going to sit here and defend a premise that humans, in fact, choose their mates differently than all other animals, and this choice is based onreasoned thought? Is that what I'm reading here? We drive cars, bake pies, absolutely, but none of those behaviors that require reasoned thought has any bearing whatsoever on the limbic impulse to procreate and how a mate is chosen to procreate with. That is solely based on perceived genetic quality and social dominance of a group (which plays into the supposed quality itself) - that's whatalpha is, distilled down to the matrix numbers, if you will. That is what's behind every woman and man's choice in a mate: perceived genetic quality and perceived reproductive fitness.

Again, I want to know if you're actually arguing the opposite, the notion that the mate selection of human beings is based on their reasoning, not genetic quality. That is a purely religious position, based solely in idealistic thinking (i.e., itshould be). I really want to hear this out of all of your mouths, as I haven't so thoroughly owned a mass group of people since UO days!
Click to expand...
Just saying "humans choose a mate based on innate, evolutionarily based instincts" says fucking NOTHING. Nowhere did I say we're not instinctively driven. you will never hear me say that. I'm asking you to provide evidence that your retarded tenets are based on evidence of SPECIFIC INNATE MATE SELECTION CRITERIA. Not some pseudo-macho faux caveman thoughts on how you think things work.
YOU'RE the one basing your beliefs on "should be", because you haven't backed it up with evidence.

Again, tell me how this factors in to your cuckolding theory.
 
Abefroman

Abefroman

Naxxramas 1.0 Raider
12,594
11,938
Dumar_sl said:
Are you people going to sit here and defend a premise that humans, in fact, choose their mates differently than all other animals, and this choice is based onreasoned thought? Is that what I'm reading here? We drive cars, bake pies, absolutely, but none of those behaviors that require reasoned thought has any bearing whatsoever on the limbic impulse to procreate and how a mate is chosen to procreate with. That is solely based on perceived genetic quality and social dominance of a group (which plays into the supposed quality itself) - that's whatalpha is, distilled down to the matrix numbers, if you will. That is what's behind every woman and man's choice in a mate: perceived genetic quality and perceived reproductive fitness.

Again, I want to know if you're actually arguing the opposite, the notion that the mate selection of human beings is based on their reasoning, not genetic quality. That is a purely religious position, based solely in idealistic thinking (i.e., itshould be). I really want to hear this out of all of your mouths, as I haven't so thoroughly owned a mass group of people since UO days!
Click to expand...
My initial attraction to my wife was physical but what made me want to marry her was way more then that. I have a wife with similar interests and would rather hang out with her then a bunch of guys. We don't play relationship games because we both hate arguing and neither of us is afraid to admit fault and apoligize. My wife also makes more then me and I make a good buck myself. We share the chores and things that need to get done. I'd like you to explain how this is genetic quality and not personalities being very compatible. I come from a family with no divorces in the immediate family and I refuse to think I and my family are some unique exception in society.
 
ZyyzYzzy

ZyyzYzzy

RIP USA
<Banned>
25,295
48,789
Dumar_sl said:
That is what RP is describing.
Click to expand...
No it is not. Explain the Albatross? Why does the female Albatross not leave it's mate when a more fit and successful one comes along? Why does it stay with the same mate its entire life? You stated that all species act otherwise. Is the Albatross not a species?
 
khalid

khalid

Unelected Mod
14,071
6,775
Jive Turkey_sl said:
I'm not rooting through all that dogshit. I want this clown to explain it to me himself from an evolutionary standpoint
Click to expand...
You aren't going to get him to describe it, he can't. The Marxism shit is the same way. You complain that all he does is quote Marx, so he links you articles that also simply quote Marx.
 
TrollfaceDeux

TrollfaceDeux

Pronouns: zie/zhem/zer
<Bronze Donator>
19,577
3,743
Mist_sl said:
No other animal drives cars.
No other animal plays video games.
No other animal bakes pies.
No other animal SHUT THE FUCK UP YOU FUCKING IDIOT.
Click to expand...
this logic is the dumbest shit on this thread hands down. Intelligence and instinct go hand to hand.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.