Just to clarify some things here, I just banned Himeo for being a beta whiny bitch by abusing the report function.
Red Pill Thread 2.0: Neckbeard Revenge
- Thread starter Himeo
- Start date
-
Guest, it's time once again for the massively important and exciting FoH Asshat Tournament!
Go here and give us your nominations!Who's been the biggest Asshat in the last year? Give us your worst ones!
Lejina
(╯°□°）╯︵ ┻━┻
- 4,720
- 12,350
Fair enough. Have to admit the whole albatros stuff and the "tell me again what is hypergamy"x10 have been a headscratcher. Hard to tell wtf was being argued there.
ZyyzYzzy
RIP USA
- 25,295
- 48,789
His example is actually a trait that has quite a few genetic influences. Again, why are you even talking here? You literally have nothing to contribute because like the rest of these shitheads you are most likely autistic.
ZyyzYzzy
RIP USA
- 25,295
- 48,789
Dumar stated that all species chose mates the same. How can that be applied to species that mate with multiple mates a mating season and also those that have one mate for their entire life? By his logic a female albatross would leave their mate as soon as a more successful male came along.
They won't. This isn't the 'lowest common denominator' of women - it's women's nature,natureitself, that limbic impulse to maximize reproductive chances with the best genes the woman can secure & make sure they're provided for. You're inserting some moralistic, idealistic constructs in the middle and labeling right or wrong, and they don't belong there, as they're man-made things.
Jive Turkey
Karen
- 6,728
- 9,119
Did I?
"Your wife spends half the ovulatory cycle craving cock from short term relationships. The implication is this is bad for a relationship if your wife isn't attracted to you more than any other option available to her."
So if you're a redpillalpha neckbeard, your wife isn't attracted to you for the rest of her cycle.... what's your point?
And again, redpillis nothing but the Dunning-Kruger Effect run amok.
Not to mention, you can't dismiss rational thought in these scenarios, even though you'd like to.
- 47,665
- 222,337
ZyyzYzzy
RIP USA
- 25,295
- 48,789
No, you are. You are explicitly stating women have zero control over themselves and never base mating on rational reasoning.
Jive Turkey
Karen
- 6,728
- 9,119
No. I didn't. I made an offhanded comment on another aspect of you muppets that I find amusing.
Jive Turkey
Karen
- 6,728
- 9,119
They havesomecontrol (drive cars, bake pies), yes, but it's not how they ultimately decide with whom to mate, no. That's the whole 'falling in love' narrative. Only after they're somewhat used up, 30+, do they reason at all about who they should enter into a sexual relationship with.
Cue thewhere have all the good men gone?!spiel.
ZyyzYzzy
RIP USA
- 25,295
- 48,789
Jesus fucking Christ. You are an idiot. Truly.
Really, good luck ever having a meaningful relationship in life with that mentality.
TrollfaceDeux
Pronouns: zie/zhem/zer
- 19,577
- 3,743
Jive Turkey
Karen
- 6,728
- 9,119
Only women can, you know, actually think about their decisions and don't have to jump on a dick just because they find that person attractive at a certain point in their cycle. And the fact that you guys think your dick is what will "make them happy" is another hilarious delusion
I'm just looking at reality as it is. I don't like what I see any more than you or anyone else.
Jive Turkey
Karen
- 6,728
- 9,119
Didn't we just go over this? You know, a few posts up about how women choose mates? Should we go over it again in case you two have forgotten already?
Jive Turkey
Karen
- 6,728
- 9,119
That has absolutely nothing to do with anything. Did you just learn about it & looking to apply it somewhere?
Out for the night, bai.
- 47,665
- 222,337
It's actually quite hard to tell who is trolling, and who is being serious in this thread. There's a lot of dumb going around.