Well, whataboutism is a subset of the fallacy Red Herring. You’re drawing attention to <a lot of shitty TV out there> which <Picard wasn’t as shitty as a lot it it>. That’s a false analogy and irrelevant to best Trek (TNG?) or even Trek. Trek ought to be compared to Trek, here on a nerd board. Or if need be Trek’esque shows like the orville or some other relevant space soap opera. At the very least something other than <a lot of shitty TV>. Comon, dirk, apply one or more of your degrees.Sorry everyone. I didn't hate Picard. There's a lot of shitty TV out there, Picard wasn't as shitty as a lot of it. Was it best Trek? No. But I'd watch it again before a lot of shit that's on tv.
I not only didn't just not hate it, there was quite a lot of it I enjoyed.
Come at me.
I don't think you necessarily have to compare them, except in cases where the same character is used etc. Each can stand on its own and be judged. And, apparently, found wanting. The problem with Picard isn't that it suffers compared to TNG in quality, it's just not even the same thing.Well, whataboutism is a subset of the fallacy Red Herring. You’re drawing attention to <a lot of shitty TV out there> which <Picard wasn’t as shitty as a lot it it>. That’s a false analogy and irrelevant to best Trek (TNG?) or even Trek. Trek ought to be compared to Trek, here on a nerd board. Or if need be Trek’esque shows like the orville or some other relevant space soap opera. At the very least something other than <a lot of shitty TV>. Comon, dirk, apply one or more of your degrees.
Well, whataboutism is a subset of the fallacy Red Herring. You’re drawing attention to <a lot of shitty TV out there> which <Picard wasn’t as shitty as a lot it it>. That’s a false analogy and irrelevant to best Trek (TNG?) or even Trek. Trek ought to be compared to Trek, here on a nerd board. Or if need be Trek’esque shows like the orville or some other relevant space soap opera. At the very least something other than <a lot of shitty TV>. Comon, dirk, apply one or more of your degrees.
Well, whataboutism is a subset of the fallacy Red Herring. You’re drawing attention to <a lot of shitty TV out there> which <Picard wasn’t as shitty as a lot it it>. That’s a false analogy and irrelevant to best Trek (TNG?) or even Trek. Trek ought to be compared to Trek, here on a nerd board. Or if need be Trek’esque shows like the orville or some other relevant space soap opera. At the very least something other than <a lot of shitty TV>. Comon, dirk, apply one or more of your degrees.
I like my wife's lasagna more than a literal turd sandwich.
My wife's lasagna is good but she puts a large amount of spinach in it. Cooked spinach has a gross texture and it really hampers the overall dish.
See the difference? You said the first one.
Also, thanks for responding You're still not substantiating your opinion, btw.
Honestly that's the only part of Picard that was good tbh. Her story made me sad for her character. She went through a lot with the rescued borg children.
Does this top IOOTI?All shows are subjective. There are people who love CBS sitcoms and to them, that is quality and they'd watch my weirdo shit and be appalled that someone even made this. There is no objective measure of quality, by definition.
You're missing the point. A turd sandwich was chosen to accentuate the example. Perhaps that was a bad choice. A garbage plate instead then?
You're making a subjective comparison. Whether the objects being compared are in the same "category" or not is irrelevant. Saying you liked something doesn't make it good. Saying something is better than other things doesn't make it good.
That's why I said "whataboutism". Substantiate your claim. What was objectively done well in this show?
You tell me, what objective standards should we use to judge art?Does this top IOOTI?
You tell me, what objective standards should we use to judge art?
There are people who love CBS sitcoms