I don't think anyone is arguing that new villains are impossible or that they are bad ideas. It's just hard to imagine that they are creating an all powerful force user that is very old and has watched the rise and fall of the empire that never showed up at all during the last century of the Republic/Empire cycle. That's why a lot of nerds are searching for ways to tie him into the current lore.Disney will want to continue SW forever, so at some point they're going to have to introduce new, never before seen villains. Will that be stupid then?
It wouldn't be terrible for him to be Plagueis. We're just sick of woolygimp's unstoppable retardation about it being 100% confirmed that Snoke is Plagueis.Haven't read the whole argument and really don't care that much, but as a casual-ish fan of the franchise I gotta agree that having Snoke just be some random dude who comes out of nowhere because reasons would be stupid. Despite the awful name, having him be Plagueis would be cooler than any of the alternatives I've seen.
It's early yet to know Snoke's backstory and how extensive it will end up being. It don't have a problem with the notion of him watching things unfold from some remote area of the galaxy and letting his rivals take each other down before moving to fill the void that is left in the wake. If he ends up being Plagueis that's fine but I would prefer to see them start expanding the lore out from what has already been established. At some point they have to start laying the groundwork for that on the movie side of things.I don't think anyone is arguing that new villains are impossible or that they are bad ideas. It's just hard to imagine that they are creating an all powerful force user that is very old and has watched the rise and fall of the empire that never showed up at all during the last century of the Republic/Empire cycle. That's why a lot of nerds are searching for ways to tie him into the current lore.
It's easy enough to create a new general or some other villain with a back story. Just look at Thrawn. Context matters.
No, what's obvious is that the temperature required to melt his helmet would well exceed the temperature that would only result in superficial scars on his flesh.Besides if you're wearing a helmet, and areas of it start to melt it's very likely that those places are the the ones that will be the most scarred/burnt as that's where the heat was the most intense, as well as having the plastic/metal burn through your skin as well. I thought that was obvious?
Your whole argument here is that you aren't creative or imaginative enough to come up with an interesting story as to how Snoke seemingly came out of nowhere, so that story must be impossibleMy issue with Snoke being a new character is that he's very old and very powerful. What the fuck has this guy been doing for the last hundred years, since he's said to have been alive before Anakin's birth. Who trained him?
How did he become so powerful? How did he become leader of the remnants of the Empire?
Like what the fuck? Super powerful badass comes out of NOWHERE to rule the Galaxy? What kind of bullshit is that. That's like Rey's parents turning out to be Michael Jackson and Lisa Marie Presley's daughter.
lolJust did a little reading. Apparently Vader's armour was empty when Luke burned the funeral pyre on Endor.
Yeah, isn't the assumption that Anakin's body disappeared like Yoda's and Obi Wan's? Since he shows up as a force ghost he must have known how to become one with the force upon death like those two, so he would have faded out the same way. It just would have been offscreen in this instance.Just did a little reading. Apparently Vader's armour was empty when Luke burned the funeral pyre on Endor.
Qui-Gonn did not disappear and was cremated. Anakin's body was in the armor.Yeah, isn't the assumption that Anakin's body disappeared like Yoda's and Obi Wan's? Since he shows up as a force ghost he must have known how to become one with the force upon death like those two, so he would have faded out the same way. It just would have been offscreen in this instance.
For god's sake. It was directly stated in Champions of the Force that Luke saw Anakin's body fade away. Similarly, Mara Jade's body didn't fade away until several hours after her death. Even if those books aren't canon anymore, there's no reason to assume differently unless they explicitly come out and say his body was on the pyre in a new source. Qui-Gon had not mastered the power of turning into a force ghost, which is why he can't physically manifest, only speak.Qui-Gonn did not disappear and was cremated. Anakin's body was in the armor.
I'm not 100%, I guess that was a bit of hyperbole. The similarity of themes, all of the "Wise" references, his appearance, the level of assumed power, his age, and the fact that there really isn't any logical reason for them not to use Plagueis makes it very unlikely he's a new character. I mean Khan wasn't in Star Trek: Into Darkness, right?
Vader was 2.03m tall. Basically just shy of seven foot tall. Plagueis was also very tall.
Man, I just don't know. See what some of you are forgetting is that for there to be a very powerful villain, he had to have a very powerful master. So the Jedi didn't have ANY inclination as to another set of powerful Dark Side users (other than the Sith) for the thousand years under Yoda's stewardship? When Maul died, it wasn't like, "oh well he's a Dark Side user.", they were absolutely convinced that he was a Sith, period.