SPAC & IPO Ideas

  • Guest, it's time once again for the massively important and exciting FoH Asshat Tournament!



    Go here and give us your nominations!
    Who's been the biggest Asshat in the last year? Give us your worst ones!

Sanrith Descartes

You have insufficient privileges to reply here.
<Gold Donor>
45,099
122,699
CCIV sub-$20 today. I have sworn off zero-revenue EV manufacturers for now as I see the big players in the IC engine space making their inroads.
 

Jysin

Ahn'Qiraj Raider
6,491
4,505
Started a position in GSAH at $10.25
Somma bitch. Got me beat by 2c.

gsah.JPG
 
  • 2Worf
Reactions: 1 users

Jysin

Ahn'Qiraj Raider
6,491
4,505
Interesting to note, PSTH didn't even flinch in price with all of the market selling. It is still trading >20% over nav.

(nav is slightly higher than $20 with the 2/9 warrant structure through merge considered)
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user

Jysin

Ahn'Qiraj Raider
6,491
4,505
Chamath fanboys shitting their pants with IPOF rumored talks with Equinox (some shitty gym company). Shares are nearly at nav this morning dumping post / pre markets.

 
  • 1Worf
Reactions: 1 user

Sanrith Descartes

You have insufficient privileges to reply here.
<Gold Donor>
45,099
122,699
Chamath has always been a shyster pump and dump clown who spit out SPACs to collect founder's profits. Fuck him.
 
  • 1Solidarity
Reactions: 1 user

Khane

Got something right about marriage
20,518
14,243
They "died" overnight because there are far too many now. When there are 50 its reasonable to assume some, or even most can find decent companies to bring public. When there are 700 that confidence dwindles rather quickly.
 

Sanrith Descartes

You have insufficient privileges to reply here.
<Gold Donor>
45,099
122,699
It’s rather spectacular how they died out overnight. Didn’t expect that. I reckon it’s a matter of time before they become popular again, barring new regulation that just permanently kills them.

They "died" overnight because there are far too many now. When there are 50 its reasonable to assume some, or even most can find decent companies to bring public. When there are 700 that confidence dwindles rather quickly.

SPAC fever was driven by volume and speculation. That all got out of the door and is chasing the new shiny... doggiecoin and its ilk. We are back to where it was last spring/early summer last year. SPACs sitting around NAV waiting for a DA.
 

Sanrith Descartes

You have insufficient privileges to reply here.
<Gold Donor>
45,099
122,699
Maxed out my position in BTNB at $10.05 and got my cost basis down to $11.
edit: Ditto with BTWN, got my cost basis down to around $11.25
 
Last edited:
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user

Rajaah

Honorable Member
<Gold Donor>
12,664
16,766
I have to say my confidence in SPACs is a bit wobbly given the general lack of activity from buyers and the SPACs themselves. If I were to only keep two of the three I have (BTNB, XPOA, PSTH) which should I drop?

Obvious answer is "whichever I'd lose the least by dropping" which would be XPOA. Or maybe that's the opposite of the obvious answer, because losing the least means you got in at the best point. The highest-average above NAV of the three is BTNB which I'm at 11.30 on, averaged-out, so I'd lose a couple hundo. XPOA I got at 9.90 so I'd lose nothing and may even profit, but it's giving up a nice position. PSTH is actually well above NAV too with 24.50 as the average.

The answer I'd like to hear is "none of them, buy into them more while the price is so good". Unfortunately that same sentiment applies to crypto, and I've got zero Ethereum and only so much to go around.
 

Sanrith Descartes

You have insufficient privileges to reply here.
<Gold Donor>
45,099
122,699
I have to say my confidence in SPACs is a bit wobbly given the general lack of activity from buyers and the SPACs themselves. If I were to only keep two of the three I have (BTNB, XPOA, PSTH) which should I drop?

Obvious answer is "whichever I'd lose the least by dropping" which would be XPOA. Or maybe that's the opposite of the obvious answer, because losing the least means you got in at the best point. The highest-average above NAV of the three is BTNB which I'm at 11.30 on, averaged-out, so I'd lose a couple hundo. XPOA I got at 9.90 so I'd lose nothing and may even profit, but it's giving up a nice position. PSTH is actually well above NAV too with 24.50 as the average.

The answer I'd like to hear is "none of them, buy into them more while the price is so good". Unfortunately that same sentiment applies to crypto, and I've got zero Ethereum and only so much to go around.
I own all three. One is Bill Ackman, one is Peter Thiel/Richard Li and the other is Google Founders. I think they are all three poised to do something decent. IF I truly had to choose I would dump XPOA only because that founder team lacks a more financial based Founder team. But I honestly would keep all three.

What is happening in SPACs is how they worked before they become a flavor of the month. You bought at/near NAV and waited for a DA. The SPAC craze kind of fucked up expectations for newer SPAC investors.
 
  • 2Like
Reactions: 1 users

Sanrith Descartes

You have insufficient privileges to reply here.
<Gold Donor>
45,099
122,699
I think there are only a few of us left in the SPAC world as the rest have left for the FOMO pastures of doggiecoin, but I am dropping this anyway.

Once you SPACs hit NAV/sub-NAV there really isnt a reason to dump them except for the opportunity cost element. If you bought above NAV, this is already a sunk cost. The next part, however, is really important. This ALL changes after a merge. Keep an eye on the vote dates. If you are underwater and the vote is soon you need to make a call to cut bait and eat the loss or not. After the merge the NAV floor goes away. That SPAC trading at $9.90 can quickly become that public company trading at $6.50.

If there is no DA or LOI, then once its NAV/sub-NAV your added risk profile is basically close to zero. You have a paper loss but the threat of additional "major" bleeding is minimal. From an opportunity loss perspective, remember you need to calculate in the realized loss into any new use of that capital if you eat the loss to reallocate and weigh it versus a possible spike up that might occur for a DA announcement. Do the math before you trade.
 
  • 4Like
  • 1Diamond Hands
Reactions: 4 users