I told you repeatedly what you did, and yet you continue to try to justify it as sarcasm, socratic questioning, and innocent misunderstandings. While claiming to be on the same side as I am. In other words, these are LIES. Obfuscations, misleading statements, questions whose answers indicate your position while minimizing or dismissing others' positions.
In your mind? Anyone who says what you said is either A: lying, B: stupid, or C: unaware of what they're doing. You're not unaware, since you say you're trying to get people to think by asking them 'socratic questions'. We told you what that article was, it was chaff intended to cover their bases for all the PREVIOUS lies they told about UKR and RU. You know, back when it counted. It's analogous to the "Front Page Big Lie!!" followed by "Page 10 Correction" 2 weeks later, when everyone knew it was a lie on day 1 as soon as they said it. We said all of this at the time. We've been saying it in regards to UKR + RU for 3 years. We've been saying it about MSM in general for at least 8 years, but more like 10 or 12.
So, if we give you the benefit of the doubt that you aren't so stupid to not know what the MSM (BBC in this case) is doing, that makes you a lying piece of shit. He who repeats lies as authoritative is no better than the original liar, especially when they continue to assert the possible accuracy of known liars and propagandists as justification for continuing to post their lies.
And why would I ban you? Maybe if we hit you over the head enough times with this shit, you'll finally get it. It's a small hope, but hey.
en.m.wikipedia.org
