Pro tip; 50% of the secrecy that surrounds groups like delta force or the cia is designed specifically to make them look scarier and more capable than they actually are, the other 50% is used as a get out of jail free card.Hell, imagine what the military is doingright nowunder their cloak of secrecy. They were 40+ years ahead of the general population back in the 60's. I can only imagine that gap is even much wider with how fast technology improves and how much their black budgets have expanded.
There are a couple videos about these already, they are totally impractical and pointless. It is much cheaper and far more efficient to put panels that track the sun on roofs and other man-made flat surfaces, roads are pretty much theworstplace to put solar panels. A rooftop system can generate the same amount of kwh at a tiny fraction of the cost and over much less space.Apparently its moving right along-
Dutch solar road makes enough energy to power household - Al Jazeera English
This Jet Engine was made by a 3D printer | PC ProEngineers at GE Aviation's Additive Development Center in Cincinnati have made the world's 3D printed first jet engine using one of the devices... Measuring roughly a foot in length and 8in in height, the jet won't be powering jumbo jets anytime soon, but it is fully functional - accelerating to a maximum of 33,000 revolutions per minute.
The point would be with 3d printing its far cheaper even if it doesn't perform as well due to material durability.That's cool. I'd love to see some data on how it performs vs traditional methods.
Probably wouldn't be useful for planes but would open up jet power for all sorts of things its not feasible for now. How about a scooter?That's what I want flying my planes. Less durable, cheaper jet engines.
I agree, but the point of rockets is propulsion and I wonder what the disparity is.The point would be with 3d printing its far cheaper even if it doesn't perform as well due to material durability.
It's not the same people who own the roads and who own the rooftops though. Also, depending on the cities, the public buildings that municipalities own the rooftops of might be historical buildings that cannot be covered in solar panels.There are a couple videos about these already, they are totally impractical and pointless. It is much cheaper and far more efficient to put panels that track the sun on roofs and other man-made flat surfaces, roads are pretty much theworstplace to put solar panels. A rooftop system can generate the same amount of kwh at a tiny fraction of the cost and over much less space.
Not to mention you need more infrastructure to link roads to the grid as opposed to buildings which are already connected to the grid.
And a rooftop system the guy in the video installed on his house that generates the same amount of electricity as that 70 meter 3 million euro waste of money.