Speaking purely about Red Dragon. The movie was a fairly faithful adaptation of the book; however, Ralph Fiennes, Philip Seymour Hoffman, and Edward Norton, while capable, could not make the movie more compelling. It fell into that category of capably performed, soulless mediocrity. Compared to Silence of the Lambs, little felt new or original.manhunter was scary as fuck. thats not to say red dragon was shit either. i read the book and both films are excellent adaptions in their own way. manhunter is just better because it relied on psychological terror while red dragon was visual horror.
They're all stupid, it just depends on how much you'll let slide.Exactly. Zombie movies are also about slow, but inexorable death inevitably followed by joining the ranks of the bad guys.
Fast moving zombies are stupid because no one would survive an encounter with more than one of them. Period. Of course fast moving zombies are scarier than slow ones. They are certain death. All the movies with fast moving zombie should be boring and over in about 5 minutes, but they build in horseshit conceits to keep the main characters alive which more often than not takes them from merely bad action movies to fucking terrible ones.
The idea that slow moving zombies could overrun heavily fortified military installations is even more silly.They're all stupid, it just depends on how much you'll let slide.
Zombie movies are all about hoplessness. I find the fast zombies much more scary, because the idea that I'm safe as long as I walk at a brisk pace is just silly.
I hate how all the new zombie movies are about science, somehow there is a virus or something that caused it. The original zombie premise is that hell is FULL, so the dead shall walk the earth. Cool stuff, its supernatural, bad things are happening. Trying to use science to explain a zombie has just made every movie zombie different with different rules.The idea that slow moving zombies could overrun heavily fortified military installations is even more silly.
That's a really dumb complaint dude.I hate how all the new zombie movies are about science, somehow there is a virus or something that caused it. The original zombie premise is that hell is FULL, so the dead shall walk the earth. Cool stuff, its supernatural, bad things are happening. Trying to use science to explain a zombie has just made every movie zombie different with different rules.
In Night of the Living Dead the news speculates that a probe returning from Venus, contaminated with space radiation, is the cause.I hate how all the new zombie movies are about science, somehow there is a virus or something that caused it. The original zombie premise is that hell is FULL, so the dead shall walk the earth. Cool stuff, its supernatural, bad things are happening. Trying to use science to explain a zombie has just made every movie zombie different with different rules.
Movie tagline.Wasn't that "hell is full" shit some religious ranting guy on a still operational TV station in Dawn of the Dead? Not an official explanation, just some holy roller.
Ah yeah, that's it.in the reboot, Tony Todd (candyman) made a cameo as a religious nutjob and he said that line about hell being fulll
Yeah. The only serious attempt to show how slowmoving zombies could do this was done in the book World War Z. Even then though, I felt it really wasn't plausible. You have to assume that no one is scouting (so you can get flanked, otherwise you just run away and recover), no one is taking the threat seriously and that all your troops will panic.The idea that slow moving zombies could overrun heavily fortified military installations is even more silly.