Found it, the long version!"I can't find it, and you've never seen it, and I'm not gonna post it, but I swear it exists."
- 1
Found it, the long version!"I can't find it, and you've never seen it, and I'm not gonna post it, but I swear it exists."
Found it, the long version!
Found it, the long version!
It unfurls when you click it. Each reply in the thread is a year with a snippet from an article for a given year. For over a hundred years.That's just a picture of a thread icon.
I think you need to have an account to get that feature.It unfurls when you click it. Each reply in the thread is a year with a snippet from an article for a given year. For over a hundred years.
Here is the unrolled version, but it loses the alt text, which contains the reference for each quote.
Thread by @paulisci on Thread Reader App
@paulisci: The Long History of Nobody Wants to Work Anymore 🧵 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993threadreaderapp.com
The point is "nobody wants to work anymore" has been a cultural meme for a very long time. Every generation says it, every year, under good economic conditions and bad.What's interesting is that a lot of those quotes provide context. For example, in 2009 a couple bemoans not being able to find a contractor to work on their lakehouse. Well, guess what, the housing market just shit the bed, so it makes sense that you can't find a contractor.
In 2005 "an intense and demanding boss" has high turnover. He blames people not being willing to work anymore.
In 1999 Cecil gives some context and says "they all want to work in front of a computer", bc the dot come boom was in full swing.
In 2020 the person says, "They're making more money not working", which was during COVID and the government was pissing money from the sky, so people had a lot less incentive to work.
So, I mean, on one hand you're right that people historically blame an unwilingness to work. On the other hand this doesn't paint a clear picture bc the AMOUNT of people who don't want to work and the reasons WHY they don't want to work change. And while your list does a good job of providing evidence as to the why, it doesn't give a clear picture as to the amount.
Looks like I missed the gibbmees?
View attachment 507136
Mist is too stupid for context. He takes newspaper snippets that don't show anything like labor participation rate, or the fact that 7 million working age males have opted not to work at all....these people aren't counted in anything.What's interesting is that a lot of those quotes provide context. For example, in 2009 a couple bemoans not being able to find a contractor to work on their lakehouse. Well, guess what, the housing market just shit the bed, so it makes sense that you can't find a contractor.
In 2005 "an intense and demanding boss" has high turnover. He blames people not being willing to work anymore.
In 1999 Cecil gives some context and says "they all want to work in front of a computer", bc the dot come boom was in full swing.
In 2020 the person says, "They're making more money not working", which was during COVID and the government was pissing money from the sky, so people had a lot less incentive to work.
So, I mean, on one hand you're right that people historically blame an unwilingness to work. On the other hand this doesn't paint a clear picture bc the AMOUNT of people who don't want to work and the reasons WHY they don't want to work change. And while your list does a good job of providing evidence as to the why, it doesn't give a clear picture as to the amount.
Ban bet?Since Mist doesn't have a real job and never has, he doesn't know any business owners
How are you that poor or is it the 19 kids?So I am deferred until February while they finish my SAVE plan. So no payment this month and next month starts my first payment of $0.
Ban bet?
Some secrets man was not meant to know.How are you that poor or is it the 19 kids?
Its hilarious watching them correctly state the cause of the problem, then conclude that the solution is to just dumb everything down.Meta-analysis: On average, undergraduate students' intelligence is merely average
Background. According to a widespread belief, the average IQ of university students is 115 to 130 IQ points, that is, substantially higher than the average IQ of the general population (M = 100, SD =15). We traced the origin of this belief to obsolete intelligence data collected in 1940s and...www.frontiersin.org
Big Ooof
Background. According to a widespread belief, the average IQ of university students is 115 to 130 IQ points, that is, substantially higher than the average IQ of the general population (M = 100, SD =15). We traced the origin of this belief to obsolete intelligence data collected in 1940s and 1950s when university education was the privilege of a few. Examination of more recent IQ data indicate that IQ of university students and university graduates dropped to the average of the general population. The decline in students' IQ is a necessary consequence of increasing educational attainment over the last 80 years. Today, graduating from university is more common than completing high school in the 1940s. Method. We conducted a meta-analysis of the mean IQ scores of college and university students samples tested with Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale between 1939 and 2022. Results. The results show that the average IQ of undergraduate students today is a mere 102 IQ points and declined by approximately 0.2 IQ points per year. The students' IQ also varies substantially across universities and is correlated with the selectivity of universities (measured by average SAT scores of admitted students). Discussion. These findings have wide-ranging implications. First, universities and professors need to realize that students are no longer extraordinary but merely average, and have to adjust curricula and academic standards. Second, employers can no longer rely on applicants with university degrees to be more capable or smarter than those without degrees. Third, students need to realize that acceptance into university is no longer an invitation to join an elite group. Fourth, the myth of brilliant undergraduate students in scientific and popular literature needs to be dispelled. Fifth, estimating premorbid IQ based on educational attainment is vastly inaccurate, obsolete, not evidence based, and mere speculations. Sixth, obsolete IQ data or tests ought not to be used to make high-stakes decisions about individuals, for example, by clinical psychologists to opine about intelligence and cognitive abilities of their clients.
Can we get the average IQ of undergrads separated out by major/race/parents income level? That should be amusing.Meta-analysis: On average, undergraduate students' intelligence is merely average
Background. According to a widespread belief, the average IQ of university students is 115 to 130 IQ points, that is, substantially higher than the average IQ of the general population (M = 100, SD =15). We traced the origin of this belief to obsolete intelligence data collected in 1940s and...www.frontiersin.org
Big Ooof
Background. According to a widespread belief, the average IQ of university students is 115 to 130 IQ points, that is, substantially higher than the average IQ of the general population (M = 100, SD =15). We traced the origin of this belief to obsolete intelligence data collected in 1940s and 1950s when university education was the privilege of a few. Examination of more recent IQ data indicate that IQ of university students and university graduates dropped to the average of the general population. The decline in students' IQ is a necessary consequence of increasing educational attainment over the last 80 years. Today, graduating from university is more common than completing high school in the 1940s. Method. We conducted a meta-analysis of the mean IQ scores of college and university students samples tested with Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale between 1939 and 2022. Results. The results show that the average IQ of undergraduate students today is a mere 102 IQ points and declined by approximately 0.2 IQ points per year. The students' IQ also varies substantially across universities and is correlated with the selectivity of universities (measured by average SAT scores of admitted students). Discussion. These findings have wide-ranging implications. First, universities and professors need to realize that students are no longer extraordinary but merely average, and have to adjust curricula and academic standards. Second, employers can no longer rely on applicants with university degrees to be more capable or smarter than those without degrees. Third, students need to realize that acceptance into university is no longer an invitation to join an elite group. Fourth, the myth of brilliant undergraduate students in scientific and popular literature needs to be dispelled. Fifth, estimating premorbid IQ based on educational attainment is vastly inaccurate, obsolete, not evidence based, and mere speculations. Sixth, obsolete IQ data or tests ought not to be used to make high-stakes decisions about individuals, for example, by clinical psychologists to opine about intelligence and cognitive abilities of their clients.
Can we get the average IQ of undergrads separated out by major/race/parents income level? That should be amusing.
Not quite that, but I've seen this chart linked a lot. Haven't tried to check into the source, but while some of the numbers feel pretty optimistic, it seems directionally reasonable.Can we get the average IQ of undergrads separated out by major/race/parents income level? That should be amusing.