Poll Should Tanoomba's ban be lifted

Free the moonbat?

  • Yes

    Votes: 61 40.1%

  • No

    Votes: 91 59.9%
  • Total voters
    152
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Hoss

Hoss

Make America's Team Great Again
<Gold Donor>
25,588
12,059
Pops said:
Can we all at least agree, Soygen's new avatar has to go?
Click to expand...

He should use this.
f8e.jpg
 
  • 1Worf
Reactions: 1 user
Tanoomba

Tanoomba

ジョーディーすれいやー
<Banned>
10,170
1,439
Soygen said:
Why was he unbanned? I've been very vocal about thinking the ban was stupid and I really don't like seeing anyone permabanned, but at this point I'd rather he just stay banned instead of listening to the whining in multiple threads from all the easily triggered faggots.
Click to expand...
Why are you holding me responsible for the whining of faggots? Why aren't we pointing and laughing at them for being easily triggered snowflakes who need to be protected from points of view they don't like?


Noodleface said:
It's just toxic all around for him to be here
Click to expand...
See this here? This is bullshit. Stop tossing "toxic" around like you have any clue what it means. "Toxic" is harassing other users. "Toxic" is spamming shit posts when someone you don't like says something. "Toxic" is campaigning for months and months to try to get people you don't like banned.

"Expressing points of view you don't like" is not "toxic".


kegkilla said:
is it Tanoomba's fault that moderators have thus far allowed Zyzzyxy to get away with spamming eat shit and die after everyone one of his posts? if you want to talk toxicity, let's start there.
Click to expand...
"Toxic" is just a means to an end for them. It means whatever they want it to mean as long as they can use it to rationalize punishing me. The fact that actual toxic behavior goes not only unpunished but rewarded is the whipped cream on this hypocrisy pie.
 
  • 3Salty
  • 2Picard
  • 1Solidarity
Reactions: 5 users
Noodleface

Noodleface

A Mod Real Quick
37,961
14,508
Tanoomba I didn't say you were toxic; you being here creates a certain toxicity. If you don't believe that then you're trolling harder than I ever thought you were.
 
Ridas

Ridas

Pay to play forum
2,868
4,111
Tanoomba said:
Why are you holding me responsible for the whining of faggots? Why aren't we pointing and laughing at them for being easily triggered snowflakes who need to be protected from points of view they don't like?



See this here? This is bullshit. Stop tossing "toxic" around like you have any clue what it means. "Toxic" is harassing other users. "Toxic" is spamming shit posts when someone you don't like says something. "Toxic" is campaigning for months and months to try to get people you don't like banned.

"Expressing points of view you don't like" is not "toxic".



"Toxic" is just a means to an end for them. It means whatever they want it to mean as long as they can use it to rationalize punishing me. The fact that actual toxic behavior goes not only unpunished but rewarded is the whipped cream on this hypocrisy pie.
Click to expand...

judge_you_are_a_faggot.jpg
 
  • 5Solidarity
  • 1Like
Reactions: 5 users
kegkilla

kegkilla

The Big Mod
<Banned>
11,320
14,738
Noodleface said:
Tanoomba I didn't say you were toxic; you being here creates a certain toxicity. If you don't believe that then you're trolling harder than I ever thought you were.
Click to expand...
so why are we punishing him instead of the actual toxic users? not good logic
 
  • 2Solidarity
  • 1Salty
  • 1Picard
Reactions: 3 users
Lendarios

Lendarios

Trump's Staff
<Gold Donor>
19,360
-17,424
@ noddle

ohyou.gif

We had a 3 page discussion on the many ways I should die executed on the wall alongside Tolan and xzxzxzyyzxyzx.

If you don't think that is toxic.
 
  • 2Salty
Reactions: 1 users
A

a_skeleton_03

<Banned>
29,948
29,762
kegkilla said:
so why are we punishing him instead of the actual toxic users? not good logic
Click to expand...
I already discussed this a while back.

If a person is so reviled and incompatible with a community yet doesn't quite break the rules why does he still need to be around?

At what point do you need to sacrifice the one to keep the many posting?

Because you know there are people that abandon threads just because he parachutes into them.

You always talk about keeping the community together yet you pull this concern trolling bullshit about wanting to keep Tanoomba around.
 
  • 3Solidarity
  • 1Like
  • 1Picard
Reactions: 4 users
hodj

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,672
18,377
kegkilla said:
so why are we punishing him instead of the actual toxic users? not good logic
Click to expand...

9 straight months waking up every day and restarting the exact same argument from the day before at step 1 in the Gamergate thread, and in fact doing the exact same thing again as soon as he was unbanned = actual toxic user.

Your desperation to play the heel is leading you to myopia.
 
  • 2Picard
  • 1Like
Reactions: 2 users
ZyyzYzzy

ZyyzYzzy

RIP USA
<Banned>
25,295
48,789
Everyone becomes toxic after 2 minutes of Tanoomba Tanoomba 's rehashed bullshit.

The asshole literally argues semantics when the source even clarifies what the fuck was meant.

He is no value added.
 
  • 2Like
Reactions: 1 users
kegkilla

kegkilla

The Big Mod
<Banned>
11,320
14,738
a_skeleton_03 said:
I already discussed this a while back.

If a person is so reviled and incompatible with a community yet doesn't quite break the rules why does he still need to be around?

At what point do you need to sacrifice the one to keep the many posting?

Because you know there are people that abandon threads just because he parachutes into them.

You always talk about keeping the community together yet you pull this concern trolling bullshit about wanting to keep Tanoomba around.
Click to expand...
yeah I mean if you want to continue to grow a community of white nationalists, then banning Tanoomba is probably a great idea. give them the safe space they deserve.
 
  • 2Salty
  • 2Picard
  • 2Worf
Reactions: 6 users
Lendarios

Lendarios

Trump's Staff
<Gold Donor>
19,360
-17,424
ZyyzYzzy said:
The asshole literally argues semantics when the source even clarifies what the fuck was meant.

He is no value added.
Click to expand...

I think everyone here does that.
Everyone but me, because I cant understand semantics. If I could I would split semantical hairs all day long.

For example, we are just talking about silencers not working because they don't "silence" all the way.
 
  • 2Like
  • 2Salty
Reactions: 3 users
Lendarios

Lendarios

Trump's Staff
<Gold Donor>
19,360
-17,424
I mean just look at this post full of insight rational thought and discourse.

"Shitlib cunt actually believes silencers exist."
 
  • 4Salty
  • 1Like
Reactions: 4 users
hodj

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,672
18,377
Oh look, we're doing the "The forum doesn't cater to my political tastes any more, therefore I'm going to concern troll about the community" schtick again.
 
  • 1Like
  • 1Picard
Reactions: 1 users
hodj

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,672
18,377
Hey kegkilla kegkilla , if you want the forum to cater to your political tastes again, try making a better case for your position than spamming every thread with pedophilia butthurt.
 
  • 1Solidarity
  • 1Like
  • 1Picard
Reactions: 2 users
Soygen

Soygen

The Dirty Dozen For the Price of One
<Nazi Janitors>
28,326
43,169
I think it's time for a hodj vs Tanoomba poll.
 
  • 2Salty
  • 2Like
  • 1Worf
Reactions: 4 users
Status
Not open for further replies.