My girlfriend stumbled across this today:
http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/...eturn?ref=live
Now, this isn't as egregiousness as some projects since the top open contributions are essentially the cost of the game. But why on earth is a very successful company using kickstarter to fund the sequel to one of their most successful franchises? That is like, I don't know, Rockstar holding a kickstarter to make GTA5 or something. They are using Kickstarter as a cheap pre-order campaign, that is not what it is supposed to be for.
It is a shame when an otherwise excellent idea if being abused to the detriment of people that have no other recourse for funding projects.
There ARE some valid reasons for a company to do it. For the devs its obviously win-win. They get the consumers to pay for the thing before they even start. no risk at all. Then keep any profits.. Its no surprise that devs are ditching producers for this. And is that really a bad thing? In a digital marketplace we don't really need producers fighting for shelf space, and advertising. So all they are really doing is fronting dev costs.
In theory, it should be a litmus test for interest. Lets say you are Valve. you start a kickstarter for half-life3, and a kickstarter for new Ip. Then this allows us to vote with our money for which we would rather have.
The AAA market is probably crashing. Look at the Square-enix fiasco. Hugely successful games and they are going broke, because 2-3million units sold is not enough for profit. or Amular. Or THQ, etc. but publishers are still forcing these AAA games. Crowdfunding does allow again, skipping publishers and making games that they wouldn't deem worth making.
This however, is not quite working out perfectly.
The problem is fame is easily leveraged on kickstarter. Games are not funded on merit, they are funded on how famous the starter is. Or how good of a huckster they are.
But in general, publisher influence has created far too many bad things in gaming. Devs finding a way around them, I don't have a problem with.
I feel Kickstarter needs a hell of alot more vetting, and accountability. If its going to be "buyer beware", then each starter should be required to provide extensive background material for investors to do some research. And then if this background material is falsified, charges of fraud can be applied, for real legal recourse.
But really kickstarter itself should be doing the background work, and certifying starters.