On the moto360 (and I presume it's the same on the iWatch) you can read your email/text on the watch. Aside from that, you can control Spotify/Audible and I also frequently use an app that shows my calendar. Once in a while, when I go to Starbucks, there's an app that lets me pay with my watch. Oh, and it displays the time & date, gives me updates on steps walked that day, and shows the weather in the morning.Can anyone explain to me the purpose of a smart watch? Like is it honestly that much more convenient compared to just taking your cellphone out to check that email? I mean you have to take your phone out to read/reply to that email anyway so what function does it serve?
I don't really get the hate for smartwatches. It's clearly not an earth shattering piece of technology, but so what?Alkorin_sl said:If you're a slave to your email or social media, and you simply MUST know everything the instant it happens, a smart watch is probably for you. If not, congrats, you're normal and you can stand to be away from your phone for a second or five.
In Column all things are possible, praise Column.This thread gave me diarrhea. How is that even possible?
No hate here, but I'll maintain that there is absolutely no use for a smart watch that can't just be a watch 99% of the time and a useful gadget when you need one. If I wanted a phone, I'd... oh, hey, I'm carrying my phone. I don't need another phone screen. Might just be me, though.I don't really get the hate for smartwatches. It's clearly not an earth shattering piece of technology, but so what?
You could say exactly the same thing about a smartphone. Presumably, you have a computer at home or in the office. Do youreallyneed email and social media updates while you're on the go?
Can't speak for the apple watch, but the moto 360's screen goes from off to a dimmed mode at the tiniest of movements. So even typing, it's easy to glance down at the watch and see the time. It goes to full brightness/listens to "ok Google" when I lift up my arm (e.g. to give a voice command). That works most of the time, but sometimes I have to quickly tap the screen.I'm kind of curious how well the motion sensor to turn on the clock face works. If you have to push a button to see the time then that's a deal breaker for me.
The moto 360 is generally known for not having a great battery. I think they improved battery life with software patches, though, and I now easily get a full day out of it. I start wearing the watch when I get up and put it back on the charger before I go to bed -- so about 18 hours of use, with 10-20% of the battery left by the end.Charging isn't a big deal as long as it gets you through the day. I don't mind taking the watch off and setting it on a wireless charger before I go to bed every night but if it is going to be dead at 6 PM then that's probably a deal breaker as well. I actually kind of prefer charging nightly to once a week just because it's easy to remember. Not that I wouldn't like the battery to last a long time, but if I had a pebble I would probably still charge it nightly.
Sure, but the purpose of any watch > $20 isn't to tell you the time. A $1,000 watch is jewelry that happens to tell the time. Nothing wrong with any of that, and I do think it's a nice item that can be passed on to future generations (although it might just go the way of the pocket watch: something you keep in a safety deposit box because it has sentimental value, but wouldn't actually use day to day). It's just a completely different domain from a smartwatch.Id rather get a nice $500-$1000 analog watch that wont be obsolete within a year and I can actually give to my son or grandson.
Yep. At that point, I might as well go back to wearing my Nano 6G as a watch. Yes, I was one of them.I'm kind of curious how well the motion sensor to turn on the clock face works. If you have to push a button to see the time then that's a deal breaker for me.
At the gym it sucks badly when checking time between reps and shit but then I just hate carrying my phone period in a gym.I never knew that taking a phone out of the pocket was such a burden to people. Is this target audience the same as those fat fucks that ride around in electric carts in grocery stores?
Funny how the more gizmos people get to help them work out the fatter the country gets. How did i manage to work out in the 90's without even a phone!At the gym it sucks badly when checking time between reps and shit but then I just hate carrying my phone period in a gym.
I actually dig the upcoming pebble watches more. The minimalist OS suits me more better then the over crowded apple watch or whatever it is called.
And this is what it all boils down to. This isnt about buying something that is useful/functional, its cosmetic. Apple isnt an electronics company, its a fashion company.Sure, but the purpose of any watch > $20 isn't to tell you the time. A $1,000 watch is jewelry that happens to tell the time. Nothing wrong with any of that, and I do think it's a nice item that can be passed on to future generations (although it might just go the way of the pocket watch: something you keep in a safety deposit box because it has sentimental value, but wouldn't actually use day to day). It's just a completely different domain from a smartwatch.