- 10,170
- 1,439
Never mind "owing something to society". He was 60, he paid his dues. Death is terrifying, messy, ugly, and causes pain and suffering for all involved regardless of how it occurs. Why the fuck not choose to take control over when and how it takes place? Why look at it as an act of cowardice or selfishness when it is more an act of personal responsibility? What's "selfish" about it anyway? What did he gain or, to be more specific, deprive anyone else of? The wealth he left will help others more than it would have helped him. His organs may help save lives instead of slowly rotting away in his body.
Were some friends and family hurt by his passing? Probably, but they would have been hurt by his passing anyway when it happened 10, 20, 30 years in the future (if they hadn't died by that time, allowing him to feel the hurt instead). The only reason suicide seems "worse" is because it is so often the result of despair, hopelessness and incredible pain. In this guy's case, it wasn't. His life wasn't terrible, he wasn't in pain and his friends and family need not feel a single pang of guilt for anything they could have done to "save" him. If they feel in any way hurt or confused, they can read his deeply personal and informative explanation he provided for that purpose. His life wasn't a "waste" in any measurable sense of the word. He lived what he considered to be a full life and, what's more, was able to spend his last couple of years working on what he considered to be his "legacy". How many people get to do that before they die instead of waiting as their bodily functions start failing one by one?
He hurt no one. He took control of his own death, the act of which had exclusively positive ramifications on society as a whole. Suicide has a stigma, that's the only reason a lot of you are on your high horse about this. I wonder how many of those criticizing actually read his site.
Were some friends and family hurt by his passing? Probably, but they would have been hurt by his passing anyway when it happened 10, 20, 30 years in the future (if they hadn't died by that time, allowing him to feel the hurt instead). The only reason suicide seems "worse" is because it is so often the result of despair, hopelessness and incredible pain. In this guy's case, it wasn't. His life wasn't terrible, he wasn't in pain and his friends and family need not feel a single pang of guilt for anything they could have done to "save" him. If they feel in any way hurt or confused, they can read his deeply personal and informative explanation he provided for that purpose. His life wasn't a "waste" in any measurable sense of the word. He lived what he considered to be a full life and, what's more, was able to spend his last couple of years working on what he considered to be his "legacy". How many people get to do that before they die instead of waiting as their bodily functions start failing one by one?
He hurt no one. He took control of his own death, the act of which had exclusively positive ramifications on society as a whole. Suicide has a stigma, that's the only reason a lot of you are on your high horse about this. I wonder how many of those criticizing actually read his site.