Red Pill Thread 2.0: Neckbeard Revenge

  • Guest, it's time once again for the massively important and exciting FoH Asshat Tournament!



    Go here and give us your nominations!
    Who's been the biggest Asshat in the last year? Give us your worst ones!

Draegan_sl

2 Minutes Hate
10,034
3
Just to clarify some things here, I just banned Himeo for being a beta whiny bitch by abusing the report function.
 

Lejina

(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
<Bronze Donator>
4,670
12,176
He shifted into a completely different topic. I never needed RP to get laid. It helps me get more attractive women, to be sure.
Fair enough. Have to admit the whole albatros stuff and the "tell me again what is hypergamy"x10 have been a headscratcher. Hard to tell wtf was being argued there.
 

ZyyzYzzy

RIP USA
<Banned>
25,295
48,789
Do u even read bro. Mostly he said.
His example is actually a trait that has quite a few genetic influences. Again, why are you even talking here? You literally have nothing to contribute because like the rest of these shitheads you are most likely autistic.
 

ZyyzYzzy

RIP USA
<Banned>
25,295
48,789
Fair enough. Have to admit the whole albatros stuff and the "tell me again what is hypergamy"x10 have been a headscratcher. Hard to tell wtf was being argued there.
Dumar stated that all species chose mates the same. How can that be applied to species that mate with multiple mates a mating season and also those that have one mate for their entire life? By his logic a female albatross would leave their mate as soon as a more successful male came along.
 

Dumar_sl

shitlord
3,712
4
Again, you are lowering women to the lowest common denominator. If you are able to "rise above" your genetics and exploit behaviors, why can't women make rational decisions about who they ultimately mate with based on any number of factors rationally?
They won't. This isn't the 'lowest common denominator' of women - it's women's nature,natureitself, that limbic impulse to maximize reproductive chances with the best genes the woman can secure & make sure they're provided for. You're inserting some moralistic, idealistic constructs in the middle and labeling right or wrong, and they don't belong there, as they're man-made things.
 

Jive Turkey

Karen
6,720
9,081
I think you missed the point: that he gave up the argument.
Did I?

"Your wife spends half the ovulatory cycle craving cock from short term relationships. The implication is this is bad for a relationship if your wife isn't attracted to you more than any other option available to her."

So if you're a redpillalpha neckbeard, your wife isn't attracted to you for the rest of her cycle.... what's your point?

And again, redpillis nothing but the Dunning-Kruger Effect run amok.

Not to mention, you can't dismiss rational thought in these scenarios, even though you'd like to.
 

ZyyzYzzy

RIP USA
<Banned>
25,295
48,789
You're not getting it. This isn't the 'lowest common denominator' of women - it's women's nature,natureitself, that limbic impulse to maximize reproductive chances with the best genes the woman can secure & make sure they're provided for. You're inserting some moralistic, idealistic constructs in the middle and labeling right or wrong, and they don't belong there, as they're man-made things.
No, you are. You are explicitly stating women have zero control over themselves and never base mating on rational reasoning.
 

Dumar_sl

shitlord
3,712
4
No, you are. You are explicitly stating women have zero control over themselves and never base mating on rational reasoning.
They havesomecontrol (drive cars, bake pies), yes, but it's not how they ultimately decide with whom to mate, no. That's the whole 'falling in love' narrative. Only after they're somewhat used up, 30+, do they reason at all about who they should enter into a sexual relationship with.

Cue thewhere have all the good men gone?!spiel.
 

ZyyzYzzy

RIP USA
<Banned>
25,295
48,789
They havesomecontrol, yes, but it's not how they ultimately decide with whom to mate, no. Only after they're somewhat used up, 30+, do they reason about who they should enter into a sexual relationship with.
Jesus fucking Christ. You are an idiot. Truly.

Really, good luck ever having a meaningful relationship in life with that mentality.
 

TrollfaceDeux

Pronouns: zie/zhem/zer
<Bronze Donator>
19,577
3,743
His example is actually a trait that has quite a few genetic influences. Again, why are you even talking here? You literally have nothing to contribute because like the rest of these shitheads you are most likely autistic.
Whatever helps you calm your insecurities.
 

Jive Turkey

Karen
6,720
9,081
They won't. This isn't the 'lowest common denominator' of women - it's women's nature,natureitself, that limbic impulse to maximize reproductive chances with the best genes the woman can secure & make sure they're provided for. You're inserting some moralistic, idealistic constructs in the middle and labeling right or wrong, and they don't belong there, as they're man-made things.
Only women can, you know, actually think about their decisions and don't have to jump on a dick just because they find that person attractive at a certain point in their cycle. And the fact that you guys think your dick is what will "make them happy" is another hilarious delusion
 

Jive Turkey

Karen
6,720
9,081
They havesomecontrol (drive cars, bake pies), yes, but it's not how they ultimately decide with whom to mate, no. That's the whole 'falling in love' narrative. Only after they're somewhat used up, 30+, do they reason at all about who they should enter into a sexual relationship with.

Cue thewhere have all the good men gone?!spiel.
And here we have it. You are a complete fucking retard
 

lurkingdirk

AssHat Taint
<Medals Crew>
46,611
214,455
It's actually quite hard to tell who is trolling, and who is being serious in this thread. There's a lot of dumb going around.