Yeah I get that, but are we talking about injecting phantom images into our brain so that the mouse thinks it sees the left lever's light luminate? Or are we talking about injecting 'knowledge' into the mouse' brain so that it 'knows' that it should push the left lever?Like learning a language? The words you're reading right now and then use to type up a response are encoded messages all the same. Instead of your eyes being the stimulus, it's an electrical wire. Which, if I understand basic brain chemistry, isn't that much different.
I'd imagine a human under instruction to focus on the foreign knowledge could learn to utilize it much quicker. Also this is very rudimentary stuff, I'd imagine it gets much more complex before we see any practical use."[It] takes about 45 days of training an hour a day," said Prof Nicolelis.
"There is a moment in time when... it clicks. Suddenly the [decoder] animal realises: 'Oops! The solution is in my head. It's coming to me' and he gets it right."
Other information mediums are slow since they are, at the very least, inhibited by the brain's sensors for that medium(eyes, ears, mouth, etc). Secondly, the type of medium could be inherently slow. Like reading a book. Or the speed of sound. Jacking directly into someone's brain bypasses all of that. The limiting factor at that point might become the brain's ability to process information.Yeah I get that, but are we talking about injecting phantom images into our brain so that the mouse thinks it sees the left lever's light luminate? Or are we talking about injecting 'knowledge' into the mouse' brain so that it 'knows' that it should push the left lever?
Because if it's the former it'd be hard to imagine a use case that beats a visual representation. And if it's the latter I don't know if it's plausible to communicate in a way that exceeds other information mediums.
I think we can agree on that. There's just a question of what that limiting factor is.The limiting factor at that point might become the brain's ability to process information.
I would think that it won't ever be possible to simply "jack-in" knowledge, skills, or even complex memories like in the Matrix. The reason being is that learning a skill or a language or forming a memory all involve physical changes in the brain's circuitry. Even if you could create some sort of conduit to feed information in to a brain, I can't see it being possible for the physical changes to happen instantaneously. It's not a process that you could ever mechanically direct, since every brain is unique. You couldn't just tell the brain "okay connect these couple billion neurons together in this fashion to learn French."Yeah I was also thinking about making a kung fu reference. I'd just like to read a paper from a real neurochemist discussing the plausibility of direct information transmission for complex ideas. Being able to transmit a binary message to a mouse is cool but scalability can't be assumed.
http://www.nature.com/srep/2013/1302...srep01319.htmlPaper_sl said:Animals assigned to the decoder group were implanted with arrays of 4 to 6 microstimulation electrodes in the primary motor cortex and were further trained to associate the presence of electrical microstimulation pulses with the correct lever press. Extra training followed, with a sequence of 60 to 100 pulses indicating a correct choice in the right lever while the absence of microstimulation pulses (1 pulse) indicated a correct left lever choice. During the electrical microstimulation training phase a trial started with a brief period of white noise, followed by the electrical microstimulation cue. Immediately after this cue both LEDs were turned on. If a correct choice was made the reward port would open and the animal was allowed a brief period of access to water (300 ms), otherwise both LEDs were turned off and the intertrial interval started.
Yep. Magic newborns.article_sl said:"Given that this cure appears to have been achieved by antiretroviral therapy alone," said Dr. Johnston, "it is also imperative that we learn more about a newborn's immune system, how it differs from an adult's, and what factors made it possible for the child to be cured."
Depends on what you mean by data, I guess. Sensory processing and integration is no small shit and the vast majority of our brains are devoted to that task.I'm sure if this brain technology being discussed turns out to be viable at some point in the future, a system can be developed to do "physical therapy" in conjunction with the "knowledge downloads" to help a person become proficient at a skill that requires more than just the brain.
How much "data" can the human brain hold anyways? It has to be a lot but I'd guess that there would be some quantifiable limit to storage capacity.
I had a friend with a photographic memory and he would always complain about how scientists would always want to do tests and other "experiments" on him. Dude was legit, he would teach college classes without a textbook, he'd just recite the course lesson and information out of the text book. I found it fascinating but I can understand how being under a microscope can be a bit upsetting.