Draegan_sl
2 Minutes Hate
- 10,034
- 3
Just to clarify some things here, I just banned Himeo for being a beta whiny bitch by abusing the report function.
Fair enough. Have to admit the whole albatros stuff and the "tell me again what is hypergamy"x10 have been a headscratcher. Hard to tell wtf was being argued there.He shifted into a completely different topic. I never needed RP to get laid. It helps me get more attractive women, to be sure.
His example is actually a trait that has quite a few genetic influences. Again, why are you even talking here? You literally have nothing to contribute because like the rest of these shitheads you are most likely autistic.Do u even read bro. Mostly he said.
Dumar stated that all species chose mates the same. How can that be applied to species that mate with multiple mates a mating season and also those that have one mate for their entire life? By his logic a female albatross would leave their mate as soon as a more successful male came along.Fair enough. Have to admit the whole albatros stuff and the "tell me again what is hypergamy"x10 have been a headscratcher. Hard to tell wtf was being argued there.
They won't. This isn't the 'lowest common denominator' of women - it's women's nature,natureitself, that limbic impulse to maximize reproductive chances with the best genes the woman can secure & make sure they're provided for. You're inserting some moralistic, idealistic constructs in the middle and labeling right or wrong, and they don't belong there, as they're man-made things.Again, you are lowering women to the lowest common denominator. If you are able to "rise above" your genetics and exploit behaviors, why can't women make rational decisions about who they ultimately mate with based on any number of factors rationally?
Did I?I think you missed the point: that he gave up the argument.
This post has been reported.Just to clarify some things here, I just banned Himeo for being a beta whiny bitch by abusing the report function.
No, you are. You are explicitly stating women have zero control over themselves and never base mating on rational reasoning.You're not getting it. This isn't the 'lowest common denominator' of women - it's women's nature,natureitself, that limbic impulse to maximize reproductive chances with the best genes the woman can secure & make sure they're provided for. You're inserting some moralistic, idealistic constructs in the middle and labeling right or wrong, and they don't belong there, as they're man-made things.
No. I didn't. I made an offhanded comment on another aspect of you muppets that I find amusing.He shifted into a completely different topic. I never needed RP to get laid. It helps me get more attractive women, to be sure.
I'll go ahead and assume he was reporting me, so take a gold starJust to clarify some things here, I just banned Himeo for being a beta whiny bitch by abusing the report function.
They havesomecontrol (drive cars, bake pies), yes, but it's not how they ultimately decide with whom to mate, no. That's the whole 'falling in love' narrative. Only after they're somewhat used up, 30+, do they reason at all about who they should enter into a sexual relationship with.No, you are. You are explicitly stating women have zero control over themselves and never base mating on rational reasoning.
Jesus fucking Christ. You are an idiot. Truly.They havesomecontrol, yes, but it's not how they ultimately decide with whom to mate, no. Only after they're somewhat used up, 30+, do they reason about who they should enter into a sexual relationship with.
Whatever helps you calm your insecurities.His example is actually a trait that has quite a few genetic influences. Again, why are you even talking here? You literally have nothing to contribute because like the rest of these shitheads you are most likely autistic.
Only women can, you know, actually think about their decisions and don't have to jump on a dick just because they find that person attractive at a certain point in their cycle. And the fact that you guys think your dick is what will "make them happy" is another hilarious delusionThey won't. This isn't the 'lowest common denominator' of women - it's women's nature,natureitself, that limbic impulse to maximize reproductive chances with the best genes the woman can secure & make sure they're provided for. You're inserting some moralistic, idealistic constructs in the middle and labeling right or wrong, and they don't belong there, as they're man-made things.
I'm just looking at reality as it is. I don't like what I see any more than you or anyone else.Jesus fucking Christ. You are an idiot. Truly.
Really, good luck ever having a meaningful relationship in life with that mentality.
And here we have it. You are a complete fucking retardThey havesomecontrol (drive cars, bake pies), yes, but it's not how they ultimately decide with whom to mate, no. That's the whole 'falling in love' narrative. Only after they're somewhat used up, 30+, do they reason at all about who they should enter into a sexual relationship with.
Cue thewhere have all the good men gone?!spiel.
Didn't we just go over this? You know, a few posts up about how women choose mates? Should we go over it again in case you two have forgotten already?And here we have it. You are a complete fucking retard
That has absolutely nothing to do with anything. Did you just learn about it & looking to apply it somewhere?Honestly, redpillis the epitome of Dunning-Kruger Effect. It's kind of amazing to watch