I noticed that too. I think it was J.J fucking trolling or something.The lense flare didn't kick in until the very end, as they go on their 5 year voyage.
Yeah. I wish in the 1980s The Rolling Stones called GnR, Metallica, and all the rest Nu Metal. Fucking generations.This argument reminds me of people who call any metal band they don't like "nu metal"
I've been trying to get into DS9 for a while, since everyone says it gets really good, but it took me about a year to get through the first two seasons. I felt a turn with about 5 episodes remaining in Season 2 and I breezed through those episodes and just finished S3E2. Definitely worth it if the rest of the series stays like this, but it was like pulling teeth to get here.Yeah, they really start hinting at stuff almost right out of the gate in season 2. Season one like Mist said can be rough but there is some good character development.
One thing I liked about DS9 is how important even minor characters turned out to be. The writting in that show was just a step above all other trek imo.
I think the problem with the quoteIt was an attempt to classify a genre that's way too generic. Lithose made a better post about it pages back.
http://www.rerolled.org/showthread.p...l=1#post208958
nah. its a good distinction.I think the problem with the quote
"Rod Serling claimed that the former was "the improbable made possible" (Sci-Fiction) while the latter was "the impossible made probable" (Fantasy)"
Is that it excludes too much of what we call scifi. Plus it's hard for me to separate one section of a universe from another section. Ex as soon as Q comes on the scene in star trek it lessens the science-feel of the entire thing.
For me it's easier to refer to scifi as any fiction focused on science and especially in the future and just ignore the designation of science fantasy.
if it wasn't for such generic script for him to read....it would've been very good.benedict cumberbatch's depiction of khan was much better than the original. he's one of the better villains i've seen in the last decade.
yeah....I thought that was going to happen...and it didn't....made no sense....Why not just crack open another person in the cryo caskets and take some of their blood to heal him?
Correct.This argument reminds me of people who call any metal band they don't like "nu metal"
Well they knew Khans blood will most liekely work, they werent that sure with the still frozen crewmembers, although it would quite possible work as well, but why take the risk when you still need to catch a potential terrorist roaming SF anyway? Plus we dont know what time/tricks/specialists it takes to unfreeze one of the others.This may have been covered in the last 29 pages but I just saw this and why did they need Khan's blood to revive Kirk? Why not just crack open another person in the cryo caskets and take some of their blood to heal him?