Science!! Fucking magnets, how do they work?

  • Guest, it's time once again for the massively important and exciting FoH Asshat Tournament!



    Go here and give us your nominations!
    Who's been the biggest Asshat in the last year? Give us your worst ones!

Eomer

Trakanon Raider
5,472
272
It will be like any other new invention: young people who grow up with it will be far more adept at it than those who grew up without it.
 

Tuco

I got Tuco'd!
<Gold Donor>
47,381
80,799
Like learning a language? The words you're reading right now and then use to type up a response are encoded messages all the same. Instead of your eyes being the stimulus, it's an electrical wire. Which, if I understand basic brain chemistry, isn't that much different.
Yeah I get that, but are we talking about injecting phantom images into our brain so that the mouse thinks it sees the left lever's light luminate? Or are we talking about injecting 'knowledge' into the mouse' brain so that it 'knows' that it should push the left lever?

Because if it's the former it'd be hard to imagine a use case that beats a visual representation. And if it's the latter I don't know if it's plausible to communicate in a way that exceeds other information mediums.
 

The Ancient_sl

shitlord
7,386
16
The article seems to indicate it was the latter.

"[It] takes about 45 days of training an hour a day," said Prof Nicolelis.

"There is a moment in time when... it clicks. Suddenly the [decoder] animal realises: 'Oops! The solution is in my head. It's coming to me' and he gets it right."
I'd imagine a human under instruction to focus on the foreign knowledge could learn to utilize it much quicker. Also this is very rudimentary stuff, I'd imagine it gets much more complex before we see any practical use.

i+know+kung+fu.png
 

Tuco

I got Tuco'd!
<Gold Donor>
47,381
80,799
Yeah I was also thinking about making a kung fu reference. I'd just like to read a paper from a real neurochemist discussing the plausibility of direct information transmission for complex ideas. Being able to transmit a binary message to a mouse is cool but scalability can't be assumed.
 

Deathwing

<Bronze Donator>
16,739
7,767
Yeah I get that, but are we talking about injecting phantom images into our brain so that the mouse thinks it sees the left lever's light luminate? Or are we talking about injecting 'knowledge' into the mouse' brain so that it 'knows' that it should push the left lever?

Because if it's the former it'd be hard to imagine a use case that beats a visual representation. And if it's the latter I don't know if it's plausible to communicate in a way that exceeds other information mediums.
Other information mediums are slow since they are, at the very least, inhibited by the brain's sensors for that medium(eyes, ears, mouth, etc). Secondly, the type of medium could be inherently slow. Like reading a book. Or the speed of sound. Jacking directly into someone's brain bypasses all of that. The limiting factor at that point might become the brain's ability to process information.
 

Tuco

I got Tuco'd!
<Gold Donor>
47,381
80,799
The limiting factor at that point might become the brain's ability to process information.
I think we can agree on that. There's just a question of what that limiting factor is.

I'd be interested in finding out what exactly they did to the decoder mouse to achieve communication. Feeding in a binary value can be done in many different ways, most of which are really just hacks.
 

Eomer

Trakanon Raider
5,472
272
Yeah I was also thinking about making a kung fu reference. I'd just like to read a paper from a real neurochemist discussing the plausibility of direct information transmission for complex ideas. Being able to transmit a binary message to a mouse is cool but scalability can't be assumed.
I would think that it won't ever be possible to simply "jack-in" knowledge, skills, or even complex memories like in the Matrix. The reason being is that learning a skill or a language or forming a memory all involve physical changes in the brain's circuitry. Even if you could create some sort of conduit to feed information in to a brain, I can't see it being possible for the physical changes to happen instantaneously. It's not a process that you could ever mechanically direct, since every brain is unique. You couldn't just tell the brain "okay connect these couple billion neurons together in this fashion to learn French."

That said, perhaps learning skills and languages could be sped up or assisted through that kind of technology, almost like VR or a holodeck but inside your mind.
 

Tuco

I got Tuco'd!
<Gold Donor>
47,381
80,799
I took a closer look at the paper, here's where they describe the comms:
Paper_sl said:
Animals assigned to the decoder group were implanted with arrays of 4 to 6 microstimulation electrodes in the primary motor cortex and were further trained to associate the presence of electrical microstimulation pulses with the correct lever press. Extra training followed, with a sequence of 60 to 100 pulses indicating a correct choice in the right lever while the absence of microstimulation pulses (1 pulse) indicated a correct left lever choice. During the electrical microstimulation training phase a trial started with a brief period of white noise, followed by the electrical microstimulation cue. Immediately after this cue both LEDs were turned on. If a correct choice was made the reward port would open and the animal was allowed a brief period of access to water (300 ms), otherwise both LEDs were turned off and the intertrial interval started.
http://www.nature.com/srep/2013/1302...srep01319.html


I don't know what 100 microstimulation pulses to the primary motor cortex would do, but my guess is that it's some kind of irritant or the most hilarious case it causes the mouse to twitch uncontrollably. If that's true good luck reading a book via a series of twitches.
 
922
3
I'm sure if this brain technology being discussed turns out to be viable at some point in the future, a system can be developed to do "physical therapy" in conjunction with the "knowledge downloads" to help a person become proficient at a skill that requires more than just the brain.


How much "data" can the human brain hold anyways? It has to be a lot but I'd guess that there would be some quantifiable limit to storage capacity.

I had a friend with a photographic memory and he would always complain about how scientists would always want to do tests and other "experiments" on him. Dude was legit, he would teach college classes without a textbook, he'd just recite the course lesson and information out of the text book. I found it fascinating but I can understand how being under a microscope can be a bit upsetting.
 

Tuco

I got Tuco'd!
<Gold Donor>
47,381
80,799
article_sl said:
"Given that this cure appears to have been achieved by antiretroviral therapy alone," said Dr. Johnston, "it is also imperative that we learn more about a newborn's immune system, how it differs from an adult's, and what factors made it possible for the child to be cured."
Yep. Magic newborns.
 
653
1
Germans did it already on an adult. Patient had a bone marrow transplant for cancer and the doner had a rare genetic mutation that makes their T-cells (I think) resistant to HIV. Some time after the transplant they couldn't find the virus in his blood.
 

iannis

Musty Nester
31,351
17,656
I'm sure if this brain technology being discussed turns out to be viable at some point in the future, a system can be developed to do "physical therapy" in conjunction with the "knowledge downloads" to help a person become proficient at a skill that requires more than just the brain.


How much "data" can the human brain hold anyways? It has to be a lot but I'd guess that there would be some quantifiable limit to storage capacity.

I had a friend with a photographic memory and he would always complain about how scientists would always want to do tests and other "experiments" on him. Dude was legit, he would teach college classes without a textbook, he'd just recite the course lesson and information out of the text book. I found it fascinating but I can understand how being under a microscope can be a bit upsetting.
Depends on what you mean by data, I guess. Sensory processing and integration is no small shit and the vast majority of our brains are devoted to that task.

Confucian scholars could recite volumes of verse exactly. But they studied for years to do it, and I mean what do you use that astounding ability of memory forbesidesfor reciting volumes of verse? I'm sure the potential is there, but what practical use it is really to carry 1/20th of wikipedia around in your head when you can carry the entire thing around in your ipad. Kind of a party trick.


The HIV baby is pretty neat.
 

Big Phoenix

Pronouns: zie/zhem/zer
<Gold Donor>
46,381
98,539
Is water wet? Always find it funny when scientist state the obvious(at least to anyone who keeps up on the subject at hand). Hell Mars was also probably a lot warmer and had a signifcantly more dense atmosphere long ago too.
 

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,672
18,377
I'm not some PETA member or even that big on animal rights for the most part, but medical research shouldn't be allowed on Chimpanzees and Bonobos and other great apes. One they're all endangered, two in the case of chimpanzees and bonobos they are incredibly close to us genetically, with fairly robust cognitive abilities.

Maybe its just the anthropologist in me but I'd like to see some aspects of human rights extended to our closest relatives. Chimpanzees are so much like humans, research regarding them should be mostly along the lines of Jane Goodall observation research and the like, rather than medical/pharmaceutical/makeup and other research.

Great video.